Twitter has re-suspended ElonJet account

Post by strken » Thu, Dec 15, 2022, 2:04 PM UTC

oblio wrote: post #814

twawaaay wrote: post #777

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't care about costly trips. I mean, he has billions and works a lot. Spending a million here and million there is pretty frugal compared to some other people who need to prove their worth by upping each other on who has the largest yacht in the world. What I do care about, though, is hypocrisy.

> I don't care about costly trips. I mean, he has billions and works a lot. Spending a million here and million there is pretty frugal compared to some other people who need to prove their worth by upping each other on who has the largest yacht in the world. > What I do care about, though, is hypocrisy. Turns out, you should care about both. First of all, his private jet costs as much as a yacht, plus he doesn't own…

Post by wendyshu » Thu, Dec 15, 2022, 2:08 PM UTC

kccoder wrote: post #561

boomboomsubban wrote: post #411

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Musk has now included a tweet seemingly trying to dox the stalker, including their license plate. How can he immediately turn from "people shouldn't post publicly available information that can be abusable" to posting someone's abusable public information?

Because he's a terrible person who doesn't really care for anyone or anything other than himself and his giant pile of gold.

Post by ss2003 » Thu, Dec 15, 2022, 2:10 PM UTC

ergocoder wrote: post #602

WatchDog wrote: post #247

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, the hypocrisy is what annoys me the most. Not only does it contradict his direct statement about not banning @elonjet, it contradicts his statements about twitter policy being decided by a committee, as well as his numerous other statements about allowing free speech in general. The policy itself I think makes some sense, although it's interpretation is ripe for abuse, just posting any random picture of someone…

Why does it annoy you? If something might be harmful to my kids, I would ignore what I said earlier and protect my kids first. I don't give a shit if I will be labeled as a hypocrite. My family and kids come first no matter what. Wouldn't you do the same? Would you be like oh damn my kid has to die because I can't be a hypocrite?

Post by [deleted] » Thu, Dec 15, 2022, 2:16 PM UTC

jerojero wrote: post #553

osigurdson wrote: post #469

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is there a distinction between speech and posting other's PII (Personally Identifiable Information)?

Well there was an issue with other account posting information about school teachers being groomers and pointing people to their names, pictures, etc. That account is still online, well and doing it. As others have pointed out, as long as the people that are affected are not Elon Musk, then it seems like for Elon Musk it is mostly fine.

Post by nonethewiser » Thu, Dec 15, 2022, 2:18 PM UTC

__void wrote: post #728

imgabe wrote: post #719

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you own a home, your address may also be publicly available via county records. Does that make it ok to post someone’s home address?

...is perhaps the hundred and fiftieth time I have read this (or a similar variant) nonsense of false analogy, already debunked explained and reexplained in hundreds of variants I am beginning to think that the people who parrot it are not even interested in its response (already said and reiterated hundreds of times in the last 12 hours)