Earlier quoted context omitted.
> No, this is an extraordinary claim without evidence that you are asserting. There are libraries worth of literature on the subject. I encourage you to spend some time seeking it out and understanding it better. > isn't carefully worded, and it's designed to effectively squash any sort of disagreement with the assertion in the first place. It was carefully worded, but you don't seem to be interested in coming to the…
Have you considered that you are making assumptions (e.g. that I have not done reading on this subject) or that you are making personal accusations (e.g. that I may not recognize advantages) based also on assumptions? That perhaps my interest isn’t in fighting but merely challenging your assertion and assumptions? It appears to me you take the position that you are correct, and that any challenge is necessarily one c…
Always, and always open to reconsidering my position or approach.
> (e.g. that I have not done reading on this subject)
You're not demonstrating familiarity with the subject. Your questions have come from a perspective that is addressed in the subject matter.
> or that you are making personal accusations (e.g. that I may not recognize advantages)
That wasn't an accusation. It was a fig leaf. Your positions have rejected your advantages as a white person. "You're off the mark. Way off."
> That perhaps my interest isn’t in fighting but merely challenging your assertion and assumptions?
Your interest increasingly seems to be defensive.
Edit:
> I invite you to re-think your approach to this sort of conversation.
Thank you, but no thank you. You don't seem to be interested in actually discussing the topic, or reconsidering your own positions. I'm 99% certain that I won't make any headway with you regardless of my approach.