Live data from Hacker News

Job-seekers are dodging AI interviewers

fortune.com

801–810 of 918 posts

Re: Job-seekers are dodging AI interviewers

#801

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wild take lol, I was recently unemployed and once I started facing the very real possibility that I'd have to go work at the local sawmill (or UPS) for $20/hr I was willing to do almost any humiliation ritual these companies wanted... and be happy I at least had a shot instead of being ghosted again. I support the fight against this kind of thing, but I also think it's entirely hopeless: They have all the power in th…

> Wild take lol, I was recently unemployed and once I started facing the very real possibility that I'd have to go work at the local sawmill (or UPS) for $20/hr I was My hot take is that if you're an unemployed software dev now, it could last over a year easily, and it's way better to spend that time actually working at the sawmill or UPS if you're lucky enough to get those jobs. Work on your skills and selectively a…

Independent contract work. Form your own LLC and smooth over the employment gap on your CV.

Re: Job-seekers are dodging AI interviewers

#802
post #89

I did one of these once. Once . I felt so bad afterwards that I swore them off forever. It's not like the 'interview' was terrible or anything. I knew it was AI from the start. It was just that when I got done with it, I realized that I had talked at a computer for ~45 minutes. And, yet again, I was going to be ghosted by the company (I was), and that I was never going to get those 45 minutes back. That was time I co…

This sounds so exploitable I almost want to enter the job market again.

Re: Job-seekers are dodging AI interviewers

#803

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It surprises me that the monied elite seem to have so little awareness of what happens when they keep winning.

I’m not that surprised. To reach the level of billionaire, it’s pretty much a requirement that you abandon all empathy and ethics. What’s surprising is that nobody in their circle has educated them on the concept of a win-win. These people could be folk heros, universally loved and respected in ways buying a social media platform and banning all the haters will never accomplish.

Unless you are a founder of a unicorn startup. I used to hang out with one of the GitHub founders before it was a thing - he was engineering director when MSFT bought them out and now is a billionaire (single digit billions but still):

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/P._J._Hyett

Probably more the exception than the rule.

Re: Job-seekers are dodging AI interviewers

#804
post #58

I don't know how to solve this in the current environment. A hiring manager friend said he's getting unprecedented number of application for a software engineering role. Ultimately applicants will endure whatever companies put in front of them with a job market that is this bad. If the government made this illegal companies would come out with ever increasingly silly filters, such as demanding specific college degree…

This 100%, and most of the other replies to the story are bullshit. This works because we currently have an oversupply of candidates for roles. When (if) that flips back, this will likely go away.

Re: Job-seekers are dodging AI interviewers

#805
post #89

I did one of these once. Once . I felt so bad afterwards that I swore them off forever. It's not like the 'interview' was terrible or anything. I knew it was AI from the start. It was just that when I got done with it, I realized that I had talked at a computer for ~45 minutes. And, yet again, I was going to be ghosted by the company (I was), and that I was never going to get those 45 minutes back. That was time I co…

The key is skin in the game. If a human interviews me, if they're wasting my time, they're also wasting their own. So they have some incentive not to do that. But if an AI interviews me, the humans have no incentive not to waste my time. You want to have an AI interview me? No. It can interview my AI agent if you want, but not me . You want to interview me? Put a human on the line.

Shouldn’t you charge a licensing fee if they want to use your agent? You don’t want them to train their own model off of your model.

Re: Job-seekers are dodging AI interviewers

#806

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Most of us on HN are definitely much better off than the average person, so we have the freedom to not desperately pursue any possible chance that comes our way. A lot of people here also have very in demand skills and have companies begging them to work for them, not the other way around. For the people just starting out with no experience, and those wondering whether they should get their car fixed, buy new shoes t…

And that logic would hold up if AI interviewing was being deployed equally across all jobs. But it is not. Go ahead and take the example from the original quote - Braintrust - their web site explicitly caters to technical talent. Entry-level jobs have already been converted to automated Q&A sessions that take place right alongside your application on the jobs site. They have been that way for years. These new AI inte…

I know people applying to entry level jobs even outside of tech who are being given AI interviews. Why do you think this is the only company doing AI interviews and other companies aren't bandwagoning? Kind of silly.

Re: Job-seekers are dodging AI interviewers

#807
post #782

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think “what is an interface” would trip me up actually, haha. My thought process was: Well, most of the code I use uses a Reverse Communication Interface. But, I think these are pretty old-school projects, maybe I should start by talking about the Object Oriented interface to the library that we recently did. Or maybe I can talk about the file IO based interface that I did, it was extremely cursed but kind of funny…

An interface is a layer of translation between two things. In Object oriented programming, it's a contract between two encapsulated modules: you define how one should be used, without exposing internals, and the other will have only this contract to manipulate the module. Otherwise, for a graphical interface, it's a translation between what the machine can do and what the human can see.

But in Object Oriented Programming an interface is also a class with only pure virtual methods, which is the interpretation that came most naturally to my detail-oriented mind. In this case it’s not a translation boundary, but rather a way to abstract away the details of which thing you’re actually talking to.

Maybe the interviewer is okay with either answer, but I could easily see this question resulting in bzzt, you’re wrong if you happen to be thinking the way the interviewer isn’t.

Re: Job-seekers are dodging AI interviewers

#808
post #698

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You are giving advice to some of the dumbest people in the country. I'm not saying its bad advice, but these people are universally stupid. I don't know exactly why things ended up this way, but I'd love to hear where this isn't a truth.

Debris tends to collect in spots that never get cleaned. For some reason, HR never seems to lay off HR.

Wasn’t HR a large part of the tech layoffs a couple years ago?

Re: Job-seekers are dodging AI interviewers

#810

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think “what is an interface” would trip me up actually, haha. My thought process was: Well, most of the code I use uses a Reverse Communication Interface. But, I think these are pretty old-school projects, maybe I should start by talking about the Object Oriented interface to the library that we recently did. Or maybe I can talk about the file IO based interface that I did, it was extremely cursed but kind of funny…

"Can you clarify what you mean by interface?" is the right answer

I might go with "can you clarify what context?", if you can't infer it from the job description. Your wording could be interpreted as fishing for reminders.
Post reply on HN