Wayland is missing one thing still for me. Perhaps someone can tell me there is a way to do this: 1. ssh into a machine with a running session 2. start (something) that lets me remotely connect to it Right now I have two working solutions for X11 (x11vnc, freerdp-shadow) but zero for Wayland. I think this is intentional because the venn diagram of remote-access-tools and malware has a large intersection, but it's ver…
Isn't that wayvnc?
KDE Plasma 6.8 Will Go Wayland-Exclusive in Dropping X11 Session Support
81–90 of 248 posts
Re: KDE Plasma 6.8 Will Go Wayland-Exclusive in Dropping X11 Session Support
#82Wayland is missing one thing still for me. Perhaps someone can tell me there is a way to do this: 1. ssh into a machine with a running session 2. start (something) that lets me remotely connect to it Right now I have two working solutions for X11 (x11vnc, freerdp-shadow) but zero for Wayland. I think this is intentional because the venn diagram of remote-access-tools and malware has a large intersection, but it's ver…
Isn't that wayvnc?
Re: KDE Plasma 6.8 Will Go Wayland-Exclusive in Dropping X11 Session Support
#83Wayland is missing one thing still for me. Perhaps someone can tell me there is a way to do this: 1. ssh into a machine with a running session 2. start (something) that lets me remotely connect to it Right now I have two working solutions for X11 (x11vnc, freerdp-shadow) but zero for Wayland. I think this is intentional because the venn diagram of remote-access-tools and malware has a large intersection, but it's ver…
That "with a running session" bit greatly helps here. While GDM allows you to have remote login and headless sessions [1], with SDDM you're locked out for the moment. There's plans to turn SDDM into a KDE-powered, more featured plasma-login-manager with KRDP integration, but no concrete development yet [2].
Re: KDE Plasma 6.8 Will Go Wayland-Exclusive in Dropping X11 Session Support
#84Earlier quoted context omitted.
The formula is DPI ÷ 96. 100% is 96 dpi, 125% is 120 dpi.
My monitor DPI is 70. 70/96 is 0.73, but there doesn't seem to be a way to set 73%?
Re: KDE Plasma 6.8 Will Go Wayland-Exclusive in Dropping X11 Session Support
#85As an X11 holdout, my time seems nigh.
Re: KDE Plasma 6.8 Will Go Wayland-Exclusive in Dropping X11 Session Support
#86Earlier quoted context omitted.
I find your comment a bit funny on multiple levels. "Linux" does not force anything on you right? It's the community that has by and large decided to move to maintaining other solutions. If you still want to use fvwm you can still run it on arch with x11 until x11 is not maintained and the kernel breaks it somehow
>"Linux" does not force anything on you right? >It's the community that has by and large decided to move to maintaining other solutions. If you still want to use fvwm you can still run it on arch with x11 until x11 is not maintained and the kernel breaks it somehow well you just framed it perfectly; it's still forced on the end-user regardless of whether or not you want to call it 'linux' or 'the community that contr…
Re: KDE Plasma 6.8 Will Go Wayland-Exclusive in Dropping X11 Session Support
#87Earlier quoted context omitted.
Isn't that wayvnc?
If that really meets my needs, that will pull me away from KDE to a wlroots based compositor. I'll try it later, thanks.
But it needs a logged-in session, you can't get access to the login manager.
Re: KDE Plasma 6.8 Will Go Wayland-Exclusive in Dropping X11 Session Support
#88I live in a cave and am not a system programmer -- what's so wrong with X11 so people need to replace it with something else instead of improving it? Or, what's so wrong with anything so people need to replace it with something else instead of improving it? Let's say I'm an old man favoring improving existing stuffs instead of starting from scratch. I like debugging and wish to work as a sys programmer specialized in…
X11 is not really fixable, architecturally. This wasn't some authority saying "X11 is over, stop working on it." It was the X11 developers and DE and WM developers who work directly with the protocol deciding that it's untenable to fix, and something new is actually the right call. That's the important thing that many people are missing: the X11 developers ARE the Wayland developers, and they actually have good reaso…
Re: KDE Plasma 6.8 Will Go Wayland-Exclusive in Dropping X11 Session Support
#89Wayland is missing one thing still for me. Perhaps someone can tell me there is a way to do this: 1. ssh into a machine with a running session 2. start (something) that lets me remotely connect to it Right now I have two working solutions for X11 (x11vnc, freerdp-shadow) but zero for Wayland. I think this is intentional because the venn diagram of remote-access-tools and malware has a large intersection, but it's ver…
I've had good luck with Ubuntu 25.10's builtin remote desktop RDP server. I think it's gnome remote desktop, but I'm not certain. https://github.com/GNOME/gnome-remote-desktop
I used GNOME for many years, but nearly every UX decision they have made in the past 20 years has been the polar opposite of my desires. I have come to the conclusion that the developers in the GNOME project don't want me using their software and I'm happy to oblige them.
Re: KDE Plasma 6.8 Will Go Wayland-Exclusive in Dropping X11 Session Support
#90But if KDE is no longer willing to provide the single most important feature of all - actually working in the first place, rather than just denying that bugs exist - I guess I'll have to hunt for a new DE.
It looks like the only serious possibilities are:
Cinnamon - my gut says this might have the most users? Often cited as the reason to use Linux Mint by people who don't know the difference between a distro and a desktop environment.
LXQt - apparently has stabilized enough to obsolete LXDE (hopefully it isn't being developed by headless chickens like GNOME and now KDE)
MATE - why must there be so many GNOME forks? (I know why) ... does this one even have anything to distinguish it?
Xfce - the longest stable history as its own thing
(all other DEs are known to lack some combination of widespread support and essential features; there are a handful for which it is possible that support will arrive but it is not the case yet, and they will still lose on the "weight of history" stability criterion)