No the op, but as I've mentioned before:
1. I 100% support unions in general and in principle; and 100% support their causes
2. All (every.single.one) unions I've actually personally seen or experienced, in North America, in real life, absolutely were about lowest common denominator.
All unions I've witnessed were solely about seniority. Merit, hard work, initiative, skills, etc were simply not in the contract / not relevant / not a consideration in any sense. Best performing / hardest working, and worst performing person are paid exactly the same, if they are at the same seniority level. So in the most obvious sense you tie yourself to the lowest performing worker. I have literally, literally seen a person competent to operate a machine, replaced by union with a person not trained to operate machine, because of seniority. It was something out of Kafkian Monty Python but it happens frequently.
All unions I've witnessed spent majority of their time, energy and credit fighting for the lowest performing worker. And not in the emotional movie starring Will Smith poor downtrodden worker. No, I mean poop on the factory floor, come to work drunk, then not come to work, then lather rinse repeat, for months. And I mean every one of those words literally, and no it was not a "friend of a cousin of a brother of a guy". It is extremely damaging for the morale of any good worker, and for the relationship with management/business, when union behaves like that. You don't feel like they're a partner, you don't feel they have your best interests in mind.
The slightly more office oriented unions I've witnessed were still suicidal, in the sense that they never ever ever looked at business and the market; they'll strike for a month to get them something that'll close the business in a year.
So, I fully understand that I am lucky, privileged, and have the absolute luxury to not need a union right now. I fully understand that may change and I may be having short sighted perspectives. I firmly believe unions can be a necessary force for good. I fully agree that if you're in a Amazon warehouse today, you probably darn tootin' well want to be unionized.
But I also fully understand how somebody might not be 100% ready to sign "Yes" even without fear mongering and propaganda and bullying, i.e. for legitimate personal and general reasons. In my mind it's still a different kind of propaganda / blindness to believe that every vote for No is because of intimidation (and let's not forget unions can and do intimidate in their own way. Try to cross a striking line or fight for meritocracy or against seniority or not toe the union line and see how long the smiles last. It's ultimately just another kind of bureaucracy / social institution with its own life and rules). Not everybody who wants to have a meaningful discussion and present/is aware of multiple sides to an issue, is "classic anti-union scaremongering".