Earlier quoted context omitted.
> run your own. Is there a good name for this theory that self-hosting something is more reliable? I mean yeah, if you have an outage it only affects you and your customers so I guess it's an improvement in that regard, but thinking you're better at running software than a SaaS is hubris.
> but thinking you're better at running software than a SaaS is hubris. Disagreed on several points. First off, if you're using something like Sentry, chances are that building and running software is your job so it should not be a problem. If self-hosting Sentry is a problem I would start doubting the skills of your tech team. Second, running a service for your own use is very different to running a service that has…
> If self-hosting Sentry is a problem I would start doubting the skills of your
> tech team.
I can't think of any team I've worked at in the past year for whom reading the self-hosted Sentry docs and standing up an instance would be impossible.However, my experience is by and large at early-stage startups, and so I also can't think of any instance where I'd want to have my team working on that when they could be working on adding value to our product. If I can pay Sentry to handle setup, scaling, maintenance, etc (and I do!), then that's worth it when weighed against the dollar and opportunity cost of having my team handle it.
That's not to mention maintenance or other issues.