Smalltalk
Poll: Which programming language do you plan on learning next?
81–90 of 114 posts
Re: Poll: Which programming language do you plan on learning next?
#82Re: Poll: Which programming language do you plan on learning next?
#83Earlier quoted context omitted.
We're doing real time control for vehicles, which has to handle, among other things, valve timing, fuel flow, the transmission, suspension adjustments, braking. We can't afford to have the system break, and Erlang is built for mission critical systems, giving us quality primitives for handling concurrency and software breakage. But in Erlang records and math are kinda broken, and we needed both. Hence, LFE.
Thanks! Is there a link to the project?
Regardless, the answer (I believe) is, not at this time. But soon enough...
Re: Poll: Which programming language do you plan on learning next?
#84php
Re: Poll: Which programming language do you plan on learning next?
#85Objective C
Re: Poll: Which programming language do you plan on learning next?
#86Earlier quoted context omitted.
No it does not... but this is my choice.
I'd say yes, because Scheme is a Lisp and I don't know any specific language that's called just Lisp except perhaps the original one by McCarthy. As far as I know Common Lisp and Scheme are the two Lisp languages in usage today.
Re: Poll: Which programming language do you plan on learning next?
#87Re: Poll: Which programming language do you plan on learning next?
#88Re: Poll: Which programming language do you plan on learning next?
#89Earlier quoted context omitted.
WOW!
We're doing real time control for vehicles, which has to handle, among other things, valve timing, fuel flow, the transmission, suspension adjustments, braking. We can't afford to have the system break, and Erlang is built for mission critical systems, giving us quality primitives for handling concurrency and software breakage. But in Erlang records and math are kinda broken, and we needed both. Hence, LFE.