Live data from Hacker News

Poll: Which programming language do you plan on learning next?

news.ycombinator.com

81–90 of 114 posts

Re: Poll: Which programming language do you plan on learning next?

#83
post #72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We're doing real time control for vehicles, which has to handle, among other things, valve timing, fuel flow, the transmission, suspension adjustments, braking. We can't afford to have the system break, and Erlang is built for mission critical systems, giving us quality primitives for handling concurrency and software breakage. But in Erlang records and math are kinda broken, and we needed both. Hence, LFE.

Thanks! Is there a link to the project?

My project, or Lisp Flavored Erlang?

Regardless, the answer (I believe) is, not at this time. But soon enough...

Re: Poll: Which programming language do you plan on learning next?

#86
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No it does not... but this is my choice.

I'd say yes, because Scheme is a Lisp and I don't know any specific language that's called just Lisp except perhaps the original one by McCarthy. As far as I know Common Lisp and Scheme are the two Lisp languages in usage today.

along with emacs lisp.

Re: Poll: Which programming language do you plan on learning next?

#89
post #67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

WOW!

We're doing real time control for vehicles, which has to handle, among other things, valve timing, fuel flow, the transmission, suspension adjustments, braking. We can't afford to have the system break, and Erlang is built for mission critical systems, giving us quality primitives for handling concurrency and software breakage. But in Erlang records and math are kinda broken, and we needed both. Hence, LFE.

Could you describe how records are broken in Erlang?
Post reply on HN