Live data from Hacker News

The Web’s Missing Interoperability

stratechery.com

81–90 of 97 posts

Re: The Web’s Missing Interoperability

#81

Heh, I published a post in a similar vein just today[1]. Lately I've been thinking the way to do it is have everyone publish a (paginated) Atom feed with all their public content interactions. So each item in the feed would be something like "published this blog post", "liked this tweet", "thinks this comment was written in bad faith", etc. And "follows this person" with a link to that person's atom feed. Then if you…

I’ve been noodling this idea for a few years. I think it’s a great idea and it being based on Atom/RSS is a great move. The problem, I have found, is no one wants to pay for hosting. No one wants to self host. And by no one I mean no one that is using Facebook /Twitter / Insta / etc. and for this to really work, I think you need everyone hosting their own “log”. Interested in seeing more work done in this space and a…

Just of out curiosity, would you consider hosting your friends and families logs if there were a low friction way to do it?

Re: The Web’s Missing Interoperability

#82

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>> The problem, I have found, is no one wants to pay for hosting. No one wants to self host. Self hosting needs to be as easy as plugging a box into your router. This means some type of DNS or other way to find your node given all the ISPs failure to provide fixed IPs. Also a super easy management method and access controls (public, private, friends). I have a lot more thoughts on that.

Do you think there needs to be the infra to support the self hosting or the “killer app” first to drive the early adopters? I think an internet that is mostly self-hosted is a healthy one and unlocks a lot of things I’ve been noodling with over the years. I’m hopeful someone smarter than me is close to getting us there.

A few gaps in infrastructure need to be plugged first. We have most of the constituent parts, it's just that they lack administration layers suitable for modern internet users needs. It's work that requires overcoming inertia and tedium more than any particular smarts. (It'll likely go financially unrewarded too.)

Re: The Web’s Missing Interoperability

#83
post #39
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The solution, as it often is, is to create reasonable exemptions for small businesses. How do people expect a single person to start a business among all of these rules? Obviously there shouldn't be no rules, but they need to be easier to comply with. Right now it all kind of works, because there's a lack of enforcement. But we don't know how many people have given up, because they were uncertain of the regulations.

For new businesses, most support tickets will probably be handled manually. This could even include such mundane things as "could you reset my password" (if you haven't bothered to implement a "forgot my password" mechanism yet, which is perfectly reasonable). Another request could be, "could you delete my account and data". Normally, if a user asks you that, you should probably already do so anyway, GDPR just says t…

Meanwhile people literally google around for small businesses and sue them for operating in historic buildings without ADA access. Congrats, bobs coffee shop is now starbucks!

Re: The Web’s Missing Interoperability

#84

The HN community will agree that there is a deep issue with interoperability and platform risk in Web 2.0, but will again have a knee-jerk response that the rapidly growing Web 3.0 community is awful, there's no point, etc. — because it's crypto. How do you create a software application that exists and runs independently of the platform (and even hardware) on which it exists? How do you create a robust, unified, ince…

Who decided that web 3.0 is built on crypto? I know some in the crypto community like to call it web 3.0, but I am still thinking web 3.0 is something different and built more on web 2.0

It's all nebulous. No one even agreed on what Web 2.0 meant, it's only in retrospect that we think we know.

If we were really sticking to versions being meaningful we probably should have bumped a version when frontend UI frameworks and javascript began dominating web application development, since best I could tell at the time Web 2.0 was just the addition of flat design and ajax calls.

Re: The Web’s Missing Interoperability

#85
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Previously, cookies could be used to track users across websites (e.g. multiple websites using the Shopify platform, by making a request to shopify.com), but also to provide useful functionality (e.g. remembering their contact details). Now, this is not possible anymore, due to first-party isolation being implemented in Safari and now Firefox. Personally, I think this is not such a big deal, as the browser can rememb…

The author explains one of their main concerns: > its attack on “tracking” — which goes far beyond the IDFA — makes it increasingly impossible to acquire users in one place and convert them in another Somehow I can't bring myself to feel sympathy for business models affected by this.

Yeah, me neither. Privacy protections are being implemented by browsers because companies have a history of abuse. Access to this information is not a right, it's a privilege and it's being systematically revoked. They are not entitled to any user information at all and if they can't survive as a business without it then they need to find new ways to make money or go bankrupt.

Re: The Web’s Missing Interoperability

#86

Heh, I published a post in a similar vein just today[1]. Lately I've been thinking the way to do it is have everyone publish a (paginated) Atom feed with all their public content interactions. So each item in the feed would be something like "published this blog post", "liked this tweet", "thinks this comment was written in bad faith", etc. And "follows this person" with a link to that person's atom feed. Then if you…

Interesting concept for sure. Is there a revenue model to attract top influencers? Maybe just links to a collection of Patreon-likes?

Web Monetization standard. Yes. https://webmonetization.org

Re: The Web’s Missing Interoperability

#87

An unlikely outcome that I'd like to see is the following: 1. Legislation makes current models impossible - I'm imagining something like Section 230 being repealed, Twitter and Facebook being on the hook for anything anyone posts, which means they can't moderate and are forced to change their business model/effectively close shop. 2. People still want to blog/share/like. 3. Federated networks become a thing again bec…

The repeal of Section 230 would mean more aggressive and large scale moderation, not less. Remember that the copyright liability incurred by DMCA and other copyright laws didn't kill YouTube, instead it directly led to the creation of ContentID.

I know, my assumption was it would be so much more moderation that they couldn't handle it without completely ruining the user experience.

Re: The Web’s Missing Interoperability

#88

Heh, I published a post in a similar vein just today[1]. Lately I've been thinking the way to do it is have everyone publish a (paginated) Atom feed with all their public content interactions. So each item in the feed would be something like "published this blog post", "liked this tweet", "thinks this comment was written in bad faith", etc. And "follows this person" with a link to that person's atom feed. Then if you…

I'm doing paginated atom feeds as microblog targeting laypeople: https://demo.mro.name/shaarligo - still quite rough.

Re: The Web’s Missing Interoperability

#89

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’ve been noodling this idea for a few years. I think it’s a great idea and it being based on Atom/RSS is a great move. The problem, I have found, is no one wants to pay for hosting. No one wants to self host. And by no one I mean no one that is using Facebook /Twitter / Insta / etc. and for this to really work, I think you need everyone hosting their own “log”. Interested in seeing more work done in this space and a…

>> The problem, I have found, is no one wants to pay for hosting. No one wants to self host. Self hosting needs to be as easy as plugging a box into your router. This means some type of DNS or other way to find your node given all the ISPs failure to provide fixed IPs. Also a super easy management method and access controls (public, private, friends). I have a lot more thoughts on that.

indeed, what do you think about an onboarding like at https://demo.mro.name/shaarligo/o/p/ac2gthz

Re: The Web’s Missing Interoperability

#90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’ve been noodling this idea for a few years. I think it’s a great idea and it being based on Atom/RSS is a great move. The problem, I have found, is no one wants to pay for hosting. No one wants to self host. And by no one I mean no one that is using Facebook /Twitter / Insta / etc. and for this to really work, I think you need everyone hosting their own “log”. Interested in seeing more work done in this space and a…

That's a big reason why I'm excited about repl.it. You can self-host a github repo in about 2 clicks (not including account setup). I could see it increasing the reach of self-hosted apps a lot. Actually I made a little proof of concept for this a week ago: https://github.com/jacobobryant/Feedstuff

my mother won't sign up at github.
Post reply on HN