Live data from Hacker News

Huawei CEO: After September 15 No More Kirin Chips

sparrowsnews.com

81–90 of 170 posts

Re: Huawei CEO: After September 15 No More Kirin Chips

#81
post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Huawei can still buy SoC with US technology in it if it's designed and manufactured by others. US restrictions are all about Huawei’s ability to use U.S. technology and software to design and manufacture semiconductors abroad. BIS made targeted rule "to impose a new control over certain foreign-produced items, when there is knowledge that such items are destined to a designated entity on the Entity List." > (i) Items…

>Huawei can still buy SoC with US technology in it if it's designed and manufactured by others. I don't get it, if the U.S. wants to cripple Huawei why would they let you buy SoC that way? The whole point I thought was that any company dealing with Huawei that used some material proportion of U.S. originated technology to deliver goods to Huawei had to stop. Which means in order for Huawei to build chips it needs a s…

US actions must be proportional and related to the damage that they attribute to Huawei.

Even in close to lawless Trump era there WTO exists and sanctions can be challenged and ignored by other countries if they are excessive.

Re: Huawei CEO: After September 15 No More Kirin Chips

#83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And a clear win for democratic governments who do not send dissenters to re-training camps. From a competitive landscape, yes it sucks. But Huawei / China needs to be punished for its blatant IP theft, I think this is a great place to start.

At the same time the US caused (directly/indirectly) the death of 400-800k people in Iraq. Somehow there is a double standard regarding human rights. China is despicable but I think that the moral ground of the US regarding this kind of issue is quite shaky.

Couldn't agree more.

Re: Huawei CEO: After September 15 No More Kirin Chips

#84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

At the same time the US caused (directly/indirectly) the death of 400-800k people in Iraq. Somehow there is a double standard regarding human rights. China is despicable but I think that the moral ground of the US regarding this kind of issue is quite shaky.

We are a democratic country, don't support a war, vote for someone in office who does not support it. China on the other hand if you don't support putting muslims in concentration camps, you end up there yourself

I don't think there was a vote for invading Iraq, or any of the other countries targeted by the wrecking ball that is US hegemony.

Yes China is quite flawed, but this attempt at maintaining the status quo really only serves to halt progress.

Re: Huawei CEO: After September 15 No More Kirin Chips

#85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I really doubt it. China has its own fabs, they're just a few generations behind (14nm). That "only" means their chips are not competitive in certain contexts (heat, power), not that they can't have chips at all. They're investing heavily in research and development. It's just a matter of time before they catch up. There's no need to do something risky and expensive, like starting a war over Taiwan. And taking over T…

Not to mention that Taiwan will trigger the explosive devices that they have embedded into infrastructure and manufacturing plants. China may coerce Taiwanese scientists, but won’t find a functioning chip fab to use.

That makes blowing up TSMC remotely by hacking a better proposition - leaves all the players at a level playing field while maintaining plausible deniability.

Re: Huawei CEO: After September 15 No More Kirin Chips

#86
post #63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is obviously false on its face. China would have invaded Taiwan from the get for if not for the US. And blaming china’s self defense fears on their building up the military is just communist apologist nonsense

Based on what sources do you make your claims, and what makes you so sure Mahbubani is wrong? Also, regarding "communist"... they're not really communist, haven't been for a long time now. 80% of the businesses in China are privately owned, and people have private property. Though socialist elements still exist; my wife's grandparents recently received new houses from the government, as reimbursement for tearing down…

> Also, regarding "communist"... they're not really communist, haven't been for a long time now.

Right, but communism has never been communism where it has been tried, that's the paradox of communism. trying to continually redefine the term to fit your narrative to that it's still pure is a boring exercise in bike-shedding.

Re: Huawei CEO: After September 15 No More Kirin Chips

#87
post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Huawei can still buy SoC with US technology in it if it's designed and manufactured by others. I don't get it, if the U.S. wants to cripple Huawei why would they let you buy SoC that way? The whole point I thought was that any company dealing with Huawei that used some material proportion of U.S. originated technology to deliver goods to Huawei had to stop. Which means in order for Huawei to build chips it needs a s…

US actions must be proportional and related to the damage that they attribute to Huawei. Even in close to lawless Trump era there WTO exists and sanctions can be challenged and ignored by other countries if they are excessive.

Trump has put the WTO out of action by blocking the appointment of judges.

Re: Huawei CEO: After September 15 No More Kirin Chips

#88
post #80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For very technical things, having the information is not the same as having the ability to manufacture. Some industries don't lend themselves to catching up rapidly, you have to go through all the mistakes yourself. I think semiconductors is one of those industries. An example (unrelated to semiconductors) is China's failure to manufacture a decent jet engine even though they've been trying for 30 years. It turns out…

I'd love to hear more elaboration on that, or a link to an article. As someone way out of my depth it seems almost silly that they wouldn't be able to figure that out through a combination of throwing expertise and money at it and spycraft.

Related: China can finally manufacture ballpoint pens.

https://www.bbc.com/news/business-38566114

Re: Huawei CEO: After September 15 No More Kirin Chips

#89
post #86

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Based on what sources do you make your claims, and what makes you so sure Mahbubani is wrong? Also, regarding "communist"... they're not really communist, haven't been for a long time now. 80% of the businesses in China are privately owned, and people have private property. Though socialist elements still exist; my wife's grandparents recently received new houses from the government, as reimbursement for tearing down…

> Also, regarding "communist"... they're not really communist, haven't been for a long time now. Right, but communism has never been communism where it has been tried, that's the paradox of communism. trying to continually redefine the term to fit your narrative to that it's still pure is a boring exercise in bike-shedding.

I don't know where you got the idea from that I'm 'redefining' communism. Communism refers to an economic system, where one of the properties is that everything is state owned. And that is no longer true. Communism also refers to the Soviet model, and China is no longer using that. If I say that today's China's mostly capitalist system is a new form of communism, then you would be right than I am redefining it. So I am very confused by what you mean when you accuse me of redefining communism.

It seems more like that you are redefining communism to mean whatever system China is using today.

Re: Huawei CEO: After September 15 No More Kirin Chips

#90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We are a democratic country, don't support a war, vote for someone in office who does not support it. China on the other hand if you don't support putting muslims in concentration camps, you end up there yourself

I don't think there was a vote for invading Iraq, or any of the other countries targeted by the wrecking ball that is US hegemony. Yes China is quite flawed, but this attempt at maintaining the status quo really only serves to halt progress.

Please don't be pedantic, We do not have votes on whether the president should sneeze into a tissue or a paper towel, but yes, the president that decided to go to war was voted in by the majority of the population.

Please do not try to push the CCP's propaganda by knocking the United States, it only ends one way, and that is all of us being slaves to winnie the pooh

Post reply on HN