Live data from Hacker News

'We all suffer': why San Francisco techies hate the city they transformed

theguardian.com

81–90 of 131 posts

Re: 'We all suffer': why San Francisco techies hate the city they transformed

#81
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> US public education is ... not exactly what one can expect from a first world country. As a European, I slowly wonder if there's any public service in the US that meets the "first-world country" standard. Not education. Certainly not healthcare. Infrastructure is also crumbling from what I hear.

Military. Fire service. Police (in specific ways). Government research. University education. Parks. Interstate highways.

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/39516346/ns/us_news-life/t/no-pay-...

> The county does not have a county-wide firefighting service (...)

Fire service: Not first world standard.

We can argue that the rest are acceptable examples.

Re: 'We all suffer': why San Francisco techies hate the city they transformed

#82
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because the public system sucks and the more money you have for that the more opportunities they will have.

That the school system sucks is not an unavoidable fact of life, it's a problem that needs to be fixed. I admit, another problem on the big pile of problems that need to be fixed, apparently.

It's a problem that parents can't fix on their own by other means than sending their children to private schools.

Re: 'We all suffer': why San Francisco techies hate the city they transformed

#83

European here. My girlfriend and I are excited to do a tour of the West Coast later this year. As a tech I feel it would be silly to skip San Francisco and Silicon Valley, but I must say the stories I have been hearing have dampened my initial enthusiasm considerably. I now wonder if it is worth our while. If "avocado toast and class warfare" are the main attractions nowadays, we can probably spend our time more wise…

As someone who has been to San Francisco enough to hate it there (which doesn't take that long, really), I still think a couple of things are worth seeing: * Land's End (just outside the city) is beautiful, and worth a visit * The Palace of Fine Arts Theater (not a theater, rather a sort of "monument" made to look like old-world ruins) is very pleasant, and in a pretty area. * I've heard the Presidio in general is re…

I’d probably add Telegraph Hill and Alcatraz. But, yeah, mostly the Northwest of the city. Unless you’re really into architecture I’d avoid downtown and surrounding except for maybe the Ferry Building.

Re: 'We all suffer': why San Francisco techies hate the city they transformed

#84
post #9

>A million-plus for a home with $300,000 down? Then when we have kids, $30,000 a year for private school? This quote totally confounded me. Why is it a given that their kids have to go to private school? If you're optimizing your budget for home-ownership, why not just send your kids to the schools your taxes are paying for?

> why not just send your kids to the schools your taxes are paying for? Because thanks to massive underfunding US public education is ... not exactly what one can expect from a first world country. In some areas children actually only have four days of school because of underfunding ( http://www.ladbible.com/news/news-school-switches-to-four-da... ).

Data on spending per pupil in the US largest school districts [1] reveals that San Francisco spends $13,718 per pupil. San Francisco spends more per pupil than the US average.

OECD Data [2] indicates that overall the US spends on average $13,084 per pupil on secondary education. This is ahead of 31 of the other OECD countries. Only 4 OECD countries spend more than the US per pupil, and only 3 OECD countries (Norway, Austria, and Luxembourg) spend more than San Francisco per pupil.

Several other sources of analysis of per pupil spending are included below.

[1] https://ballotpedia.org/Analysis_of_spending_in_America%27s_...

[2] https://data.oecd.org/eduresource/education-spending.htm

[3] https://www.politifact.com/florida/statements/2015/apr/21/je...

[4] https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/sep/07/us-education...

Re: 'We all suffer': why San Francisco techies hate the city they transformed

#85

European here. My girlfriend and I are excited to do a tour of the West Coast later this year. As a tech I feel it would be silly to skip San Francisco and Silicon Valley, but I must say the stories I have been hearing have dampened my initial enthusiasm considerably. I now wonder if it is worth our while. If "avocado toast and class warfare" are the main attractions nowadays, we can probably spend our time more wise…

There's not much to see in SV apart from the computer history museum, unless you like seeing parking lots and industrial buildings.

On the other hand there are many nice places around the valley. I think that's the only thing I miss from the valley, drive 40 min in any direction and you're either in a forest, a desert, on top of a mountain or at a sea side. I live in berlin now and it's quite the opposite, the city if full of life but the nature sucks for a good 200km radius.

Mountain roads with nice view on top:

https://www.google.com/maps/dir/37.5880399,-121.8692997/37.4...

Nice road in the woods:

https://www.google.com/maps/dir/37.5880399,-121.8692997/37.4...

Small twisty road to santa cruz:

https://www.google.com/maps/dir/37.5880399,-121.8692997/37.4...

I also remember remote hiking trails going up the hills south of mountain view but I can't place them on the map. They were always empty, best place to chill and get out of the stressful environment.

Re: 'We all suffer': why San Francisco techies hate the city they transformed

#86

Why is it that despite high housing prices everywhere in the tech region, homelessness appears acutely concentrated in SF?

Because solutions that work (Free mental health care, free housing, more social workers) are not palatable to the people who live there, despite the city having more than enough money to actually pay for those solutions. So an endless parade of soup kitchens it is.

There are plenty of soup kitchens here in London and reliance on them is rising.

Re: 'We all suffer': why San Francisco techies hate the city they transformed

#87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Plenty of places in the US have excellent public schools. This is unique to SF.

Plenty of places in the U.S. have terrible public schools by developed-country standards. To the point where U.S. tertiary-education institutions are essentially required to compensate for the terribleness with ubiquitous remedial and GED-like courses that are essentially unknown elsewhere, where secondary education does the job properly.

it’s a big country, i don’t know how it compares with all of Europe as far as schools. Schools in Chicago area, for example, are great and there is a big choice of public and private.

Re: 'We all suffer': why San Francisco techies hate the city they transformed

#88

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> US public education is ... not exactly what one can expect from a first world country. As a European, I slowly wonder if there's any public service in the US that meets the "first-world country" standard. Not education. Certainly not healthcare. Infrastructure is also crumbling from what I hear.

Afaik the best health care in the world is only available in the US? Meaning the type of treatments you can get. Whether you can afford them is another question.

Great if you are in the 0.001%.

Re: 'We all suffer': why San Francisco techies hate the city they transformed

#89
post #71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you just read people complaining on HN, then yeah, I’m sure you’d get that impression. The only OECD country to spend more per student than the US is Norway. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cmd.asp San Francisco is not on the high end in the US, but it is suffering largely because of increasing pension and salary requirements. I assume the latter (and likely both) is itself caused by the extreme cost of…

You're somewhat arguing his point for him. We spend significantly more per student than almost anywhere, and our education is comparatively poor. We spend significantly more per patient, and our healthcare is comparatively poor. How much we spend isn't a metric of it being good. It's demonstration of failure.

Yeah, but the parent comment attributes the problem to “massive underfunding,” and that claim was not questioned, but seemed to be accepted.

My point was simply to say that throwing more money at the problem is a poor solution. Pardon the pun.

Re: 'We all suffer': why San Francisco techies hate the city they transformed

#90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> why not just send your kids to the schools your taxes are paying for? Because thanks to massive underfunding US public education is ... not exactly what one can expect from a first world country. In some areas children actually only have four days of school because of underfunding ( http://www.ladbible.com/news/news-school-switches-to-four-da... ).

Is that so bad? Schooling is a waste of time anyway, this way kids have more free time and they can enjoy their childhood and learn some new skills on their own.

I’m sure “kids just learning some new skills on their own” is a perfectly cromulent system.

Universal public education is one of America’s greatest achievements and a tremendous equalizer. At school children learn to socialize, and history, and the arts. They play sports, and get in trouble, put on plays and sign yearbooks.

And it’s a tremendous thing we do that should be encouraged and valued.

Post reply on HN