Live data from Hacker News

Joe Stump: Your city sucks (And so does mine)

stu.mp

81–90 of 154 posts

Re: Joe Stump: Your city sucks (And so does mine)

#81
post #57

I have a love/hate relationship with SF after living here for many many years since 2000. I'm from NYC originally (and finally back) and here are my thoughts after shuttling back and forth for many years. PROS 1. It's probably the safest, relatively big (~ 1M) city that I've ever been to. And I've traveled a lot throughout US and the world. If something bad happens to you in SF, you've really, really should hone your…

I can't disagree with much you've said. I was born and raised in San Jose. For most of my life, San Francisco was always been the place I thought was fun to visit, but didn't want to live in. I live here now and it's better than I thought, but I still have issues.

Crime -- As far as big cities go, New York & San Francisco are both abnormally safe. They regularly rank as two of the safest large cities in the country.

Food -- They both have a diverse selection of awesome food.

Beauty -- San Francisco is nestled in one of the most beautiful parts of the Bay Area. The scenery is awesome. The city is way too dirty though. I'm very liberal, but San Francisco is too liberal even for me. The city has a problem with litter which it needs to address, but the bigger problem is the homelessness. San Francisco actually has a homeless lobby whose actions ensure that homelessness remains a problem. They believe people have the right to be homeless, live on the street, and panhandle (frequently in ways that strikes fear into the heart of tourists). There are plenty of humane policies that can help reduce this problem, but the city is so liberal that policies like "Care Not Cash" are shouted down as if they were modern day Nuremberg Laws.

Hipsters/Wannabes/Bohemians/etc. -- Definitely can go too far and be annoying at times, but its also part of the culture of San Francisco that I can find charming. Like everything: in moderation. New York has its own version of this though -- the "I'm richer than you" syndrome -- the incessant need to buy ridiculously priced clothes, hand bags, accessories (women AND men), the name dropping, the pretentiousness, etc. Get over yourself.

Too laid back -- Probably. New York can be too high strung. I enjoy both in moderation.

Weather -- Wow. I'd much rather have SF's moderate weather, even if it is a little chilly at times, than NYC's hot, humid summers and cold, icy winters. But if SF gets too chilly for you, you're almost always a short drive away from a micro-climate that's beautiful.

Dating -- Well I can't complain as a gay guy. It doesn't get much better than SF. We have a few great spots in the whole country and I'm fortunate to live in one of them.

Some things I think you left out --

Blunt & Rude Honesty vs. Nice Dishonesty -- As a Bay Area native, one of the things I absolutely love about NYC is people's blunt honesty, even if it is rude at times. At least you know where you stand with people. On the West Coast, people will smile & pretend like they like you or agree with you, even if they don't. And then when you leave, they'll talk about you behind your back. This can be especially painful in the startup world when you're raising money and few will tell you the real reason why they're not convinced by your pitch.

Proximity to Destinations -- San Francisco is anywhere from minutes to just a couple hours away from beaches, beautiful mountains and camping spots, skiing, the best wine country in the U.S., legendary national parks, etc.

Suit vs. Jeans/T-Shirt/Hoodie -- I much prefer SF's dress code to NYC's.

Diversity -- Yes, both cities are very diverse. But I think San Francisco is more of a melting pot. New York seems like it still has neighborhoods that are very stratified racially/ethnically.

---

Anyways, I really love both cities for different reasons and I don't think I have a favorite. I hope someday I'll be able to move to New York and really live in it.

Re: Joe Stump: Your city sucks (And so does mine)

#82

what about vancouver (canada)?

Great place to live; horrible place to start a tech company.

No-one here as any idea what you're talking about if you start talking consumer web startups. That includes the VCs/angels in the city. Forget about finding employees with relevant experience.

There are positively scads of game studios here, though. One of the best places in north america for that. Also: enterprise software.

It is very bike friendly except for the downtown peninsula (which isn't a big negative, actually: most of the action in Vancouver is not downtown). It has the best japanese and indian food in north america (both high- and low-end), and possibly chinese as well (I wouldn't know as I'm not a fan). Foodies praise Vancouver for its snobby restaurants being not quite as good as nyc et al. but significantly cheaper.

Re: Joe Stump: Your city sucks (And so does mine)

#84

I'll throw in my comments about Washington D.C./Northern Virginia. I've lived here about ten years (first five in Northern Virginia, the past five in downtown DC) Pros: 1.) The tech community here is actually quite good. It definitely feels like it's gotten better since I've lived here. There's no shortage of smart folks working on cool things, even if they are a little more spread out geographically. 2.) While I wou…

I used to live in Washington and I thought it was a great place for a semi-foodie like myself. There are certainly some great "uber-expensive" restaurants there, but there are a lot that don't break the bank. Matchbox, Heritage India, Jaleo, Luigi's, Old Glory... I loved the pizza at Armand's (Chicago-style) and 2 Amys (Neapolitan). Northern Virginia dining could be hit-or-miss, but the Great American Restaurants cha…

I disagree on both your pizza choices, but I may just be a pizza snob ;)

Sweetwater is actually my favorite restaurant in the area. Everything there is awesome, and it's priced very reasonably.

There's good eating in Northern Virginia, it's just very spread out. Ironically, I had much better experiences with restaurants when I lived in Northern Virginia than when I moved to DC (I just had to drive more).

Re: Joe Stump: Your city sucks (And so does mine)

#85
Something that hits you as you get older is "how about having kids and a family?", which he doesn't consider at all. Fair enough, but sooner or later it does become important for many people.

I've only lived in SF and Portland, not Seattle or Boulder. I think it'd be fine to have a family in Portland - like he said, the prices aren't so high, and it's got some nice neighborhoods where kids would be ok. My guess is that Boulder is small enough that that holds true as well. SF on the other hand requires some serious cash if you want to have a larger home, and I'm a bit less sure about schools there.

Also, when I was in SF, it seemed very much a place for 20-somethings. "Normal people" who don't pull in major cash tend to drift elsewhere if they want to be able to afford a more or less normal house, which skews the demographics further. In the end, I didn't like that very much... here in Padova, one rubs shoulders with both wealthy, middle class and the less well off, young and old, which feels about right to me. Same in Portland, depending on where you go. SF was very much a bubble in many ways.

Re: Joe Stump: Your city sucks (And so does mine)

#86
It's probably not wise to completely trust a single person's impressions of an entire city, but this really reinvigorated my desire to get out of the rural Midwest and get a job somewhere where things are happening. Also, this article opened my eyes to Portland and Boulder, which the author made sound extremely appealing to me.

Lastly and incidentally, that's my favorite kind of masturbation.

Re: Joe Stump: Your city sucks (And so does mine)

#88
post #40
post #2

Having been to all these towns, I have to agree with him that Seattle has the best beer scene in the US.

I'm not sure he said that. I think if anything, he made the strongest case for Portland. I think he does sell San Francisco a bit short in the beer department. While the city itself isn't known to produce a huge amount of widely known brews, there are a couple good breweries in the city limits. Additionally, some of the best beers in the world are all made within a half-day drive of San Francisco (Russian River, nuff…

If you're going to call Deschutes a Portland beer at 160+ miles away (and at the same time, leave out Rogue? That one confused me.), I think it's fair to call Russian River, North Coast, Lagunitas, Bear Republic, Anchor, and Sierra Nevada all San Francisco area breweries — and it's a little hard to argue with those. (As long as you like hops, at least.)

Re: Joe Stump: Your city sucks (And so does mine)

#89

For another city to compare, I've spent the last two summers in Cambridge/Boston: Pros - Decent public transportation - Huge college talent pool to draw from - Startups in the area tend to come out of area colleges - Recruiting from those colleges is probably the primary draw for the big tech company offices in the area - Slightly cheaper rent than SF, with much cheaper options accessible by public transportation - H…

> There's a 200 year old frigate in the harbor that used to do battle with pirates and there are lots of cool old buildings all around

I didn't realize the music industry was that old.

Re: Joe Stump: Your city sucks (And so does mine)

#90
post #57

I have a love/hate relationship with SF after living here for many many years since 2000. I'm from NYC originally (and finally back) and here are my thoughts after shuttling back and forth for many years. PROS 1. It's probably the safest, relatively big (~ 1M) city that I've ever been to. And I've traveled a lot throughout US and the world. If something bad happens to you in SF, you've really, really should hone your…

Interesting did you move there for a startup? Or just for the city?

Moved for the startup, stayed for the city.
Post reply on HN