Live data from Hacker News

Joe Stump: Your city sucks (And so does mine)

stu.mp

51–60 of 154 posts

Re: Joe Stump: Your city sucks (And so does mine)

#51
post #2

Having been to all these towns, I have to agree with him that Seattle has the best beer scene in the US.

THIS is where I draw the line.

Best beer scene? Really?

That's insane. If Boulder does anything right, it's the fact that it's in the center of the beer capital of North America. Avery, Great Divide, New Belgium, O'Dell, Left Hand, and a ton of smaller breweries are within 30 minutes of Boulder.

They hold the Great American Beer Festival (see #1 http://allaboutbeer.com/live-beer/culture/2008/05/the-growle...) in Denver for a reason.

It's bizarre that Joe didn't mention it. Colorado absolutely kicks ass at beer:)

*EDIT: I should also mention that we just elected a fricking brewer as as our new governor. :)

Re: Joe Stump: Your city sucks (And so does mine)

#52

Pittsburgh is beautiful. It has a decent startup scene and lots of tech talent (pitt, cmu). Rent is extremely cheap here, so you can't get more ramen profetable than here. We also have our own startup incubator, alphalab. Seriously. Pgh has all the qualities needed to become the next major startup community.

My friends that have gone to CMU all say the same. What are the ideal neighborhoods for someone coming from SF or NYC? I'm thinking with bars and restaurants and a general nightlife-ish, walkable vibe.

The biggest ones:

* Oakland is where Pitt is at. It's got tons of college kids running around everywhere, with tons of bars and places to eat.

* Shadyside is where all of those kids go after they graduate. It's where I'm sitting right now. More families, but still a bunch of stuff to do. Can be expensive (oh wait, you're coming from NYC/SF, it's dirt cheap, nevermind) if you don't look around.

* CMU is located on the border between Shadyside, Oakland, and Squirrel Hill.

* Squirrel Hill is where most CMU students live. It's a very family oriented neighborhood, lots of quiet streets, but still has a quite bustling 'main street.'

* The South Side is a bit far from those three neighborhoods, but it's got a _crazy_ nightlife. The number of bars would be illegal if they weren't grandfathered in, no joke. This is where AlphaLab is, along with a bunch of other tech companies, and lots of families, punks, etc. Reminds me of the Mission a bit, though I was only there for a day or two, so that could be a slightly poor characterization.

What you have to remember about Pittsburgh is that each neighborhood is a totally viable mini-city. They all have a 'main street' where most of the commerce is, and then housing around it. So there's at least something to do everywhere, though some places are obviously more bustling than others.

I've lived here all my life, so if you have any more specific questions, ask away.

Re: Joe Stump: Your city sucks (And so does mine)

#53

Pittsburgh is beautiful. It has a decent startup scene and lots of tech talent (pitt, cmu). Rent is extremely cheap here, so you can't get more ramen profetable than here. We also have our own startup incubator, alphalab. Seriously. Pgh has all the qualities needed to become the next major startup community.

My friends that have gone to CMU all say the same. What are the ideal neighborhoods for someone coming from SF or NYC? I'm thinking with bars and restaurants and a general nightlife-ish, walkable vibe.

Stick to the South Side, Shadyside, or Squirrel Hill.

I went to Carnegie Mellon for graduate school, and a number of my friends started companies in Pittsburgh afterword. It is definitely a good place to get a venture off the ground.

But... at least two of those (4+ year old) companies have since moved out here to the Bay Area for growth reasons. This is where the money, talent, and clients are based.

Re: Joe Stump: Your city sucks (And so does mine)

#54
post #29

For folks that are outside of SF or didn't vote, we had a measure up for vote to prevent sitting or lying on public sidewalks. This is principally targeting the homeless problem. Luckily, it passed! Go to this link and go all the way to the bottom. Its item L. http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/11/03/... Edit Additionally, it looks like Ron Conway was a big contributor to this. http://ballotpedia.o…

[deleted]

Re: Joe Stump: Your city sucks (And so does mine)

#55
post #29

For folks that are outside of SF or didn't vote, we had a measure up for vote to prevent sitting or lying on public sidewalks. This is principally targeting the homeless problem. Luckily, it passed! Go to this link and go all the way to the bottom. Its item L. http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/11/03/... Edit Additionally, it looks like Ron Conway was a big contributor to this. http://ballotpedia.o…

Was that supposed to be sarcasm? If so, slightly too subtle. If not, wow.

Re: Joe Stump: Your city sucks (And so does mine)

#56
post #23

Whenever someone talks about how dirty SF is, you know they confined themselves to SOMA, TL, the Mission and maybe North Beach. The rest of the city is about as clean as any big city in the US. There's nothing particularly dirty about the Sunset, Richmond, Pac Heights, Cole Valley, Parnassus, Diamond Heights, West Portal, Forrest Hill, Russian Hill, Glen Park, or the other neighborhoods that make up most of San Franc…

People who think that San Francisco weather is terrible are typically from places like Los Angeles (where I'm from) or other places that equate excruciating heat with nice weather. I actually like the cold and rain, and it only lasts for a few months. Put on a dang sweater and man up. It's worth noting here that it was 80 degrees in San Francisco today. In November.

Reminds me of:

"The coldest winter I ever spent was a summer in San Francisco."

(While usually attributed to Mark Twain, the actual source of these words of wisdom is unknown - there is no evidence that Mark Twain ever said this.) from: http://www.nps.gov/alcatraz/

Re: Joe Stump: Your city sucks (And so does mine)

#57
I have a love/hate relationship with SF after living here for many many years since 2000.

I'm from NYC originally (and finally back) and here are my thoughts after shuttling back and forth for many years.

PROS

1. It's probably the safest, relatively big (~ 1M) city that I've ever been to. And I've traveled a lot throughout US and the world. If something bad happens to you in SF, you've really, really should hone your street smarts. And no, Tenderloin is not dangerous at all as I've lived a couple of blocks from there for few years.

2. Probably the only other city (NYC is the other) where you truly have a diverse selection of food. That's pretty impressive for such a small city.

3. It's probably one of the most beautiful cities I've ever been to. I love the rolling hills and some great views especially of GG bridge and Bay Bridge. I wanted to move to SF for a long time, and it took a while for me to sink in that I was actually living in SF.

CONS

1. It's a city of wannabes. Basically everyone lives in the future (they "wanna/hoping to" have a startup, or "do art" etc). Ambitious people are good, but I feel SF definitely goes a bit far in this regard. For startups, it's due to the availability of venture capital in the city, where you don't need to be profitable from day one. In comparison, New York is about hustling and making money FROM DAY 1, not tomorrow, not in few years.

2. The bohemian/alternative/smug feel of the city. South Park had a funny episode about this. For example, people drive Prius in order to "show off" how green and environmentally friendly they are. Some of my good friends (non hipsters or art people, etc) only eat organic and only shop at Trader's Joe or Whole Foods. Apparently Safeway is not good enough. Organic is good, but try going to a restaurant with someone who is stubbornly organic about food content there, and will refuse to go. I mean come on, you're not gonna die if you eat non-organic once in a while!!

3. It's too laid back. If you love New York or East Coast in general, I think you'll find the slowed pace of the city irritating. In some ways this is a consequence of (1).

4. Nobody grows up in the city. This is a big one. I've seen some girls who are 35 and still wear clothing that a early 20s girl would wear. Same for guys. You can be 40+ or 50 and still live with roommates, etc. I've always felt that a cutoff for living with roommates is like 30 or maybe even early 30s, but 40+ is a bit too much.

5. The weather plain sucks. You have windy/sunny-turning-to-foggy weather (65-55F) pretty much all year except about 2-3 times a year when a heatwave (75F+) lasting about 3-4 days comes in and you can finally walk around with a t-shirt at night. There's really two seasons: dry and wet. I respect East Coast's weather much more because I know that in June I will be rocking a t-shirt all day and night and don't need to carry a jacket "just in case". Mark Twain said the coldest winter he'd ever been to was a summer in SF. SF's summer months are typically the coldest in the whole country.

6. Don't get me started on dating. As a guy, I still stick to my theory that it's probably one of the WORST cities to hook up I've ever been to. Most of the places are just full of guys which makes sense since West Coast has statistically more single guys than single girls. East Coast is a bit better in this regard. I always told myself if ever I move back, and that's a big if, I'll have to be married or have a serious girlfriend. And if you're a girl, don't get too excited; I've been told from female friends of mine that the guys are no prize either.

7. Pretentious Hipsters. Need I say more?

Re: Joe Stump: Your city sucks (And so does mine)

#58

No talk of Boston and just a mention of New York? It does not make much sense to compair technology/startup cities and totally leave out the East Coast.

I think that he was just comparing places he's actually lived and worked- which IMO is nice because then I don't feel like he's making stuff up.

Re: Joe Stump: Your city sucks (And so does mine)

#59
For another city to compare, I've spent the last two summers in Cambridge/Boston:

Pros

- Decent public transportation

- Huge college talent pool to draw from

- Startups in the area tend to come out of area colleges

- Recruiting from those colleges is probably the primary draw for the big tech company offices in the area

- Slightly cheaper rent than SF, with much cheaper options accessible by public transportation

- Home prices are way cheaper than the SF Bay Area

- Great nightlife, successful sports teams if you're into that

- There's a 200 year old frigate in the harbor that used to do battle with pirates and there are lots of cool old buildings all around

- The area is becoming more startup friendly. There are resources like TechStars and the Cambridge Innovation Center that weren't around a decade ago.

Cons

- Annoying Puritan laws that aren't enforced evenly

- Cold, long winters

- Hot summers, though this past summer wasn't especially hot

- Not much of a startup culture compared to other cities. Other than the students, people are pretty complacent in general in Boston/New England

- Most people in the area are from there originally or went to school there, more-so than other cities

- Small bubble of startups working on tools for academics

- Parking and driving are kind of a nightmare. Lanes disappear, Massachusetts drivers are super-aggressive, lanes are really skinny, etc..

Neutral

- Not as diverse as other cities, especially outside of the colleges

- Startups in the area are more focused on making money right away

Re: Joe Stump: Your city sucks (And so does mine)

#60

Meanwhile, here in Minneapolis (really could apply to any upper Midwest city like Chicago, Milwaukee, Madison, etc.): Pros: - If you like seasons, you get them. - Excellent beer. Many bars. Great nitelife. - Clean. No poop on the streets, even in the worse parts of the city. - Great public transportation (except Milwaukee). - Cheap rent (2BR for $1500 along the river with a view of the skyline) - Many excellent CS de…

Is the public transit really that great? I was looking at the Wikipedia article and it looks like you guys just have one light rail line and some commuters. Can you actually get to all the places you need without a car?
Post reply on HN