Live data from Hacker News

Ubuntu on Windows

blog.dustinkirkland.com

781–790 of 933 posts

Re: Ubuntu on Windows

#781

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Apple is pretty user-hostile. Moreso than MS in my estimation. Try changing the battery in your iphone, or getting music on it without using itunes.

> Try changing the battery in your iphone Try changing the battery in your Lumia.

My Lumia 640 has replaceable battery. It might be a windows phone though.

Re: Ubuntu on Windows

#782
post #764

It is possible this is the beginning of the end for Window and Linux too. Basically the strategy would be to get all the user to switch to a priority (aka propriety) version of Linux, much like Google has done with Android.

Canonical has been trying that for a long time, what with Ubuntu having a huge semi-proprietary code base not shared with any other distribution (Mir, Unity, own font rendering, Launpad/bzr for development, …).

Obviously, Canonical isn't Microsoft, though who knows, anything is possible; maybe Google will acquire Canonical.

Re: Ubuntu on Windows

#783

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I doubt any game developer decides not to release a Linux version purely because "oh, Wine exists".

Game developers no idea, application developers yes. TeamViewer and Softmaker Office are programs I ditched in frustration because their official Linux "ports" are the Windows versions bundled with a bugged WinE wrapper around them.

I think game developers are a bit of a unique case, because a large chunk of the linux gaming community is pretty hostile towards wine ports. There is no linux proprietary application community

Re: Ubuntu on Windows

#784

Earlier quoted context omitted.

HN had a huge influx of developers who predominately (or only) work on the Microsoft platform, and it has been readily apparent in the stories that rise to the top, and the dominant reactions (e.g. cynical takes are quickly transparent. Exaggerated "this changes everything!" comments rise to the top). This isn't necessarily a bad thing, but it does heavily slant the coverage and slant of the conversation. And as you…

Only that all big Software or hardware companies do this... Apple keeps the doors closed to anything not in their full control, nvidia was pushing for open standards when they were the underdogs and now they have a lot of proprietary stuff, Google with Gtalk/Jabber etc etc. It's pretty ignorant to only paint MS that way imo. I also believe MS is a very different company today with a different strategy because they lo…

Stellar work, missing and proving the parent's point. Simply stellar.

Re: Ubuntu on Windows

#785

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Go to a brick and mortar electronics store, pick out a laptop that meets your desired specs, and do something realistic with it for a while. There are lots of little things I took for granted about Apple MacBooks that no Windows laptops could match. Touch pad, high dpi display, and cooling were never quite done right, but they are crucial for every day operations.

I would suggest not trying to source quality hardware from an electronics store. For software development, Thinkpads more then compete with MacBooks, the keyboard is considerably better too.

I just meant electronics stores have display models you can try before buying. I think my local stores carry Thinkpads, maybe they were IdeaPads.

Re: Ubuntu on Windows

#786
post #233

Surprised I don't see anyone else mentioning this. This looks to me like typical Microsoft strategy that they utilized a lot 25 years ago. 1. when not leader in given market, make your product fully compatible with competitor 2. start gaining momentum (e.g. why should I use Linux, when on Windows I can run both Linux and Windows applications) 3. once becoming leader break up compatibility 4. rinse and repeat Happened…

Microsoft is not the same company it was 25 years ago, much less 3 years ago. Microsoft cares about Azure now, and Azure requires GNU/Linux. It just makes sense for Microsoft to do this, and I for one am pretty excited about it.

I'm pretty sure you have the things on the wrong sides of the "much less" in your first sentence (unless you intend to say that Microsoft is more like the company it was 25 years ago than the one it was 3 years ago.)

Re: Ubuntu on Windows

#787
post #233

Surprised I don't see anyone else mentioning this. This looks to me like typical Microsoft strategy that they utilized a lot 25 years ago. 1. when not leader in given market, make your product fully compatible with competitor 2. start gaining momentum (e.g. why should I use Linux, when on Windows I can run both Linux and Windows applications) 3. once becoming leader break up compatibility 4. rinse and repeat Happened…

Yeah, embrace, extend, extinguish. I don't think it is about that though as they can easily be ignored now. I imagine that they are genuinely losing enterprise traction. If I were on windows I'd run some docker or a VM. I would NEVER compile g++ via openssh from Visual >BARF< Studio. Really in your enterprise you should have a macbook/chromebook on your desk (at home or in the office) and a linux server in the cloud. Unix everywhere now. Bye bye windoze.

Re: Ubuntu on Windows

#789

Earlier quoted context omitted.

One aspect is the technology, another aspect are the values driving that technology, another aspect is the legal aspect. You are mixing them all and that's how the debate gets stuck into some neckbeard-limbo that nobody cares about. Society made a lot of progress when religion and state got decoupled from each other. There are some things that should be handled separately. What I have to say about this is: Technology…

Yes partycoder, it sure would be interesting to hear what "neckbeard" RMS has to say about this move by Microsoft today, would it not?

On calling people 'neckbeards' (and other pejoratives): https://forums.meteor.com/t/why-no-stack-overflow/20158/16

I think he would say what he has always said about secret software. He's fairly consistent in that regard.

Re: Ubuntu on Windows

#790
I have to admit that watching the comments of all the "freedom philosophers" is entertaining. Even when something good happens...people running more free software...it's just not good enough. Never mind the massive amounts of "un-freedom" that are involved in producing computer hardware...or that their profit RMS developed his "freedom philosophy" on computers at MIT that were being used to literally build the most powerful technologically advanced military in history. Seriously, protesting password access to computers paid for by DARPA?

Tool. So are all of you fanboi's.

Post reply on HN