Live data from Hacker News

Apple introduces new AirTag with longer range and improved findability

apple.com

771–778 of 778 posts

Re: Apple introduces new AirTag with longer range and improved findability

#771
post #764

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I do. I don't own an airtag.

So your complaint is, "This product that I don't own, and isn't designed to do what I want, doesn't do the thing it isn't designed to do.". Do you also post complaints that GE Washing machines don't have a built-in method to cook a fucking chicken?

[deleted]

Re: Apple introduces new AirTag with longer range and improved findability

#772

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>I'm sure this is true for the UK No, it isn't. The police in the UK are stretched extremely thin.

Just claim they have been mean on twitter and they will send a squad

Not any more, they have been rowing back from that.

Re: Apple introduces new AirTag with longer range and improved findability

#773

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The point of the comment is that this is not something we should have to tolerate or worry about in a seemingly high-trust society.

I totally get and respect the perspective of the parent poster, I'm just keeping it real that the US is generally not a high-trust society. If it were, we wouldn't have disclosures and disclaimers and limits of liability for everything we do all day long.

>I'm just keeping it real that the US is generally not a high-trust society.

Completely false, you mean Urban areas are not high trust.

I live in a place (In the US) where kids walk to school, don't lock bikes and our downtown has free umbrellas to take and give back whenever there is rain.

Re: Apple introduces new AirTag with longer range and improved findability

#774

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Love to live there but chances they'll let me are roughly 0%. It's convenient (for them) that racial discrimination isn't a crime in Japan.

The way ethnic minorities are getting treated in the US at the moment implies a race to the bottom. How many days is it since the last state sanctioned shooting?

[flagged]

Re: Apple introduces new AirTag with longer range and improved findability

#775
post #764

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I do. I don't own an airtag.

So your complaint is, "This product that I don't own, and isn't designed to do what I want, doesn't do the thing it isn't designed to do.". Do you also post complaints that GE Washing machines don't have a built-in method to cook a fucking chicken?

I didn't make a complaint.

Re: Apple introduces new AirTag with longer range and improved findability

#776
post #633

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why does people leaving guns in cars make the stealing worse?

Because the thief gets a gun.

Sorry, let me rephrase to what I meant: why does it make it a more common problem?

Re: Apple introduces new AirTag with longer range and improved findability

#777
post #650

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, the place she thought needed her prayers. How is that important?

What are your views on abortion? I believe in free access. I also believe those going to get an abortion shouldn’t be impeded by protesters in the immediate vicinity when getting their healthcare.

She was standing alone, across the street, on the curb/grass next to the sidewalk, kind of doing a homer simpson into the bushes.

There were no other people visible, she made no noise.

She didn't impede anyone, and it would have been very difficult to tell she was protesting, if that's in fact what she was doing (I'm not her, so I don't know).

I don't believe in God, so those particulars (or that it was an abortion clinic) aren't important to me. She was arrested for thinking silently to herself.

Re: Apple introduces new AirTag with longer range and improved findability

#778

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You could let the victims decide, or make it (depending on the type of crime) that they first pay off the debt and then go to prison (perhaps with reduced sentence) or the other way around.

I think you're oversimplifying. Those are hard questions to answer and have the impacts extend beyond the victim and perpetrator. There are social costs to each of those decisions. Part of the legal system is to ensure there is that balance. That is the social contract. Determining if this is done effectively (or even at all) is a different question, but one that can only be answered through answering a million small…

Of course it’s difficult. But simply not holding them responsible at all for the costs they incur on society, and not making police and judges at least partially responsible for actually solving cases or ensuring recidivism is reduced is also not an option.
Post reply on HN