Live data from Hacker News

Meta Movie Gen

ai.meta.com

771–780 of 1001 posts

Re: Meta Movie Gen

#771
post #731

It's already bad, but the amount of garbage that is going to flood YouTube now is going to make it unusable.

I’m already sick of all the bullshit thumbnails to be honest. It’s at the point where I feel like giving up my premium subscription.

You would maybe like this YouTube click-bait reducing browser plugin:

https://dearrow.ajay.app/

Re: Meta Movie Gen

#772

I've kinda given up on the internet at this point. It's sad but comforting. My social networks are just my friends and I've started to get back into reading books and long form blogs. Don't want to be exposed to this endless slop. Every day it gets harder to find something that was so easy before. It's all being buried by endless content. I'm hoping some non AI generative content branch of the internet will be create…

Focus on in real life experiences, stop consuming low effort media.

Re: Meta Movie Gen

#773
post #731

It's already bad, but the amount of garbage that is going to flood YouTube now is going to make it unusable.

nobody is forcing you to subscribe to ai video channels. the creators you currently enjoy won't just start making ai videos?

Re: Meta Movie Gen

#774

I've been saying for years that generated content is an impending tsunami that's going to drown out all real human voices online. The internet may become effectively unusable as a result for anything other than entertainment.

This is interesting and i see some of this now. Even here on HN and other forums i thought were mostly "human". Even one of my group chats i can tell one of my friends is using ai responses, but one of the other members cant tell and replies earnestly. I am grossed out by this. my instinct is to avoid ai slop. The interesting part to me is: What next? Where do we go? Will it be that "human" forums are pushed further…

Your droids, they'll have to wait outside

Re: Meta Movie Gen

#775
post #517

A lot of folks in this thread have mentioned that the problem with the current generation of models is that only 1 in (?) prompts returns something useful. Isn't that exactly what a reward model is supposed to help improve? I'm not an ML person by any means so the entire concept of reward models feels like creating something from nothing, so very curious to understand more.

Which AI's allow you to keep training the model? Most are pre-trained without you knowing how. If you use an open source LLM, you could probably do it, but then you already need to have a lot more understanding of it, and be more technical, and have proper hardware. Most AI's I have seen and worked with don't have an option to keep training it. You just use the model as-is, possibly with a initial prompt to tell the AI in what kind of fashion it should respond.

Re: Meta Movie Gen

#776
post #691

I've kinda given up on the internet at this point. It's sad but comforting. My social networks are just my friends and I've started to get back into reading books and long form blogs. Don't want to be exposed to this endless slop. Every day it gets harder to find something that was so easy before. It's all being buried by endless content. I'm hoping some non AI generative content branch of the internet will be create…

It's just a technology. Much like you can still buy "hand made" shoes, there will be people that create curated hand made content. And if they use AI and you can't tell the difference, does it really matter? I really don't understand why there is so much negativity for a new technology. It's never explained, just taken as a fact and people bemoaning the new state of the world.

I'll tell you why. I think it's fair to say that most of the people who visit this site are technologists.

Most of us love technology. So why are people reacting like this?

Because we know how this will be used. We know of grifters and quick-buck schemes. We know that, unfortunately, the web as we know it is rapidly dying. We know of the scammers calling you with your loved ones' cloned voices.

We know how powerful this tech is, how easy it is, and how it will be misused.

Re: Meta Movie Gen

#777
post #154

These are not movies, these are clips. The stock photo/clip industry is surely worried about this, and probably will sue because 100% these models were trained on their work. If this technology ever makes movies, it'll be exactly like all the texts, images and music these models create: an average of everything ever created, so incredibly mediocre.

I imagine a movie maker where you say "use model A and put them in scene 32f, add a crowd and zoom in on A. They should look very worried." Then they can just play with it. Then save a scene, onto the next. Since AI can continue an animation, I don't see why it can't faithfully recreate given models with more development

Re: Meta Movie Gen

#778

I've kinda given up on the internet at this point. It's sad but comforting. My social networks are just my friends and I've started to get back into reading books and long form blogs. Don't want to be exposed to this endless slop. Every day it gets harder to find something that was so easy before. It's all being buried by endless content. I'm hoping some non AI generative content branch of the internet will be create…

That was unavoidable. Your (and mine, btw.) reaction is healthy. I hope more people start to withdraw more from the virtual world. Once they do, many will recognize that it's become an addiction: The good feelings of discovering new things on the internet is gone long ago. What is left is the bad feeling, when we don't distract ourselves with it. A typical sign for addiction.

Back to the topic: I'm still worried by the huge danger of mass delusion. Commercially, but much more politically. How easy will it be to create fake movies of war scenes. There've been fake photos around for a long time. By setting up real scenarios and of course by "photoshopping". Now, there's not much left we can trust.

The good and only way out of this to learn to not trust anything you see on the internet or television. We need new ways of trusted communication.

Re: Meta Movie Gen

#779

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A friend who lives in North Carolina sent me a video of the raging floodwaters in his state- at least that's what the superimposed text claimed it was. When I looked closer, it was clearly an Indian city filled with Indian people and Indian cars. He hadn't noticed anything except the flood water. It reminded me of that famous selective attention test video[1]. I won't ruin it for those who haven't seen it, but it's a…

hmmm... Maybe it's because I knew it was testing me, but I noticed it right away and counted the right count. I could see it being pretty shocking if I hadn't, but I honestly can't imagine how I'd miss that.

Once you see it you can indeed not imagine how you couldn't. Some people see it the first time, but it's a small amount of people. This video just demonstrates how humans can only focus at one thing at a time, and when we're multitasking, we're actually doing little parts of different tasks one at a time but very quickly after each other, kind of like a single CPU core. And if we tightly focus our attention to one point, we are not aware of other things that might be relatively close to that point.

That is also how magicians work, drawing your attention to one particular thing, hiding the secret of the trick from you, sometimes even in plain sight, like in the video.

Or pickpockets, who might bump into you and picking your pocket at the same time, where your attention is focussed on the sudden impact, keeping your attention away from your walled being taken.

Re: Meta Movie Gen

#780
post #612
post #547

Earlier quoted context omitted.

probably people will soon develop a habit of verifying every detail in videos of interest haha

Cause people are well known for verifying every detail in most other forms of media already right?

Verifying what?
Post reply on HN