Earlier quoted context omitted.
In a scenario where you are losing a significant part of the population to war, it's better that it be men.
why?
Because a thousand women don't need a thousand men to make the next generation.
German men 18-45 need military permit for extended stays abroad
741–750 of 799 posts
Re: German men 18-45 need military permit for extended stays abroad
#742Earlier quoted context omitted.
Birth rates among liberal women in almost all developed societies suggest otherwise. Women are doing double duty and doing both badly. Women are relatively and absolutely less happier than they were 50 years ago. So I'm having hard time believing that this new norm is a win for anyone.
The reality is that most women are simply not interested in raising more than two children per person. If this is undesirable from a societal perspective then they either need to be forced (which I hope you're not seriously suggesting) or the incentives to raise more children need to be increased (atm there are none except personal satisfaction) and the downsides need to be mitigated (without a stable career, women a…
Yeah right. Depending on their spouse is not ok but depending on whims of a soulless corporation is ok. Do you hear yourself?
Re: German men 18-45 need military permit for extended stays abroad
#743Re: German men 18-45 need military permit for extended stays abroad
#744Earlier quoted context omitted.
Previously it was conditional, only in effect “in the event of tension or defense” (machine translation), but they are very exceptional circumstances -- AFAIK not ever invoked since unification. The change this year was to make it applicable regardless of those conditions: “Outside the tension or defense case, §§ 3 [...]” shall apply. This is a significant change from the previous Cold War policy. I have talked about…
Idk why you are being downvoted, what you said is factually correct.
I'm always eager to be corrected if wrong. Such replies welcome.
Re: German men 18-45 need military permit for extended stays abroad
#745Earlier quoted context omitted.
I reject your accusation of transphobia. I point out that you seem to be fine with discriminating against some males but not others.
Trans women are not male, including biologically if you assume HRT. This is overcompensating rationality to shit on a group of people that are functionally intersex for "biological" distinction. And we're not even talking about a context where biology matters. You just wanted to vice signal. If you want to make this an SBGG criticism, I'd love to see you even get close to proving abuse beyond singular instances. Even…
[flagged]
Re: German men 18-45 need military permit for extended stays abroad
#746Earlier quoted context omitted.
They don’t get half, the get half of the martial gains at best, if a prenup exists it could be completely different. There is a reason why so many women face poverty when they retire. The system isn’t flawed, it’s skewed on purpose historically.
> The system isn’t flawed, it’s skewed on purpose historically. Ah yes, it's a conspiracy.
»You don’t need a formal conspiracy when interests converge«
There is a reason why Elisabeth Selbert, Helene Weber, Frieda Nadig, and Helene Wessel had to fight in the Parliamentary Council of 1948–49 to add the phrase “Men and women have equal rights” to the constitution despite initial resistance.
It took another decade before women could have bank account or a job with their husbands' permission.
It took until 1997 before martial rape was a officially a crime.
And even now where we have an alleged case of fake porn and identity theft by the husband of famous woman, is the first reaction of the CDU deflection: We can’t discuss violence against women with considering the image of women in Islam.
What a bunch of nonsense. These are distinct problems that can easily handled separately.
But it’s always the same pattern, the scapegoats are either poor, jobless or migrants but don’t ever touch the real problems.
Re: German men 18-45 need military permit for extended stays abroad
#747Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
Well that depends. Are they saying this because they have a problem with me specifically? Or is it because they have a problem with my asshole friend who I for some reason support financially? If it’s the latter (like it is in reality, AFAICT), I would first do some serious reflection about my friend.
They are not saying DEATH TO YOUR FRIEND. They are saying DEATH TO PFANNKUCHEN.
How much more specific do you want them to be?
Again, why would you let them get strong? Just so they kill you and your family? You don’t seem to care about yourself nor about your family enough.
Re: German men 18-45 need military permit for extended stays abroad
#748Re: German men 18-45 need military permit for extended stays abroad
#749Earlier quoted context omitted.
Men are biologically disposable. If a nation lost 90% or better of its adult male population, it could still bounce back within a generation or two. Women have no incentive to change that, and the small fraction of men powerful enough to change it can already exempt themselves from the meat grinder. The remaining men's opinions don't matter.
German women as capable as men, btw. How about to stop this sexist bullshit
Capable at what? In war fighting context is very important. Some combat operations are better left to strong men.
Re: German men 18-45 need military permit for extended stays abroad
#750Earlier quoted context omitted.
They have a job and they are paid for it. They also do have pensions and social security benefits: through their husbands. If the husband remains alive, they continue to be paid as they were before retirement. If he dies, they often inherent his pension and assets. It's a terrible system and we need to modernize it but you're still wrong on all of your points.
No, they are not paid. Their husbands get paid, they have all the pensions and social security benefits, not them. Means total dependence on their husbands. If they get a divorce they have nothing.
Sure, it is well known that in a divorce women just walk away with nothing /s
A quick google search shows you that the average is 50/50 when it comes to the division of the assets.
Why do you feel the need to lie about something so easy to verify?