Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you don't want your payments to be tracked you need to use cash or crypto. Otherwise, just use a credit card. I really don't see how unlocking a phone is easier or more convenient than using a credit card.
The watch is on my wrist, or the phone is already in my hand. The credit card is buried in a wallet that needs to be taken out of and put back into a pocket. Also “unlocking” isn’t an inconvenient step, on iPhone it just happens automatically. As it should on android if the fingerprint sensor is in a convenient location.
Motorola announces a partnership with GrapheneOS
721–730 of 930 posts
Re: Motorola announces a partnership with GrapheneOS
#722Earlier quoted context omitted.
> WSL2 basically works minus some annoying behavior and caveats. It is a lot of annoying things. Everything is just so clunky and I don't think it is surprising given that it is a subsystem. At least in the mac I can still access the computer I'm typing on through the terminal. I mean yeah, I can do that with Winblows but it is non-native and clunky. I mean ever try to open a folder with a few hundred images in it? (…
What setup do you use for seeing image previews (or the images themselves?) on a terminal in Linux?
Re: Motorola announces a partnership with GrapheneOS
#723If anyone from Motorola reads this thread; the market is beyond ripe for a good shake up. Going full open source and pushing updates & openness, user control and freedom, you will gobble up a good chunk of market share. Make MDM easy & first class (no third parties...), and a ton of corp will roll it out too. We need you more than you think.
Re: Motorola announces a partnership with GrapheneOS
#724If anyone from Motorola reads this thread; the market is beyond ripe for a good shake up. Going full open source and pushing updates & openness, user control and freedom, you will gobble up a good chunk of market share. Make MDM easy & first class (no third parties...), and a ton of corp will roll it out too. We need you more than you think.
I don't think open source can get a big market share but it can give you a nice niche market of tech enthusiasts if they play their hand well. For that they need to not let the development of the OS to just the graphene os team, and to have competitive hardware, software and prices.
Re: Motorola announces a partnership with GrapheneOS
#725Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's not what I observe. Many non technical people have ethical concerns. This fantasy among the technical crowd here that the general public only cares about cheap and convenient, which is at best condescending, needs to die. Convincing oneself of this only takes meeting non technical people.
Every non-technical person I’ve talked to doesn’t seem to care. In many cases I think it’s because they don’t really understand or the threat is too abstract. For example, collecting information to display ads and manipulate an algorithm to influence how a person thinks, feels, and consumes, for fun and profit. Since they can’t see it, think they’re above it, and see stuff that makes them laugh, they just keep going.…
Most people I know aren't particularly technical, and many of them are at least concerned or aware of these topics, even if they haven't taken any concrete actions (yet).
Keep trying to gently spread the word then, that's a good thing to do (without being annoying!). It takes time, but it eventually pays.
Re: Motorola announces a partnership with GrapheneOS
#726If anyone from Motorola reads this thread; the market is beyond ripe for a good shake up. Going full open source and pushing updates & openness, user control and freedom, you will gobble up a good chunk of market share. Make MDM easy & first class (no third parties...), and a ton of corp will roll it out too. We need you more than you think.
> Going full open source and pushing updates & openness, user control and freedom, you will gobble up a good chunk of market share. Of the enthusiast market. The absolutely worst customers to be dependent on.
Re: Motorola announces a partnership with GrapheneOS
#727Re: Motorola announces a partnership with GrapheneOS
#728If anyone from Motorola reads this thread; the market is beyond ripe for a good shake up. Going full open source and pushing updates & openness, user control and freedom, you will gobble up a good chunk of market share. Make MDM easy & first class (no third parties...), and a ton of corp will roll it out too. We need you more than you think.
I agree strongly with this. I would ditch my iPhone in a heartbeat for an open source alternative.
Re: Motorola announces a partnership with GrapheneOS
#729[flagged]
Re: Motorola announces a partnership with GrapheneOS
#730Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Motorola makes great hardware too Do they? I genuinely don’t know because I don’t think I have ever seen a Motorola smartphone in the wild and their heavy involvement with the police and surveillance state has my attention piqued a bit. I’m just saying GrapheneOS partnering with possibly the biggest police state surveillance solutions provider? What’s that all about?
Are you confusing Motorola Mobility with Motorola Solutions? The article is about Motorola Mobility, which makes cell phones. Motorola Solutions makes two-way radios and surveillance systems. They split in 2011.