Not great. Any other company would have been put on my greedy-morons list. But i believe JetBrains is special and is allowed more mistakes than others. I also believe they should really stay calm and not get sucked into the AI hype. Worst case they will be the heroes to the people who like to program for the joy of it, in case these AI IDEs should really take over (which i highly doubt).
Their main target market are enterprise Java developers, whose intersection with "people who like to program for the joy of it" is close to zero. Lately they've also been coddling with the VSCode crowd by aggressively pushing the new UI over loud objections of old loyal users. Either one seems like direct opposite of the hacker user you're mentioning.
JetBrains defends removal of negative reviews for unpopular AI Assistant
71–80 of 154 posts
Re: JetBrains defends removal of negative reviews for unpopular AI Assistant
#72Deleted comment cited by the author: “ I previously submitted a review critiquing this plugin, but it was removed by JetBrains moderation — an unfortunate decision that, in my view, undermines trust in open feedback. I have now tested the latest AI plugin (v243.23654.270.16). The plugin does offer limited support for third-party providers like Ollama and LM Studio (the latter being a better fit for most local LLM use…
…why can’t I edit this 9-minute old comment for formatting? @dang
Re: JetBrains defends removal of negative reviews for unpopular AI Assistant
#73Earlier quoted context omitted.
Their main target market are enterprise Java developers, whose intersection with "people who like to program for the joy of it" is close to zero. Lately they've also been coddling with the VSCode crowd by aggressively pushing the new UI over loud objections of old loyal users. Either one seems like direct opposite of the hacker user you're mentioning.
Also people who like good IDEs. But we know that real hackers use emacs.
Re: JetBrains defends removal of negative reviews for unpopular AI Assistant
#74> a JetBrains employee said that reviews were removed because they mentioned issues that had since been solved That shouldn't be considered a valid reason to remove a review. I could maybe understand down-weighting reviews as they age and as issues are resolved, but as a potential buyer of some product/service/whatever, knowing that something was released with a bunch of issues (even if now solved) is a valuable sign…
Re: JetBrains defends removal of negative reviews for unpopular AI Assistant
#75I love JetBrains and hate vscode, but Cursor was such a huge productivity boost that I ended up switching. Unfortunately none of the JetBrains plugins (Junie, the older AI Assistant, Windsurf/codeium, etc) come close yet :(
Re: JetBrains defends removal of negative reviews for unpopular AI Assistant
#76I cancelled my JetBrains license a few days ago after I was required to agree to new terms and conditions, they expended no effort and took zero time to explain the changes, what has changed and why, I was shown a ridiculously long legal document and asked to agree or get fucked. There was no feedback option when cancelling the subscription, they clearly don't care.
Didn’t you read the ridiculously long legal document and agreed to it when you got the license in the beginning as well?
Re: JetBrains defends removal of negative reviews for unpopular AI Assistant
#77> a JetBrains employee said that reviews were removed because they mentioned issues that had since been solved That shouldn't be considered a valid reason to remove a review. I could maybe understand down-weighting reviews as they age and as issues are resolved, but as a potential buyer of some product/service/whatever, knowing that something was released with a bunch of issues (even if now solved) is a valuable sign…
"We fixed yesterday's outage, review removed"
Re: JetBrains defends removal of negative reviews for unpopular AI Assistant
#78Earlier quoted context omitted.
…why can’t I edit this 9-minute old comment for formatting? @dang
Apparently some accounts can have their edit window muzzled if a moderator chooses to. I have a reduced 10 minute edit window that was applied to my account without notice or explanation, it's fully possible that you might have one too.
Re: JetBrains defends removal of negative reviews for unpopular AI Assistant
#79They have much superior product compared to VSCode in terms of pretty much everything, except AI. Not sure why it’s so hard for them to catch up with Cursor. They have everything they need but somehow they focus on just something that they don’t have much expertise, building models instead of better integration. It’s a shame seeing such good product going downhill considering AI is becoming fundamental for dev produc…
> They have much superior product compared to VSCode in terms of pretty much everything, except AI Disagree, I keep trying Jetbrains once in a while and keep walking away disappointed (used to be a hardcore user). I use VS Code bc it is seamlessly polyglot. Jetbrains wants me to launch a whole separate IDE for different use cases, which is just horrible UX for me. Why would I pay hundreds for a worse UX?
Re: JetBrains defends removal of negative reviews for unpopular AI Assistant
#80> a JetBrains employee said that reviews were removed because they mentioned issues that had since been solved That shouldn't be considered a valid reason to remove a review. I could maybe understand down-weighting reviews as they age and as issues are resolved, but as a potential buyer of some product/service/whatever, knowing that something was released with a bunch of issues (even if now solved) is a valuable sign…