Live data from Hacker News

JetBrains defends removal of negative reviews for unpopular AI Assistant

devclass.com

71–80 of 154 posts

Re: JetBrains defends removal of negative reviews for unpopular AI Assistant

#71

Not great. Any other company would have been put on my greedy-morons list. But i believe JetBrains is special and is allowed more mistakes than others. I also believe they should really stay calm and not get sucked into the AI hype. Worst case they will be the heroes to the people who like to program for the joy of it, in case these AI IDEs should really take over (which i highly doubt).

Their main target market are enterprise Java developers, whose intersection with "people who like to program for the joy of it" is close to zero. Lately they've also been coddling with the VSCode crowd by aggressively pushing the new UI over loud objections of old loyal users. Either one seems like direct opposite of the hacker user you're mentioning.

Also people who like good IDEs. But we know that real hackers use emacs.

Re: JetBrains defends removal of negative reviews for unpopular AI Assistant

#72

Deleted comment cited by the author: “ I previously submitted a review critiquing this plugin, but it was removed by JetBrains moderation — an unfortunate decision that, in my view, undermines trust in open feedback. I have now tested the latest AI plugin (v243.23654.270.16). The plugin does offer limited support for third-party providers like Ollama and LM Studio (the latter being a better fit for most local LLM use…

…why can’t I edit this 9-minute old comment for formatting? @dang

Apparently some accounts can have their edit window muzzled if a moderator chooses to. I have a reduced 10 minute edit window that was applied to my account without notice or explanation, it's fully possible that you might have one too.

Re: JetBrains defends removal of negative reviews for unpopular AI Assistant

#73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Their main target market are enterprise Java developers, whose intersection with "people who like to program for the joy of it" is close to zero. Lately they've also been coddling with the VSCode crowd by aggressively pushing the new UI over loud objections of old loyal users. Either one seems like direct opposite of the hacker user you're mentioning.

Also people who like good IDEs. But we know that real hackers use emacs.

Real hackers use butterflies.

Re: JetBrains defends removal of negative reviews for unpopular AI Assistant

#74
post #5

> a JetBrains employee said that reviews were removed because they mentioned issues that had since been solved That shouldn't be considered a valid reason to remove a review. I could maybe understand down-weighting reviews as they age and as issues are resolved, but as a potential buyer of some product/service/whatever, knowing that something was released with a bunch of issues (even if now solved) is a valuable sign…

They should attach a YouTrack issues to reviews, which would automatically show that the issue has been fixed. Their YouTrack integration is pretty deep elsewhere. Still doesn't solve the problem of the average score, though.

Re: JetBrains defends removal of negative reviews for unpopular AI Assistant

#75

I love JetBrains and hate vscode, but Cursor was such a huge productivity boost that I ended up switching. Unfortunately none of the JetBrains plugins (Junie, the older AI Assistant, Windsurf/codeium, etc) come close yet :(

Have you tried Continue?

Re: JetBrains defends removal of negative reviews for unpopular AI Assistant

#76
post #51

I cancelled my JetBrains license a few days ago after I was required to agree to new terms and conditions, they expended no effort and took zero time to explain the changes, what has changed and why, I was shown a ridiculously long legal document and asked to agree or get fucked. There was no feedback option when cancelling the subscription, they clearly don't care.

Didn’t you read the ridiculously long legal document and agreed to it when you got the license in the beginning as well?

I asked ChatGPT to give me the 1 line summary

Re: JetBrains defends removal of negative reviews for unpopular AI Assistant

#77
post #5

> a JetBrains employee said that reviews were removed because they mentioned issues that had since been solved That shouldn't be considered a valid reason to remove a review. I could maybe understand down-weighting reviews as they age and as issues are resolved, but as a potential buyer of some product/service/whatever, knowing that something was released with a bunch of issues (even if now solved) is a valuable sign…

"This thing is expensive and it barely works"

"We fixed yesterday's outage, review removed"

Re: JetBrains defends removal of negative reviews for unpopular AI Assistant

#78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

…why can’t I edit this 9-minute old comment for formatting? @dang

Apparently some accounts can have their edit window muzzled if a moderator chooses to. I have a reduced 10 minute edit window that was applied to my account without notice or explanation, it's fully possible that you might have one too.

[flagged]

Re: JetBrains defends removal of negative reviews for unpopular AI Assistant

#79
post #63
post #35

They have much superior product compared to VSCode in terms of pretty much everything, except AI. Not sure why it’s so hard for them to catch up with Cursor. They have everything they need but somehow they focus on just something that they don’t have much expertise, building models instead of better integration. It’s a shame seeing such good product going downhill considering AI is becoming fundamental for dev produc…

> They have much superior product compared to VSCode in terms of pretty much everything, except AI Disagree, I keep trying Jetbrains once in a while and keep walking away disappointed (used to be a hardcore user). I use VS Code bc it is seamlessly polyglot. Jetbrains wants me to launch a whole separate IDE for different use cases, which is just horrible UX for me. Why would I pay hundreds for a worse UX?

you can install nearly all of their supported language plugins in your editor fyi. you just lose some of the language specific integrations if you use the python plugin via intellij for example.

Re: JetBrains defends removal of negative reviews for unpopular AI Assistant

#80
post #5

> a JetBrains employee said that reviews were removed because they mentioned issues that had since been solved That shouldn't be considered a valid reason to remove a review. I could maybe understand down-weighting reviews as they age and as issues are resolved, but as a potential buyer of some product/service/whatever, knowing that something was released with a bunch of issues (even if now solved) is a valuable sign…

My comment complaining about it being bundled and enabled by default, with no way to uninstall, only disabled. They gave me the same excuse, but those "features" are still exactly the same as they were then.
Post reply on HN