Live data from Hacker News

In the end, you're treated like a spy, says MIT scientist

nytimes.com

71–80 of 484 posts

Re: In the end, you're treated like a spy, says MIT scientist

#71
post #12

I mean what you do in these situations is just have NY times write an article like this on you that you can point to in job applications and any reputational damage is probably nullified.

This option is probably not open to early career scientists.

How many early career university scientists get arrested for not disclosing their ties to China? These are high profile cases with established professors at their core.

Re: In the end, you're treated like a spy, says MIT scientist

#72

Last week, the government dismissed the case against Dr. Chen, which alleged that he had concealed seven Chinese affiliations in applications for $2.7 million in grants from the U.S. Energy Department. Prosecutors announced that they had received new information indicating that Dr. Chen had not been obliged to disclose those affiliations, undercutting the basis of the case. I feel like this part could use more detail…

sounds indeed like mistrial rather that the allegations having no validity at all. The NYT doing quality reporting as usual in a long piece of fluff.

Re: In the end, you're treated like a spy, says MIT scientist

#73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> were the affiliations unremarkable and not reportable but prosecutors screwed up? Yes, the prosecutors royally screwed up. From the article: "Prosecutors had floated the idea of a deferred prosecution agreement, which would have allowed him to return to work and apply for government grants in the future. In return, said his lawyer, Mr. Fisher, he would have to admit to having some ties to China, none of them a viol…

Sounds like a prosecutor was afraid to get sued into oblivion/have his future political ambitions ruined by this affair, and strong-armed the good doctor into signing a document to avoid this going to court, where outcomes are pretty much random.

* tried to strong-arm. He didn't accept the deal.

Re: In the end, you're treated like a spy, says MIT scientist

#74
post #48

"The dismissal is a setback to the China Initiative, an effort started in 2018 to crack down on economic and scientific espionage by China." No, it is not. Why would it be a setback if somebody who is innocent has their case dismissed. I mean who writes such lines? Doesnt this line imply that this dismissal was a bad thing (since nobody endorses espionage).

One assumes that the goal of the China Initiative is to charge people who are actually guilty of espionage. Highly public failings at that goal would seem to be setbacks, right?

Re: In the end, you're treated like a spy, says MIT scientist

#75
post #48

"The dismissal is a setback to the China Initiative, an effort started in 2018 to crack down on economic and scientific espionage by China." No, it is not. Why would it be a setback if somebody who is innocent has their case dismissed. I mean who writes such lines? Doesnt this line imply that this dismissal was a bad thing (since nobody endorses espionage).

[deleted]

Re: In the end, you're treated like a spy, says MIT scientist

#76
post #61

This is a troubling story in so many ways, I don't know what the answer to the problem is but feel something needs to change within the government when people are subjected to what can only be described as a witch trial bordering on McCarthyism. The fact the state and his own lawyer were pressing him to take a deal is also very troubling as it echoes the plight of many impoverished young men who lost their families,…

When both the state and his lawyer were pressing him to take the deal, both the state and his lawyer believed he was guilty. The charges were withdrawn, as I understand it, when the Department of Energy clarified the understanding of the grant application for the US attorney and they came to the conclusion that there was not a duty to disclose the particular affiliation. There’s no doubt that this caused professional…

You seem to imply that he flouted the rules, but we don't know if he has any ties to China beyond the ties that anybody born there would have.

Re: In the end, you're treated like a spy, says MIT scientist

#77
To at least attempt to think about this critically, and to try to ignore the amount of frankly shocking things people are saying here, can I ask, maybe from people in the field, is this level of industrial/scientific espionage even a critical factor in our current world? We live in a global world where scientists in various institutions are constantly trading papers, findings. Why are we so worried that the U.S. might be doing something so different from China, that this level espionage would even be viable? Surely, everyone is working on different things here and there, but this idea that there is such critical intellectual property the US that needs to be guarded so intensely in this like James Bond scenario, just feels a little wacky.

Are you all really here in 2022, being like "we can't risk a Chinese national from even seeing our American semiconductor research, they will steal it and use it against us?" Are actual scientists concerned? Or just the state, and apparently most of the fellow commenters?

Re: In the end, you're treated like a spy, says MIT scientist

#78

Quoted post unavailable.

Some of us, governments included, believe that the presumption of innocence is a fundamental right.

"That it is better 100 guilty Persons should escape than that one innocent Person should suffer, is a Maxim that has been long and generally approved."

That quote is from Benjamin Franklin, one of the founders of the US government.

Re: In the end, you're treated like a spy, says MIT scientist

#79

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Like McCarthyism it’s a noble cause I'm unsure if this is sarcasm or not.

It’s not. Why on earth would you want to have a bunch of Soviet or communist Chinese spies running around?

"McCarthyism" is a derogatory term for overzealous political witch-hunts which cause irreparable harm to honest, innocent citizens.

What you mean is counter-intelligence, and yes, that's absolutely an important thing.

Re: In the end, you're treated like a spy, says MIT scientist

#80

Note that the accusations of Dr Chen having ties to China are true. However, Dr Chen wasn’t legally required to disclose them: > Prosecutors announced that they had received new information indicating that Dr. Chen had not been obliged to disclose those affiliations, undercutting the basis of the case. In either case I believe ties to China are harmful, they are not a friendly country.

He was born there. So of course he has "ties". We can't really know if they are harmful or not without more information, but we do know they're the kind of ties that the government doesn't consider worthy of reporting...
Post reply on HN