Discourage use of Mailgun as a mail provider
71–80 of 99 posts
Re: Discourage use of Mailgun as a mail provider
#72Evan, your response was needlessly rude, and if I were Mailgun I'd let you go as a customer. The idea that you'd drop a company over this is overly dramatic. I would encourage you to be nicer to relatively low-level employees, and Joe did seem reasonably knowledgeable about Mailgun's processes
Re: Discourage use of Mailgun as a mail provider
#73Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't think I'd be happy if sales people had access to the recipient domains of my outbound emails, which seems to be suggested?
Except in this case, Mailgun is supposed to have access to this information. This is what they are used for. This sort of email from Mailgun is one of the reason you use them as a service. This comment[1] explains more, but the tl;dr is that the issues the person was emailing about are things they should be emailing about. It's actually more concerning that Evan doesn't understand what he's paying for. If he was real…
Re: Discourage use of Mailgun as a mail provider
#74Re: Discourage use of Mailgun as a mail provider
#75what is the male equivalent of Karen?
If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful.
Re: Discourage use of Mailgun as a mail provider
#76what is the male equivalent of Karen?
A decent chunk of HN commentators?
Re: Discourage use of Mailgun as a mail provider
#77Of course they have data about the customer performance, it's part of their job, it doesn't mean it has access to private data.
Re: Discourage use of Mailgun as a mail provider
#78Earlier quoted context omitted.
Counterpoint is that Mailgun likely had flagged the account (80% deliverability is bad) and wanted to open a line of communication without coming across as hostile. It wasn't a sales opportunity, it was a "you need to improve" email wrapped in a friendly opening. Evan then replied taking a hostile footing, which resulted in the sale rep backing up his opening with a list of agenda items (list cleaning, dedicated IP a…
Was it 80%* or 96%? Was Phacility paying for a dedicated IP or not? If someone from a company is lying to you then is this really an overreaction? (*Was 80% cherry-picked from a particular domain and so used in a purposefully misleading way? Should a sales rep have access to that sort of data anyway?)