Live data from Hacker News

Tesla loses U.S. designation for some advanced safety features

reuters.com

71–80 of 379 posts

Re: Tesla loses U.S. designation for some advanced safety features

#71
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because the actual change is driven by supply chain issues w/ radar gear, and the vision-is-better party line is just to make it sell better.

Can someone tell me if SpaceX's tail-landing rockets are vision-only systems? Street vehicle navigation seems at least as difficult as nailing a rocket landing.

Not a chance, at the very least they have a hot shit inertial nav unit if not a full imaging landing radar

Re: Tesla loses U.S. designation for some advanced safety features

#72
post #5

With a feature being pulled from already-sold vehicles, I wonder if this'll run into some Lemon Law issues. Because the vehicle no longer does what was sold, which is specifically protected by law in many states.

> pulled from already-sold vehicles

The radar was pulled from already ordered vehicles. The sale isn't finalized until pickup. I assume they would allow the order to be canceled at least.

Re: Tesla loses U.S. designation for some advanced safety features

#73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Tesla has been pushing camera-only autonomous driving (ditching LIDAR) since well before the chip shortage. I would assume this is part of the same drive.

As of May 2021, Tesla publicly announced they’re using lidar to develop FSD. https://www.theverge.com/2021/5/24/22451404/tesla-luminar-li...

No public announcement. They merely have some lidar equipment for testing. I'd be shocked if they haven't already had lidar units for years. After all, you can't compare your approach to lidar if you don't have a lidar unit to compare to.

Re: Tesla loses U.S. designation for some advanced safety features

#74

>removing radar sensors to transition to a camera-based Autopilot system A few weeks back, I had a terrible experience while using auto pilot. I was driving on a highway (in CA) with autopilot engaged. For the most part, there was a concrete median on the highway. Suddenly, a section came with no concrete median and a new left only turn lane gets added. For whatever reasons, autopilot thought it is a great idea to su…

Did your lane split into two and it took the left one? What do you think caused it to do what it did?

Re: Tesla loses U.S. designation for some advanced safety features

#75
post #40

This decision from Tesla is going to get people killed. Tesla owners, we should sue Tesla for this. They're going to take away features that influenced our purchasing decision with an OTA update. This should not be allowed.

This kind of nonsense isn't going to end until somebody from Tesla goes to jail for negligence or fraud. Until then, bombs away!

Re: Tesla loses U.S. designation for some advanced safety features

#76

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Tesla has been pushing camera-only autonomous driving (ditching LIDAR) since well before the chip shortage. I would assume this is part of the same drive.

https://web.archive.org/web/20210312022048/https://www.tesla... I'm pulling this from archive.org, because Tesla has removed this blogpost from their servers. As recently as March, they kept this pro-Radar blogpost up. Only now are they purging this data from their archives. Fortunately, the Internet Archive remembers the history, so they won't find it so easy to rewrite history in their favor.

You meant March 2016? I would not call that recent in the self-driving vehicle world

Re: Tesla loses U.S. designation for some advanced safety features

#77

>removing radar sensors to transition to a camera-based Autopilot system A few weeks back, I had a terrible experience while using auto pilot. I was driving on a highway (in CA) with autopilot engaged. For the most part, there was a concrete median on the highway. Suddenly, a section came with no concrete median and a new left only turn lane gets added. For whatever reasons, autopilot thought it is a great idea to su…

[deleted]

Re: Tesla loses U.S. designation for some advanced safety features

#78
post #34

So if we were going to purchase one soon, should we instead wait for this to be fixed?

There is nothing to be fixed. They are replacing radar with vision.

They're disabling some functions due to the switch and promising to bring them back with an update. So that's really a fix for something that isn't working anymore.

If those features are important to you, it makes sense to wait for the update to be released before you buy.

Don't trust a Tesla promise, wait for the feature to be there in reality. It took them a very long time to make the promised automatic wipers work last time...

Re: Tesla loses U.S. designation for some advanced safety features

#79

>removing radar sensors to transition to a camera-based Autopilot system A few weeks back, I had a terrible experience while using auto pilot. I was driving on a highway (in CA) with autopilot engaged. For the most part, there was a concrete median on the highway. Suddenly, a section came with no concrete median and a new left only turn lane gets added. For whatever reasons, autopilot thought it is a great idea to su…

Well it's still a "beta" feature, so according to Tesla you shouldn't have trusted it in the first place.

Re: Tesla loses U.S. designation for some advanced safety features

#80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My read is it's just the NHTSA not granting a certification for things it hasn't tested. Ie, "forward collision warning, lane departure warning, crash imminent braking and dynamic brake support" without radar. Tesla will release the new versions (if they haven't already), the NHTSA will test the new models, and they'll grant the "check marks" again. In other words, it's non-news (unless you happen to be planning to b…

Bear in mind, there are safety features actually being dropped for this change: https://www.tesla.com/support/transitioning-tesla-vision "Emergency Lane Departure Avoidance may be disabled at delivery"

Who is buying a car with features that "may be disabled"?
Post reply on HN