Earlier quoted context omitted.
Company which is heavily pushing lock-in shouldn't be allowed to buy ARM, since it can cause too much damage by it. Lock-in is not a driver of innovation, it's a brake on it.
I talked with you on several different platforms over years and I'm also a bit of open source zealot. But the deal is: reason why Nvidia able to keep their lock-in going for decades is because they actually do invest a lot into R&D and take risks. There simply very few companies that doing it. Big reason why Intel and AMD have their open source teams is because that's give them edge against Nvidia. All we see from Nv…
Point is, Nvidia can't be trusted not to use that anti-competitively, given their existing reputation and amount of leverage they would get on even more things. So if competition laws would have worked as intended, Nvidia wouldn't have been allowed to buy ARM.