Reminds me a bit of https://timecube.2enp.com/
Black Hat Talk About ‘Time AI’ Causes Uproar, Is Deleted by Conference
71–80 of 197 posts
Re: Black Hat Talk About ‘Time AI’ Causes Uproar, Is Deleted by Conference
#72Earlier quoted context omitted.
How much does your bullshit detector hit with their promo video? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yd_2HwAmge8
That video is amazing. The conference is really playing into Time AIs game by censoring it. Underlying the story that this new technology is just too big and too groundbreaking for the industry to accept :-D
A conference not accepting a talk is not censorship.
Re: Black Hat Talk About ‘Time AI’ Causes Uproar, Is Deleted by Conference
#73Did anyone back up the video before it got taken down?
Re: Black Hat Talk About ‘Time AI’ Causes Uproar, Is Deleted by Conference
#74Earlier quoted context omitted.
That video is amazing. The conference is really playing into Time AIs game by censoring it. Underlying the story that this new technology is just too big and too groundbreaking for the industry to accept :-D
A conference not accepting a talk is not censorship.
The conference accepted the talk. They gave the talk. The conference is now removing their videos after-the-fact. It's not hard to see how one could spin that as censorship.
Re: Black Hat Talk About ‘Time AI’ Causes Uproar, Is Deleted by Conference
#75I don't get why we give this so much attention. The authors are clearly kidding, mentally ill, or have a purpose beyond my understanding (this can't be the easiest way to launder money).
The founder is Mormon. This is how (from experience) Mormons talk. They also love talking about Da Vinci, Greek philosophers, and the founding fathers. Mix in numerology, lots of crying, and you get your typical Mormon.
Re: Black Hat Talk About ‘Time AI’ Causes Uproar, Is Deleted by Conference
#76Here's a instagram post from the founder:
https://scontent.cdninstagram.com/vp/1ba57134a58455de0595824...
Also look at his papers. He likes to draw a lot instead of doing math.
Re: Black Hat Talk About ‘Time AI’ Causes Uproar, Is Deleted by Conference
#77Earlier quoted context omitted.
The speaker('s company) paid a hefty price for him to be there to present. Black Hat doesn't wanna dissuade any other potential vendors from not giving them their money.
I feel like you could make the same case for not loudly renouncing "Time AI". If Black Hat were to stand by this sponsor, I would wonder if other potential sponsors might actively withhold funds specifically to avoid being associated with "Time AI". Like the YouTube adpocalypse -- the media storm around certain kinds of content made advertisers uncomfortable with being associated with that content.
Well part of the point with sponsors is to find someone that can make money without 'selling out' and doing major damage to themselves as a conference brand. "Time AI" isn't paying nearly enough money to be worth the damage that not renouncing them would do.
Re: Black Hat Talk About ‘Time AI’ Causes Uproar, Is Deleted by Conference
#78Earlier quoted context omitted.
But the interesting part is that at least some of the people involved in these companies seem real (e.g. https://www.linkedin.com/in/amira-val-baker-47047123/ )
One of the products seems to be real and FDA approved. https://www.drugs.com/newdrugs/fda-approves-jeuveau-prabotul...
I don’t understand what it supposedly does that’s any different/better than Botox?
Re: Black Hat Talk About ‘Time AI’ Causes Uproar, Is Deleted by Conference
#79The company has issued a "statement regarding recent allegations made at Black Hat 2019 [0]. For anyone interested, the statement links to the guy's paper [1] "where he identified the first Infinite Prime Number prediction pattern". > Utilizing multi-dimensional encryption technology, including time, music’s infinite variability, artificial intelligence, and most notably mathematical constancies to generate entangled…
Any pitch that wastes 30min to talk about primes, or that focuses on primes, is trying to scam you. You’re welcome.
Re: Black Hat Talk About ‘Time AI’ Causes Uproar, Is Deleted by Conference
#80Earlier quoted context omitted.
The paper is quite straightforward and use only math from the first or second year of the university. If you understand the word "module" and have 15 minutes to loose, give it a try. Ignoring the reference to unrelated results about prime numbers, the main idea is that to check if a number is prime: 1) First check the remainder modulo 10, modulo 9 and modulo 24. This part is correct, but it's suspicious that they was…
Thanks for the summary. > First check the remainder modulo 10, modulo 9 and modulo 24. This makes zero sense already. First, 9=3 x 3, so checking for 3 is sufficient. (Checking for 9 might be easier in decimal, but why the hell would you do cryptography in decimal?) Then there’s the 24=2 x 2 x 2 x 3. Again, why not just use 6, but even worse, there’s no new factor here that’s not already covered by 10 and 9. (And as…
Try typing two asterisks with a space in between: *