Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well that's part of it too. "A lower ratio of Android users are willing to pay than for iOS users" is a meaningless statistic for someone that wants to target people with high-end phones willing to pay. Because those ratios refer to the whole world. They do not mean "there are more iOS users willing to pay than Android users".
The number of high end phones that are iPhones is greater than the number of high end Android phones - not just percentage. Samsun is the number one maker of phones and the number one maker of high end phones - if thier average selling price per phone is still only $235 ( https://www.sammobile.com/2017/08/02/average-selling-price-s... ). Even they sell mostly low in phones. Epic didn’t even bother supporting but two…
Irrelevant for the exact same reasons as the other statistics above: selling more and more low-end phones decreases that average prize without decreasing the number of high-end customers.
> Epic didn’t even bother supporting but two Android devices at launch
You say this and link to an article that says it's some sort of exclusivity deal for the first 30 days, not actually lack of support for other devices.
Like, counting on the chance that people give credibility to a sourced comment without bothering to read the actual link? Or what was that about?