Live data from Hacker News

Facebook now denying access unless EU users opt-in to tracking

twitter.com

71–80 of 385 posts

Re: Facebook now denying access unless EU users opt-in to tracking

#71
post #25
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is no legal right to Facebook, but if Facebook wants to do business here, it has to abide by our rules. And our rules are very simple, you cannot deny service because the user doesn't allow tracking if tracking is not necessary for your service to work. And it isn't in this case, it's only necessary to deliver higher paying ads. Since they are being selective on the users they accept based on being tracked, the…

And if higher paying ads are necessary for the service to work? Or do you foresee this being like drug prices, where the US subsidizes drug development for the world?

More like how the US subsidizes weapons, dictators and armed conflict. To compare FB to medicine is kinda neat in how fucking brain dead retarded it is.

Re: Facebook now denying access unless EU users opt-in to tracking

#73
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's disconcerting to me that under the GDPR, online businesses appear to be losing the ability to deny services to a user who knowingly, and with clear consent, chooses to take personal responsibility over the data they provide to said businesses. Regardless of whether this is for the "greater good", this is deeply unsettling territory.

You're not allow to operate that way in most other businesses anyway. You can't sell leaded paint, even if clearly marked. You can't sell unsafe cars, even if you tell people that even low speed impacts will kill them. There's a ton of stuff you can't do, even with clear consent, because otherwise people who lack the means to understand the compromises or afford the safer choices will suffer.

Those are safety/environmental issues. Showing you ads based on your preferences is not.

Re: Facebook now denying access unless EU users opt-in to tracking

#74

Just after that Terms screen I got three real consent screens (including one about ads tracking and one about face recognition). I think this screen is only about the TOS update.

Same here. I think Facebook needs you to agree to the basic ToS, to then move on to your acceptance/refusal of tracking.

My guess is that "we can silently change our ToS at any time" is no longer possible, and that's why you cannot login without agreeing first.

Re: Facebook now denying access unless EU users opt-in to tracking

#75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"We require tracking to pay for the costs of providing this free service". No such thing as a free lunch.

Just because they chose a specific business model doesn't mean it's necessary. Nobody says the lunch must be free, just that not every avenue of funding is allowed.

Please read the GDPR text and then tell me where it says anything like this.

Re: Facebook now denying access unless EU users opt-in to tracking

#76
post #29
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is no legal right to Facebook, but if Facebook wants to do business here, it has to abide by our rules. And our rules are very simple, you cannot deny service because the user doesn't allow tracking if tracking is not necessary for your service to work. And it isn't in this case, it's only necessary to deliver higher paying ads. Since they are being selective on the users they accept based on being tracked, the…

It's disconcerting to me that under the GDPR, online businesses appear to be losing the ability to deny services to a user who knowingly, and with clear consent, chooses to take personal responsibility over the data they provide to said businesses. Regardless of whether this is for the "greater good", this is deeply unsettling territory.

I fail to see why. Without clauses like this, you'd be at the same place you were before, "Either agree to all of our completely invasive and probably unrelated terms, or go pound sand." The GDPR is shifting the balance of power back so that users do have some bargaining, not just the take it or leave it that's been so prevalent for so long.

Re: Facebook now denying access unless EU users opt-in to tracking

#77
post #64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm gonna guess that no, you can't. That's what I would expect from Facebook.

Greate, so now my account will just exist in some state of limbo...

Even if you can't access the link, you can definitively send them an email citing the appropriate GDPR articles and demand a way to delete the account without approving anything.

Re: Facebook now denying access unless EU users opt-in to tracking

#78
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

what? seriously? Do EU citizens have some kind of legal right to Facebook access, now? It's illegal for Facebook to not serve people they can't sell to advertisers? I'd love it if Facebook were nationalized (or destroyed), but none of the coverage of the GDPR made it sound like it was going in that direction. I thought it was just another stupid "click here to acknowledge our cookies" rule that was going to spam up t…

There is no legal right to Facebook, but if Facebook wants to do business here, it has to abide by our rules. And our rules are very simple, you cannot deny service because the user doesn't allow tracking if tracking is not necessary for your service to work. And it isn't in this case, it's only necessary to deliver higher paying ads. Since they are being selective on the users they accept based on being tracked, the…

In that case Facebook should offer user a choice between paying for the service directly or letting advertiser to do that. I doubt that any nontrivial amount of users would choose to pay even $100/year so that wouldn't change anything for Facebook. However it could be enough to comply with weird EU regulation.

Re: Facebook now denying access unless EU users opt-in to tracking

#79

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"We require tracking to pay for the costs of providing this free service". No such thing as a free lunch.

Just because they chose a specific business model doesn't mean it's necessary. Nobody says the lunch must be free, just that not every avenue of funding is allowed.

The GDPR talks about "executing a contract, which includes the provision of services" (not the exact wording, but something like that). So if you define "using the social network in return for having targeted ads displayed" as the contract, it is necessary.

> just that not every avenue of funding is allowed

Funding by targeted ads isn't illegal last time I checked.

Post reply on HN