Live data from Hacker News

Linux gaming is faster because Windows APIs are becoming Linux kernel features

xda-developers.com

691–694 of 694 posts

Re: Linux gaming is faster because Windows APIs are becoming Linux kernel features

#691

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have been told (but not confirmed) that is mandated by the HDMI mob. If you want HDMI on your TV, it cannot also have DP.

Which is kind of funny. At least, to my mind this has associated HDMI-only with the budget option (TVs), and DP with the premium tier (monitors).

I'm pretty sure TVs go higher in price than monitors - although professional monitors do put up a fight.

Re: Linux gaming is faster because Windows APIs are becoming Linux kernel features

#692
post #25

If you purpose build a Linux gaming PC, would you lean more towards AMD GPUs over Nvidia?

AMD does a lot of work to ensure their support for Linux is first-class. With the kernel now natively supporting their systems, you can expect good support. It's earned them some good will over Nvidia which has gotten better recently with the rise of AI, but still requires users to jump through a couple of hoops due to their attempts to protect their IP.

Perhaps more importantly, AMD enables others (community, Valve, etc) to do the work themselves when they have different priorities from AMD.

Re: Linux gaming is faster because Windows APIs are becoming Linux kernel features

#693
post #127

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think this gets overblown a bit. AMD is better, but Nvidia can work. There's plenty of valid reasons to put in the extra effort and go with Nvidia.

I hope this is right, because "you have to use AMD GPU" is not what people want to hear when building a PC.

That's people who are used to AMDs Windows drivers, not something that is relevant for Linux.

Re: Linux gaming is faster because Windows APIs are becoming Linux kernel features

#694

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's exactly the kind of flashy, gaming-forward distro I was drawn to as a teenager. Good times :)

I sometimes wonder if my modern machines could run Sabayon's DE with high performance.

When I wrote the comment you replied to here, I of course had Sabayon in mind.

Sabayon had some loveliness beyond that surface level, too. If the distro still existed (MocaccinoOS is a thing nowadays, but it's a completely different base), I'd probably spin it up out of nostalgia.

Post reply on HN