U.S. government will decide who gets to use GPT-5.6
661–670 of 1001 posts
Re: U.S. government will decide who gets to use GPT-5.6
#662Re: U.S. government will decide who gets to use GPT-5.6
#663Earlier quoted context omitted.
In the US is already legal. It is called lobbying.
This is such an annoying attitude. Who is against the concept of an industry being able to say “are you aware this will decimate the jobs of tens of thousands”? Catch phrases like this, I swear, are half the reason so many people have a mind an inch deep and a mile wide.
Lobbyist giving opinions, isn’t anywhere near corruption. Lobbyist giving campaign support by the $100,000 is a lot closer though.
Re: U.S. government will decide who gets to use GPT-5.6
#664Re: U.S. government will decide who gets to use GPT-5.6
#665Can anyone explain to me (a non US citizen) how this won't be found to be unconstitutional (eventually)?. I would think it falls under freedom of expression. And given the attempted classification of encryption as a munition that failed, I don't see how this can possibly last?
Well it seems both Anthropic and OpenAI are consciously choosing to do this, which means, for now, neither plan on suing. So if no one sues, how could it be unconstitutional?
Re: U.S. government will decide who gets to use GPT-5.6
#666This is regulatory capture in action. This will make it hard/impossible for new vendors to come into the market and only established companies will get to play, and charge, for LLMs. What does this mean for open source? Will it become illegal to download weights? What about train your own? Are we heading to a world where GPU use is regulated to ensure that illegal LLMs aren't being processed on your machine? More bro…
Re: U.S. government will decide who gets to use GPT-5.6
#667Earlier quoted context omitted.
How does this account for the Chinese models that are the ones people will use if they can't use OAI's or Anthropic's. Last time I checked, the US president doesn't have the ability to regulate the Chinese models. Considering this, do you still stand by your maybe?
Maybe they are looking into those too and a ban might be on the horizon. President makes their own rules now and controls the supreme court, you can't consider precedent anymore.
The administration may try, and the bigger more risk adverse companies will capitulate willingly, but its about as ineffective of a ban as you can get. It'd be like trying to ban running Linux on your home computer because it "might be able be used to conduct cyberattacks"
Re: U.S. government will decide who gets to use GPT-5.6
#668Earlier quoted context omitted.
Watch out, ive read that the US government has incarcerated people for about 50 years for doing that.
Stop spreading misinformation. They were found guilty by a jury of their peers of providing material support for terrorism[1]. They shot a cop in the neck. They coordinated on Signal to bring firearms. They didn't plan to "protest". They got off lightly. Should have been life without parole. [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_Prairieland_ICE_detention...
Re: U.S. government will decide who gets to use GPT-5.6
#669Earlier quoted context omitted.
Correction: Can you yet?
Anthropic and OpenAI: Dear Uncle Sam, it seems laptops became too powerful, can you please do something Uncle Sam: For national security reasons starting from now on every purchase of GPU model with higher than X Petaflops will need written permission by the US president Anthropic and OpenAI: Look poor citizens, we are willing to share our capacity with you in limited form, by using our LLM you can avoid spending 35…