Live data from Hacker News

I bought Friendster for $30k – Here's what I'm doing with it

ca98am79.medium.com

621–630 of 648 posts

Re: I bought Friendster for $30k – Here's what I'm doing with it

#621
post #305

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you add a web page (a PWA) to the home screen, it can do push messages on iOS since a couple of years.

nobody knows how to do this; they do know how to install an app

They make it difficult to find even if you’re looking for it.

The Apple story on PWA is “Fuck ‘em until our last breath.”

Re: I bought Friendster for $30k – Here's what I'm doing with it

#622
post #379
post #361

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have a heap of family and friends who live in a different country to me. I'd love an old school Friendster / early Facebook-style social medium where we could share posts, but the tapping mechanic makes this impractical for me.

Maybe pay them a visit.

If I could afford that I wouldn’t need a social media app.

Re: I bought Friendster for $30k – Here's what I'm doing with it

#623

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Could it be you are pushing your native app? Maybe for more control to advertising in your app, tracking, etc. Keep those nasty ad blockers out.

No. There were no ads, no invasive tracking, no obnoxious pushes to move people to native – we didn’t care which platform people used. People just genuinely prefer native apps to PWAs. This should not be a controversial statement. If you say that people prefer native desktop apps to web apps, you’ll get a lot of agreement – people complaining about Electron, Slack using up all their RAM, etc. If you say that people p…

When the Renaissance Periodization team came out with an app that was a PWA, many in the fitness community (read: not as aware of the benefits of a PWA) panned it for just being a "website" rather than an app; people don't understand PWAs or even web apps or any of the parlance we use or the differences in implementation we are so often aware of to the point of not realising how the average person views them

Re: I bought Friendster for $30k – Here's what I'm doing with it

#624
post #591
post #479

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

You broke the site guidelines badly in this thread by posting much too aggressively and crossing into personal attack. We ban accounts that do this, so please don't do it on HN. If you'd please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and stick to the rules when posting here, we'd appreciate it.

I don't see where exactly I broke the site guidelines. Was I too negative? That is a ridiculous guideline. So I'm supposed to talk positive about antisocial behavior or be quiet about it? What kind of a platform is that?

Also, I'm not sure about the personal attack and aggression. I only described search engine optimized ad spam pages with strong words. It was OP's decision to build this crap. Nobody, not even he himself argued against that these spam-pages have any value besides making him money.

I'm genuinely surprised that OP seems to not realize his past success story might be nothing to be proud of. I am also genuinely surprised that we, as a society tolerate this kind of behavior, and I actually wanted to have a discussion about this. The second post, I answered his question how I think we should deal with that and unfortunately mobbing is the only way I can think of. Again, I was open for discussion and put in alot of "I'm not sure, this is how it looks from my view" words. In the third post I tried to clarify that it's the seo ad - fueled, and that I consider that similar to littering with profit, which I guess is illegal in most countries.

A day later it still looks to me like I made a few very reasonable arguments. But sadly very little debate has been going on besides the typical low effort partisan comments. On that note, I'd like to point out that the karma system very much encourages these partisan comments, cause unfortunately solid argument are usually received much worse than snarky remarks.

Re: I bought Friendster for $30k – Here's what I'm doing with it

#625
post #599

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Please don't post ideological sermons on HN. Promoting auto-censure is also falling in ideological sermons, so this is going nowhere consistent. Only in illusion can one think to stand on apolitical and ideological-less point of view. There is a rating system, and it’s fine some posts goes down to oblivion if it doesn’t fit the majority mindset of voting users. It’s true what’s this person is doing on charitable/ben…

The guidelines apply no matter the topic; if it weren't that way, there'd be no point having them. We're here for curious conversation. Curmudgeonliness, fulmination and generic tangents are specifically off-limits here, and berating someone over personal, lawful decisions about projects and investments breaks the first rule of HN comments, which is to be kind .

You judge it in your own world view, I do with mine. I kindly disagree, and don't agree I went off the rails of kindness with my comment.

Kindness doesn't mean we should only acclaim people, and only comments on what they are asking feedback on. That yes-man attitude is all but kind to my mind.

I'm human being, I can make errors, but recommending people to step back on what they do, I don't think it is an error in general; and I'm glad when people come to me and tell me to do so.

It's easy to be trapped into a narrow view (including for me, to be perfectly clear). Arbitrary self censorship won't help humanity to make progresses on that matter, that's a strong opinion of mine. I'm open to academic or other social studies that would support a different or even more nuanced account on the matter.

Re: I bought Friendster for $30k – Here's what I'm doing with it

#626

Random idea: What if all the activity notifications arrived at the same time, eg 8pm every day? If any interactions depend on people being synchronously online together, notifications could be a strong way to make those features work when people don't have a ton of friends on this yet.

"BeReal" tried this and I thought it was pretty cool. However, it died somewhat quickly.

Re: I bought Friendster for $30k – Here's what I'm doing with it

#627
post #459

[flagged]

This is a terrible take, he actually helped me get a domain back that I'd accidentally let expire. He's a genuine person just making a business with domains, everything everyone does has some kind of compromise to it if you look closely enough.

Re: I bought Friendster for $30k – Here's what I'm doing with it

#628

Wow, the phone tap requirement, love it! And your ethics, the best part. Constructively, of course (if you care for feedback devolving ramble-y): Could almost see myself using a web app version of this for kicks. But can’t sign up for another network (though would be happy to link a self hosted project, if I could stumble through setup). Apps don’t feel private (Apple neglects to offer basic firewall/other features),…

Let's not praise a professional domain squatter for his ethics. I don't understand how this guy isn't getting laughed out of the room?

Mind clarifying?

Also discussed: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47924178

Re: I bought Friendster for $30k – Here's what I'm doing with it

#629

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wait people are upset, do the Friendster founders want their URL back?! Maybe I glossed over something

I think it was more about how the OP talks about the backstory, and likely how they got the resources to do this.

Thank you, I just asked another commenter for some more details. I don’t want to be someone who misses big points like that.

Re: I bought Friendster for $30k – Here's what I'm doing with it

#630
post #447

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'd imagine Friendster uses NFC. I developed a proof of concept of a tap-to-connect social network a couple of years ago which used NFC - on both phones you had to have the app open and press a button in the app to put it in both broadcast and receive mode, which seems like what is shown here. Some notes: - It had to be an app because the web NFC API[0] only allows a browser to act as an NFC reader rather than emulat…

There's a comment below, "I just signed up and it’s super fast. Download the app, put in your name, allow Bluetooth. No email, no password, nothing." I suppose getting special "NFC card" permissions when they already struggled to get the app in the store would have been a bit much.

Interesting. Android has a Nearby Connections API[0] which "uses a combination of Bluetooth, BLE, and Wi-Fi technologies" and appears to allow interoperability between Android and Apple devices, and Apple has a Nearby Interaction[1] which "use[s] the high-frequency capabilities of the UWB chip" but is restricted to Apple devices, so I guess it could be one of those rather than NFC.

[0] https://developers.google.com/nearby/connections/overview

[1] https://developer.apple.com/documentation/nearbyinteraction

Post reply on HN