The 'tapping phones' gimmick strikes me as something that sounds cute but will become an annoying chore that one should be able to opt out of. Particularly given various unintended side effects -- I personally wouldn't want my connection to my deceased best friend to be subject to some decay feature on a social network. And either way, it's not the core feature that will draw users to the site If you want to differen…
I bought Friendster for $30k – Here's what I'm doing with it
361–370 of 648 posts
Re: I bought Friendster for $30k – Here's what I'm doing with it
#362Good article but sorry but it should not be normalized that you have to have an iPhone to join a social network. Something clearly wrong there.
And thus ensured your social network won't have 72% of the world on it... And locally for anyone outside the USA, a far higher percentage.
Re: I bought Friendster for $30k – Here's what I'm doing with it
#363I attended a concert last night and was wishing for this exact kind of app, being able to quickly exchange a follow with someone you just met in real life but will otherwise never see again unless you specifically ask for their name/number, which is awkward. Could spawn some special relationships.
Re: I bought Friendster for $30k – Here's what I'm doing with it
#364Re: I bought Friendster for $30k – Here's what I'm doing with it
#365Earlier quoted context omitted.
I would hate it if the system removed nodes from my network without my influence. Perhaps a rules engine with user defined criteria would be useful. Ultimately, users define their network in current-day social media and the relevance of any celebrity or other person within it. 400M people still find Selena Gomez relevant to themselves - she’s simply not relevant to you. I asked Gemini very simply “is Selena Gomez rel…
Could potentially show you withering connections you havent interacted with, almost an auto recycle bin with the option to dig on there and bring it back later on but dissapear from your main radius of attention if withered.
Re: I bought Friendster for $30k – Here's what I'm doing with it
#366The 'tapping phones' gimmick strikes me as something that sounds cute but will become an annoying chore that one should be able to opt out of. Particularly given various unintended side effects -- I personally wouldn't want my connection to my deceased best friend to be subject to some decay feature on a social network. And either way, it's not the core feature that will draw users to the site If you want to differen…
The tapping phones feature wouldn't allow me to do this.
Re: I bought Friendster for $30k – Here's what I'm doing with it
#367Re: I bought Friendster for $30k – Here's what I'm doing with it
#368Wow, the phone tap requirement, love it! And your ethics, the best part. Constructively, of course (if you care for feedback devolving ramble-y): Could almost see myself using a web app version of this for kicks. But can’t sign up for another network (though would be happy to link a self hosted project, if I could stumble through setup). Apps don’t feel private (Apple neglects to offer basic firewall/other features),…
Re: I bought Friendster for $30k – Here's what I'm doing with it
#369Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think the tapping phones feature -- for initial friend creation, not upkeep -- is THE killer feature of the app. Do I want my teens on any social media apps? No. Would I let them be on Facebook of 2006, when you were just connected to your friends and family, and not influencers and "the algorithm?" Sure! That and early Instagram were great ways to keep up with real-life friends. If you made this as easy and pleasa…
My thoughts as well, I love this! Easy to do, easy to implement but hard to bypass. Also it tells me something about the network that is not vying for a slice of the attention economy and isn't going to do everything it can to keep me on the site.