Live data from Hacker News

A journey into the shaken baby syndrome/abusive head trauma controversy

cambridgeblog.org

621–630 of 639 posts

Re: A journey into the shaken baby syndrome/abusive head trauma controversy

#621
post #242

Here in Sweden I had to watch a video warning against baby shaking when my wife was pregnant with my first child. After seeing this horrible video, I waited a few hours to tell my wife that this entire thing was total bunk, and we've known it's been bunk for many years. Here in Sweden this child abduction idiocy is upheld by three doctors who all refer to each other as the experts proving baby shaking is real. It's a…

I've been made to watch a similar video here in The Netherlands. It's not bunk though. Violently shaking a baby will lead to trauma which can cause death. What this book is about is that there are other causes that can lead to the same symptoms. The video is right. Shaking a baby leads to AHT. But the reverse isn't. AHT does not mean that the baby has been shaken. There are many other causes for AHT.

I mean.. sure. But if you shoot a baby it will also harmed. Or stomp on it, or set fire to it.

So, why is this video specifically about shaking? Because of this very specific and narrow conspiracy theory that takes children away from their parents.

Re: A journey into the shaken baby syndrome/abusive head trauma controversy

#622
post #264

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> was asked to live the room while he was questioned Is that even legal ? Anyone trying to get between my kids and I is going to have a very bad day.

Sorry, you think in a case where the doctor suspects abuse, they should have to ask the kid while the potential abuser stands there next to her?

Police for example is not allowed to talk to a minor without a parent / guardian being present, I don't see how a medical professional would have that right. If there's a serious suspicion they should just get the courts involved and get a legal mandate.

Not saying I wouldn't be cooperative. If I doc wants to ask a few friendly questions that's fine without me being present, I don't consider that "getting between" me and my kids.

Re: A journey into the shaken baby syndrome/abusive head trauma controversy

#623

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Since having a kid and reading a lot I've been bothered by how clearly a lot of what is labeled as "SIDS" is pretty clearly accidental suffocation. The conclusion is impossible to escape when you begin reading about measures that have "reduced SIDS." Yet I also wonder if continuing to observe this social fiction is just a way of keeping overzealous prosecutors and other crusaders from locking up and treating as depra…

A tiny selection of the relevant literature: [1] https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0... [2] https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1046/j.1440-1754.... [3] https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12024-014-9600-5 [4] https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/143/5/e20183...

These do bolster my point but it becomes more striking in resources intended for parents where one minute they’re telling you the mechanism of SIDS is poorly understood and the next they’re giving you advice that is clearly about removing suffocation risks from the sleeping environment. Though there is similarly strange advice about “preventing shaken baby syndrome” which turns out to be just anger management tips. I guess the sensitive nature of the topic makes frank discussion difficult.

Re: A journey into the shaken baby syndrome/abusive head trauma controversy

#624

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not an expert but it seems to me you'd be making the same kind of error that the article denounces: attaching equal value to direct evidence on the one hand and inference to the best explanation on the other. If a physician does not observe tell-tale signs of suffocation in an infant, then it is not their role to say "Well, statistically speaking, or logically speaking, pretty good chance it's accidental suffocation…

Some measures that reportedly reduce “SIDS” include assembling the crib properly and not putting soft objects that could smother the baby in the crib. Risk factors include lower parental educational attainment. You tell me if I’m being unreasonable attributing a death from the crib collapsing to suffocation and not a mysterious, poorly understood disease. When a baby dies in the crib it is rare for much investigation…

I mean, I don't mind, you can attribute whatever to whatever and yeah, a crib full of plush toys doesn't seem like such a smart idea... but the question is what a doctor should do, how we want them to behave in the face of limited evidence.

Re: A journey into the shaken baby syndrome/abusive head trauma controversy

#625

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I had to put a pet down once and I was crying like a baby so maybe not I relate with much of your comment but this was something I actually considered writing before. The most drastic emotional response I've ever experienced was putting a pet down. I knew it was the right choice, planned it out, to be done at home in the back yard, his favorite place and final resting place, and even made time for one last outing t…

For me it was unexpected, through a series of very unfortunate events my inside cat got into my neighbors yard and the dog attacked it. I took her to emergency surgery, spent about $2k until the vet basically told me there was no point. They put me in a room, wrapped her in a towel, and brought her in for me to spend time with before we put her to sleep. I just remember after they put her in my arms she looked up at…

Thanks for sharing. I too get teary-eyed thinking too much about it too much, but find as time passes it's much more filled with happy thoughts as you remember back on your time together. Nothing too additive to say but just wanted to acknowledge and voice respect for sharing in your experience, it's crazy how deep those relationships can be. I actually do believe they're pretty damn smart and that final eye gaze had a lot of love embedded. I have same, and it felt like he was saying "it's time, I'm ready" which is probably in my mind but that's the reality I choose for myself lol

Re: A journey into the shaken baby syndrome/abusive head trauma controversy

#626
post #572

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Of course, this can be, like in this case, wrongly applied to disastrous effects. But it has also saved many children from abusive parents So what is the relative frequency of these two outcomes? You can't ignore the wrong applications; if they outnumber the proper ones, then the system is doing more harm than good.

I don't know, but this particular case is actually quite uncommon. I forgot to mention this, but apart from everything else, this is a case where the justice system actually followed the opinions and recommendations of actual experts - except that those experts seem to be very wrong on this topic. So, in this particular case, I would say that the justice system did it's job quite well, and it's a massive failure of t…

"The system" is not just the justice system. If the justice system is relying on wrong evaluations by experts, that's still the system doing harm instead of good. And if it is known that so-called "experts" in a field can get things this wrong, the justice system should not be relying on their confident assertions.

Re: A journey into the shaken baby syndrome/abusive head trauma controversy

#627

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Some measures that reportedly reduce “SIDS” include assembling the crib properly and not putting soft objects that could smother the baby in the crib. Risk factors include lower parental educational attainment. You tell me if I’m being unreasonable attributing a death from the crib collapsing to suffocation and not a mysterious, poorly understood disease. When a baby dies in the crib it is rare for much investigation…

I mean, I don't mind, you can attribute whatever to whatever and yeah, a crib full of plush toys doesn't seem like such a smart idea... but the question is what a doctor should do, how we want them to behave in the face of limited evidence.

SIDS is intended as a diagnosis of last resort but is often used with little digging so it's not really any different than the case this article discusses, except with the opposite result. I never demanded that doctors start doing something different but I think it's pretty obvious we're just collectively leaving some stones unturned here.

Re: A journey into the shaken baby syndrome/abusive head trauma controversy

#628

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There are a lot of really good benefits to breastfeeding but it's not going to work for everybody or in every situation. I wouldn't fault a doctor for recommending it, but they shouldn't make someone feel bad if it isn't working out. I want recommendations and best practices to change as our understanding of things improve though. The alternative would mean that either no more research is being done, or doctors are j…

Our doctor was fine with it. The nurse called formula poison.

> The nurse called formula poison. An absolutely gross and ridiculous position.

Re: A journey into the shaken baby syndrome/abusive head trauma controversy

#629

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Priors should never, ever factor into it like this. I was a foster child who was taken from my parents wrongly. A third party (not connected to child services) made a false accusation to the cops, who took me and turned me over to child services without any investigation. Even though I insisted nothing had happened and even though child services failed to produce any evidence (beyond aforesaid hearsay) over the cours…

Have you considered suing the third party that made a false accusation? It seems that they’ve caused suffering and irreparable long term harm. This sounds like something that may have a standing. Perhaps you can sue them and either get some material compensation (if they are well to do) put them through a few rounds of trials in another state or something (if they are poor, this will be a good punishment in itself).…

We never found out who did it. It was an anonymous accusation. It could have been a stranger on the street, for all we know.

We don't even know if it was an intentional lie or if they genuinely thought I had been hurt. We never found out what they told the cops.

Re: A journey into the shaken baby syndrome/abusive head trauma controversy

#630

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Have you considered suing the third party that made a false accusation? It seems that they’ve caused suffering and irreparable long term harm. This sounds like something that may have a standing. Perhaps you can sue them and either get some material compensation (if they are well to do) put them through a few rounds of trials in another state or something (if they are poor, this will be a good punishment in itself).…

We never found out who did it. It was an anonymous accusation. It could have been a stranger on the street, for all we know. We don't even know if it was an intentional lie or if they genuinely thought I had been hurt. We never found out what they told the cops.

:(

Anonymous accusations really should have no place in this.

Post reply on HN