Live data from Hacker News

When AI Builds Itself: Our progress toward recursive self-improvement

anthropic.com

611–620 of 738 posts

Re: When AI Builds Itself: Our progress toward recursive self-improvement

#611
post #329

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> https://fxtwitter.com What is this?

Proxy that makes Twitter links embed on discord, for whatever reason. Something about api access without accounts I assume

It used to allow reading replies without being signed in.

Not sure what changed, but now it just redirects me to x.com.

Re: When AI Builds Itself: Our progress toward recursive self-improvement

#612

I don't quite understand the intent of such article other than to promote themselves given an odd timing that the company is planning on going public, so I can only conclude that this is just part of the IPO roadshow. LLMs certainly have made significant changes to our lives, but I haven't yet to see any extraordinary improvement it brought to me which makes me skeptical about their claims. _if_ it solves many of our…

Truly feels like witnessing the worst of capitalism and greed play out. All that compute and energy towards a narrative of reducing the need for skilled programmers. What a waste. These people don't have our interests in mind and everyone eats it up like a blessing from a god or something. It's surreal.

It's our collective God complex playing out and eating us up

Re: When AI Builds Itself: Our progress toward recursive self-improvement

#613

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's a process problem at your company - no developer should be proposing branches over 1k loc (or whatever your agreed tolerance threshold is) without a very good reason, vibe coded or not.

> no developer should be proposing branches over 1k loc I've seen that reaction many times. It seems to work well enough when someone is maintaining existing code. However, greenfield projects can often require literally orders of magnitude more code to deliver something that can be integration tested. The first step is to break it up into a stack of commits. Each one must compile and pass its unit tests, of course.…

I mean, you're not creating the api from thin air as you write code right? Usually you'd have some larger doc about the project with the design you can point to.

Re: When AI Builds Itself: Our progress toward recursive self-improvement

#614

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And how would you verify that the review was accurate?

Claude to the rescue

Claude Van Damme ?

I'd prefer Chuck to the rescue but I guess it's a cultural preference.

/s

Re: When AI Builds Itself: Our progress toward recursive self-improvement

#615
post #155

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In this world we've had an inocculation event against use of nukes. Two were dropped, people have seen how abhorrent their use is and collectively decided that they shouldn't be used. If in the WW2 Japan also had nukes (and delivery systems for them) they'd probably have retaliated in kind and US wouldn't let that slide too and it would have continued for some time.

If WW2 Japan also had nukes the US would never drop those two. That's the whole idea behind MAD. Probably the only thing that stopped an open conflict between the US and USSR was them being nuclear powers and both sides being scared that eventually push comes to shove.

MAD was thought of later and its theory requires that all parties know of each others' arsenal, think that their enemies aren't going to use them first and there being enough of weapons to make end quick and certain. I have hard time seeing WW2 generals who've seen horror and made horror coming to the conclusion that "they aren't going to use it unless we do, so let's not".

Re: When AI Builds Itself: Our progress toward recursive self-improvement

#616
I'm so sick of this anthropics marketing stuff... claude is an ultra-success (according to claude judge), “good code”, bragging about creating 8x more bugs and tech-debt. claude writes code that works, yeah, sure anthropic, we saw that claude code leaks, some amazingly "good" code in there

Re: When AI Builds Itself: Our progress toward recursive self-improvement

#617
post #604

It makes me wonder that despite the fast improvements in model capacity (and the claims) we're still using variations on a 9-year old architecture. How is it that we haven't been able to use LLMs to actually improve that?

[flagged]

Re: When AI Builds Itself: Our progress toward recursive self-improvement

#618

I don't quite understand the intent of such article other than to promote themselves given an odd timing that the company is planning on going public, so I can only conclude that this is just part of the IPO roadshow. LLMs certainly have made significant changes to our lives, but I haven't yet to see any extraordinary improvement it brought to me which makes me skeptical about their claims. _if_ it solves many of our…

Because they're going after the biggest problem of all first: labor costs. /s but not to a lot of people

[deleted]

Re: When AI Builds Itself: Our progress toward recursive self-improvement

#619

Earlier quoted context omitted.

AI always does this in the public sphere and software is particularly susceptible because there's no key metric to measure productivity and people obviously have vested emotional interests in the technology failing. On the other side people are always keen to show off their alignment with the new hotness, be that OOP, Agile, Functional, Ruby, web tech, js frameworks, Rust or agentic work today. Somewhere in the middl…

It also doesn’t help that the middle of the road, realistic reaction to it is “it’s aight” and that’s just not a discussion worthy response.

and that stating such an opinion will still garner you hostility in the public sphere: "what do you mean; you don't hate it?!?!? it uses so much water...."

Re: When AI Builds Itself: Our progress toward recursive self-improvement

#620

Earlier quoted context omitted.

this allows for comfortable ergonomics IMO not that it could be leaner for sure but i get the reasoning behind the tui rendering layer

comfortable ergonomics? you can't scroll up more than 50 lines before it starts to garble up text i'd be ashamed of publishing software with this level of polish as a solo dev, let alone as the hottest multibillion startup on the planet

Hmm I thought this was due to me using tmux with claude-code, also it seems that `claude agents` doesn't have this issue.

By comfortable ergonomics, meant the forgiving and asynchronous input system. You can start typing, cancel, retry with previous input, accumulate messages while the agent is active. I don't know all TUIs but this is not common IMO.

Other than that I agree with you.

Post reply on HN