Live data from Hacker News

Nano Banana Pro

blog.google

611–620 of 718 posts

Re: Nano Banana Pro

#611
post #483

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you feel the same way about VFX (marvel etc) or animated movies (pixar etc)

I do. I miss practical effects; they were much more entertaining.

I don’t, they seem campy and reduce the gravitas compared to very well done CGI. Infact, I feel like it has the same effect at poorly done CGI.

Re: Nano Banana Pro

#612

2D animators can still feel safe about their job, I asked it to generate a sprite sheet animation by giving it the final frame of the animation (as a PNG file) and asking in detail what I wanted in the spritesheet, it just gave me mediocre results, I asked for 8 frames and it just repeated a bunch of poses just to reach that number instead of doing what a human would have done with the same request, meaning the in-be…

However, if you ask it to generate eight or 10 frames of a sprite performing a particular action from scratch it gets it pretty spot on. In fact, you can drop them straight into an animator and have near production quality.

Re: Nano Banana Pro

#613

The interesting tidbit here is SynthID. While a good first step, it doesn't solve the problem of AI generated content NOT having any kind of watermark. So we can prove that something WITH the ID is AI generated but we can't prove that something without one ISN'T AI generated. Like it would be nice if all photo and video generated by the big players would have some kind of standardized identifier on them - but now you…

I'm sure Apple will roll something out in the coming years. Now that just anyone can easily AI themselves into a picture in front of the Eiffel tower, they'll want a feature that will let their users prove that they _really_ took that photo in front of the Eiffel tower (since to a lot of people sharing that you're on a Paris vacation is the point, more than the particular photo). I bet it will be called "Real Photos"…

This exists, the standard is called C2PA, Google added support for it in the Pixel 10. I was surprised and disappointed that Apple didn’t add support for it in the most recent iPhone! A few physical cameras are starting to support it too (https://yawnbox.eu/blog/c2pa-camera/)

Re: Nano Banana Pro

#614
post #193

This thing's ability to produce entire infographics from a short prompt is really impressive, especially since it can run extra Google searches first. I tried this prompt: Infographic explaining how the Datasette open source project works Here's the result: https://simonwillison.net/2025/Nov/20/nano-banana-pro/#creat...

It would be great if Google could make SynthID openly available so OpenAI etc could also implement it. Then websites like Facebook, or even local browsers, could implement an "AI warning".

Re: Nano Banana Pro

#615

The interesting tidbit here is SynthID. While a good first step, it doesn't solve the problem of AI generated content NOT having any kind of watermark. So we can prove that something WITH the ID is AI generated but we can't prove that something without one ISN'T AI generated. Like it would be nice if all photo and video generated by the big players would have some kind of standardized identifier on them - but now you…

This is what the SynthID signature looks like on Nano Banana images https://www.reddit.com/r/nanobanana/comments/1o1tvbm/

And if it can be seen like that, it should be removeable too. There are more examples in that thread.

Re: Nano Banana Pro

#616

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Lol. Since the GirlsGoneWild people pioneered the concept of automatically-recurring subscriptions, unexpected charges and difficult-to-cancel billing is the game. The best customer is always the one that pays but never uses the service ... and ideally has forgotten or lost access to the email address they used when signing up.

> or lost access to the email address they used when signing up. Since Gmail controls access to tens of millions of people's email, I'm seeing potential for some cross-team synergy here!

tens of millions? I think you're severely underestimating it.

Re: Nano Banana Pro

#617

Google has been stomping around like Godzilla this week, and this is the first time I decided to link my card to their AI studio. I had seen people saying that they gave up and went to another platform because it was "impossible to pay". I thought this was strange, but after trying to get a working API key for the past half hour, I see what they mean. Everything is set up, I see a message that says "You're using Paid…

You should try contacting customer service.

Re: Nano Banana Pro

#618
post #196

It's crazy how good these models are at text now. Remember when text was literally impossible? Now the models can diagetically render any text. It's so good now that it seems like a weird blip that it _wasn't_ possible before. Not to mention all the other stuff.

I wonder; do you think these LLMs now rather have text tools, or is this still straight out of the neural network? If its the latter, thats incredibly impressive.

Re: Nano Banana Pro

#619

Google needs to pace themselves. AI studio, Antigravity, Banana, Banana Pro, Grape Ultra, Gemini 3, etc. This information overload don't do them any good whatsoever.

I mean, you gotta diversify your portfolio so later on you can push some of them to the graveyard.

/s

Re: Nano Banana Pro

#620
Generated images still contain JPEG artifacts all over them.

We are not doomed yet - can pretty much reliably spot RAW image vs AI-generated image by just zooming in

Post reply on HN