Live data from Hacker News

Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky

theverge.com

611–620 of 855 posts

Re: Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky

#611

I remain surprised at how casually people will step over the free speech dead body so they can hate on people the media at large has maligned. Regardless of what you think of Musk, where's your outrage over this blatant authoritarianism?

There is little authoritarianism in the decision to block access to X. Brazilian law, properly drafted and passed by two independent legislative chambers, dictates several important things: - foreign companies that operate in Brazil must have a representative there. - all constitutional rights are to be equally protected, meaning that there are no absolute rights, such as freedom of speech. - websites have to comply…

[dead]

Re: Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky

#612

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you not have some sort of expedited appeals process in Brazil to short circuit maverick judges like this?

This is a Justice from the brazilian Supreme Court, they are the highest position in the court system, and allowed to make individual rulings and apply sanctions like this. These decisions hold until ratified or rejected by the court as a whole (which they all eventually will, but it's not fast) or successfully appealed. Appeals can be made only to another Justice or to the court as a whole - no expedited process, be…

[deleted]

Re: Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky

#613

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As an outsider, I can't help but feel that the American election system that boils everything down to just two parties imposes a limited binary lens onto at least the American view of the world.

> As an outsider, I can't help but feel that the American election system that boils everything down to just two parties imposes a limited binary lens onto at least the American view of the world. I don't think that the American election system holds any relevance to the problem. The problem is fueling divisiveness to manipulate people with a "us vs them" mentality. How else can you force working class people to vote…

My wife is a nationally recognized expert in elections in the US. The combination of FPTP and politically controlled district geometry (gerrymandering) explicitly creates a brittle system that engenders extremism. It's well understood to be both the cause and a reinforcement mechanism. The mechanism we have now was left in place in the early 19th c. explicitly to allow a small minority to be able to control their individual states. The main change since then has been cross-state unification of the party system. To give an example: here, in Texas, the most volatile Federal district was won by a representative who received only 10% of the votes in his district. Some districts were won by reps with as few as 1% of the total votes (that's total turnout). (This is due to the primary mechanism and gerrymandering.) If you can win by harnessing just 10% of the electorate, you're shopping around for the ironclad voters, and they tend to have weird views (left or right).

Re: Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky

#614
post #594

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You keep saying “we”. Do you work for X, formerly Twitter? If not, who exactly are you? If you’re in any way related to the case or the companies or governments involved, there’s a major conflict of interest in this conversation and your defences. It’s good form to disclose those so that potential biases can be properly taken into consideration.

Huh? I said: "Quoting from X post below" and I literally quoted the X post. WTF are you talking about?

My mistake, I thought I saw the quote only on the first paragraph. Tangentially, this is why using > is generally better for long quoting sections.

Re: Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky

#615

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I can only imagine what this refers to but after googling for a few minutes for "bluesky japan controversy" I'm just going to let this exchange color my impression of what's going on at bluesky: > Deleted Post >> Katie Tightpussy: BLACKTHORNE: We are a moderation service for Bluesky with the goal of improving social media for progressive queer folks and leftists who wholeheartedly enjoy Japanese anime, manga, games,…

yeaaaahhh, it can't get more appropriate than to frame this problem with an image of an angry short ethnic woman in front of a tall white male guardian, right... and it's totally fine that no one in said ethnicity interacts with that post over there, right...? At that point you might as well include topics like mercury content in Asian seaweeds and arsenic in rice... duh. The reason why you aren't finding anything sp…

Your broader observations match what I generally know, but the moderation system wasn’t created as a reaction to Japan or any other specific set of circumstances we were facing. It was a system we had been developing since before launch and was designed to resolve the tensions of different perspectives in what’s acceptable

Re: Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky

#616

I’m glad I don’t live in Brazil. Why ban X? It makes no sense.

People used it to organize an attempted coup against a democratically elected government and twitter is not cooperating with the investigation.

I don't see how that argument would leave coffee shops and other gathering places able to stay open during elections.

Re: Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky

#617
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Citation needed. I know tons of people who have chosen to leave Twitter since Elon took over

Objectively, if Twitter is banned in your country, you were not given a choice in the matter.

That wasn't the claim. The claim was that people aren't leaving voluntarily, which simply isn't true. Lots of people have voluntarily left Twitter since Musk took over (About 23% DAU, a ~50 million drop) and that's before Brazil banned it

That people are also leaving because of twitter being banned in their country isn't relevant to the original claim

Re: Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky

#618

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Looking at the responses, I can see that people are still viewing this through the limited lens of left vs right. This is of course a thing in that nobody can hide their colors anymore, but I'm specifically talking about the rich now feeling empowered enough that they even have the hubris to challenge governments of the world for their own benefit, and in some cases even build their own empires to escape the limitati…

You got to be kidding me... Prospera / Honduras is nothing . It doesn't register. Libertarians, sadly I'd add, shall never ever have an ounce of success: all the powers that be in this world are out there to crush liberties, everywhere, worldwide. Meanwhile The New York Times is titling an article: "The constitution is scared, but is it dangerous?" There's nothing more belonging to the rich than the mainstream media,…

I'm not an American but

> congress to ban guns

This sounds desperately needed and like an exceptionally great idea to most people that don't live inside the US bubble.

Maybe broaden your horizons a bit?

Re: Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky

#619
post #76

Copying over my latest backend status update; figure folks would find it interesting Servers are holding up so far! Fortunately we were overprovisioned. If we hit 4mm new signups then things should get interesting. We did have some degradations (user handles entering an invalid state, event-stream crashed a couple times, algo crashed a couple times, image servers hit bad latencies) but we managed to avoid a full outa…

[deleted]

Re: Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky

#620

I'm from Brazil and this judge is totally out of control. I agree that X needs to have a legal representative in Brazil, this is correct anywhere, but he threatened a fine of 200k and imprisonment to the person Musk appointed as representative if his stricture orders were not complied with. He threatened us to pay $9k in fines per day if we use VPN to access X. Unless you are part of the government base, it is diffic…

[deleted]
Post reply on HN