I remain surprised at how casually people will step over the free speech dead body so they can hate on people the media at large has maligned. Regardless of what you think of Musk, where's your outrage over this blatant authoritarianism?
There is little authoritarianism in the decision to block access to X. Brazilian law, properly drafted and passed by two independent legislative chambers, dictates several important things: - foreign companies that operate in Brazil must have a representative there. - all constitutional rights are to be equally protected, meaning that there are no absolute rights, such as freedom of speech. - websites have to comply…
Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky
611–620 of 855 posts
Re: Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky
#612Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do you not have some sort of expedited appeals process in Brazil to short circuit maverick judges like this?
This is a Justice from the brazilian Supreme Court, they are the highest position in the court system, and allowed to make individual rulings and apply sanctions like this. These decisions hold until ratified or rejected by the court as a whole (which they all eventually will, but it's not fast) or successfully appealed. Appeals can be made only to another Justice or to the court as a whole - no expedited process, be…
Re: Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky
#613Earlier quoted context omitted.
As an outsider, I can't help but feel that the American election system that boils everything down to just two parties imposes a limited binary lens onto at least the American view of the world.
> As an outsider, I can't help but feel that the American election system that boils everything down to just two parties imposes a limited binary lens onto at least the American view of the world. I don't think that the American election system holds any relevance to the problem. The problem is fueling divisiveness to manipulate people with a "us vs them" mentality. How else can you force working class people to vote…
Re: Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky
#614Earlier quoted context omitted.
You keep saying “we”. Do you work for X, formerly Twitter? If not, who exactly are you? If you’re in any way related to the case or the companies or governments involved, there’s a major conflict of interest in this conversation and your defences. It’s good form to disclose those so that potential biases can be properly taken into consideration.
Huh? I said: "Quoting from X post below" and I literally quoted the X post. WTF are you talking about?
Re: Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky
#615Earlier quoted context omitted.
I can only imagine what this refers to but after googling for a few minutes for "bluesky japan controversy" I'm just going to let this exchange color my impression of what's going on at bluesky: > Deleted Post >> Katie Tightpussy: BLACKTHORNE: We are a moderation service for Bluesky with the goal of improving social media for progressive queer folks and leftists who wholeheartedly enjoy Japanese anime, manga, games,…
yeaaaahhh, it can't get more appropriate than to frame this problem with an image of an angry short ethnic woman in front of a tall white male guardian, right... and it's totally fine that no one in said ethnicity interacts with that post over there, right...? At that point you might as well include topics like mercury content in Asian seaweeds and arsenic in rice... duh. The reason why you aren't finding anything sp…
Re: Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky
#616I’m glad I don’t live in Brazil. Why ban X? It makes no sense.
People used it to organize an attempted coup against a democratically elected government and twitter is not cooperating with the investigation.
Re: Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky
#617Earlier quoted context omitted.
Citation needed. I know tons of people who have chosen to leave Twitter since Elon took over
Objectively, if Twitter is banned in your country, you were not given a choice in the matter.
That people are also leaving because of twitter being banned in their country isn't relevant to the original claim
Re: Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky
#618Earlier quoted context omitted.
Looking at the responses, I can see that people are still viewing this through the limited lens of left vs right. This is of course a thing in that nobody can hide their colors anymore, but I'm specifically talking about the rich now feeling empowered enough that they even have the hubris to challenge governments of the world for their own benefit, and in some cases even build their own empires to escape the limitati…
You got to be kidding me... Prospera / Honduras is nothing . It doesn't register. Libertarians, sadly I'd add, shall never ever have an ounce of success: all the powers that be in this world are out there to crush liberties, everywhere, worldwide. Meanwhile The New York Times is titling an article: "The constitution is scared, but is it dangerous?" There's nothing more belonging to the rich than the mainstream media,…
> congress to ban guns
This sounds desperately needed and like an exceptionally great idea to most people that don't live inside the US bubble.
Maybe broaden your horizons a bit?
Re: Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky
#619Copying over my latest backend status update; figure folks would find it interesting Servers are holding up so far! Fortunately we were overprovisioned. If we hit 4mm new signups then things should get interesting. We did have some degradations (user handles entering an invalid state, event-stream crashed a couple times, algo crashed a couple times, image servers hit bad latencies) but we managed to avoid a full outa…
Re: Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky
#620I'm from Brazil and this judge is totally out of control. I agree that X needs to have a legal representative in Brazil, this is correct anywhere, but he threatened a fine of 200k and imprisonment to the person Musk appointed as representative if his stricture orders were not complied with. He threatened us to pay $9k in fines per day if we use VPN to access X. Unless you are part of the government base, it is diffic…