Live data from Hacker News

Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users to start paying

9to5google.com

611–620 of 1001 posts

Re: Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users to start paying

#611
For those running custom domains and feeling pinched, check out improveMX: https://improvmx.com/

I've been using them for a while for a side project email that sends/receives through a free Gmail account and it works well.

I've worked with email for a while and was surprised by how easy it was to set up.

Re: Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users to start paying

#612
post #452

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The long-tail isn't being considered here IMO. Dyn.com (nee DynDNS, in the dialup days) was bought out by Oracle, my nearly 20 year old lifetime VIP account will be terminated in May despite using a few thousand requests per month and in the past highly recommending their extortionately priced but rather excellent global load balancer and enterprise anycast services (to the tune of thousands of dollars per month). Li…

Identical situations, VIP dyndns, all Nexus phones, 3 Pixels and google apps. On the plus side, I can't think of any other free service I use. (Damn, just remembered I use the hobbyist license for fusion360, they are slowly crippling that but not a big bang). What are you going to do for DNS? I just got static DNS for home so I guess I could host my own DNS but the custom gapps domain mail will be a hassle. Maybe jus…

Check out https://improvmx.com/

Re: Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users to start paying

#613
post #452

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Identical situations, VIP dyndns, all Nexus phones, 3 Pixels and google apps. On the plus side, I can't think of any other free service I use. (Damn, just remembered I use the hobbyist license for fusion360, they are slowly crippling that but not a big bang). What are you going to do for DNS? I just got static DNS for home so I guess I could host my own DNS but the custom gapps domain mail will be a hassle. Maybe jus…

So I own the domains, I can register them for 10 years at a time with ICANN, with that I can switch providers at will. Most of the reputable domain registrars have been around for the past 20 years and offer free basic DNS hosting... All I need is a MX record. Next step is buying IP space, that's a lot more expensive with the yearly AS fees, I'm not sure I can afford that, and ARIN/RIPE seem just as bad as the [PS]aa…

Posted this on a few comments because I find them really helpful: https://improvmx.com/

Re: Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users to start paying

#614
post #553

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hmmm, SendGrid offers 100 sends per day for free and their "API" has an SMTP feature. I'm sure there are others. SMTP relay for outbound? I'm thinking of giving it a go.

I'm building out iredmail on my VPS now, to try this.

well.. to report back there are minor nits in the docs about "how to do it" but I succeeded in getting DKIM/SPF done, and google and pobox both honoured it for delivery which is something. (I used the google postmaster doorway to prove control of the domain)

I think this approach may be viable.

Re: Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users to start paying

#615

I'm definitely getting screwed over by this. I've hosted close friend's and family's email for a decade now on an old G Apps instance. We only ever used it for email on a custom domain. It was most useful because I could reset passwords for them if they forgot it. Now I'm going to have to figure out what to do. Microsoft's Family offering is way better (not saying much considering Google doesn't have one). Right now…

Having used Microsoft Outlook for personal use and Gmail for work, the UI for Google is so much better. Much less clutter IMO.

Re: Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users to start paying

#616
post #521
post #504

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> In particular, the short notice period (3 months + 2 months grace) for something people have been using for a decade is jarring. For me, this raises the obvious question. How long a notice period is long enough? Six months? Eight? A year? Five years? A decade? I think we can all agree that a decade would be an excessive and unreasonable expectation. > By the same token, people have been using free Gmail accounts fo…

> Which is to say incredibly hostile because people have come to view free Gmail accounts as a basic public service for which no payment will ever be required under any circumstances. which is called entitlement. And i'm seeing more and more of this sense of entitlement as more and more people (esp. young people) being exposed to the internet - and this seeps into their other lives offline.

I don't think so and I'm not a fan of the "(esp. young people)" notion.

Since I can remember email services across Microsoft, Yahoo and Google have been free. It is completely okay for us to expect that to continue as it has been around for so long. Now if you want perhaps more premium features, or access to the entire suite of product then yes it is expected you would need to pay.

Let's not act like providing users with free email hasn't been beneficial for these companies either.

Re: Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users to start paying

#617

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Back when I was using Apple I paid for an @mac.com address. I could get used to paying for email again, though I may be in the minority there. Although being a paid product didn't stop Apple from killing it.

> Although being a paid product didn't stop Apple from killing it. ? Email to whoever@mac.com is still working as far as I know, and I send emails to a couple of people who still use mac.com addresses all the time (whoever@icloud.com also works). https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT201771

Also @me.com. Apple have some sick domains!

Re: Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users to start paying

#618
I've left Gmail and Google Apps (with my domain) long ago. If you need to pay anyway and are looking for email I recommend Microsoft Exchange Online. They're doing a shit job in marketing it, but $4 a month for Exchange email with immediate push to iPhone/iPad etc, good anti spam filtering and no Google profile building is worth it for me.

Re: Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users to start paying

#619
OK, this is annoying but it looks like there's a combination of features that allows me to continue using my domain as an alias for my @gmail.com account, including being able to send mail using the alias:

1. Email forwarding: https://support.google.com/domains/answer/3251241?authuser=1...

2. Send as alias: https://support.google.com/domains/answer/9437157?authuser=1

I think this will actually end up being a better set up for my usage than GAFYD was.

Re: Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users to start paying

#620

I'm definitely getting screwed over by this. I've hosted close friend's and family's email for a decade now on an old G Apps instance. We only ever used it for email on a custom domain. It was most useful because I could reset passwords for them if they forgot it. Now I'm going to have to figure out what to do. Microsoft's Family offering is way better (not saying much considering Google doesn't have one). Right now…

You're complaining that a service you use all the time for a decade for free now might cost the equivalent of a cup of coffee per month? I'm all about Google being evil and all that, but spending valuable aggression on this seems a bit excessive.. The Google Takeout system gives you all of your email in a format you might be able to import into another system?

Takeout is a terriffic service, but not a great way of doing this. It will actually create additional work. When you set up the new microsoft account you can simply migrate all calendars, contacts and mail as part of the setup. [1]

A lot of people are talking about entitlement and saying how people shouldn't complain when free stuff goes away. I think those people are missing the point. Google is an incredibly profitable company and it would cost them almost nothing to continue to offer this service. By choosing not to, they piss people off (rightly or wrongly) and won't make much of anything in return. We can speculate about how they got to a place where maintaining this service was painful enough to justify doing that, but from the outside it seems like a poor decision that is hostile to users and antithetical to how they used to do things. That plays into the narrative that this ain't your mamma's google any more and something cool about the 2000s spirit has passed away.

[1] https://support.microsoft.com/en-gb/office/import-gmail-to-o...

Post reply on HN