Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

A/I shuts down

keepitfree.ai

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

601–610 of 648 posts

Re: A/I shuts down

#601

Post by selfhoster1312 »

parineum wrote: post #499
jgtrosh wrote: post #268

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consensus_decision-making alternative political movements care a lot about how decisions are taken. For instance, authors like David Graeber consider that majority voting only makes sense in the context if backed by violence.

So what percent of people are required for "consensus" because it seems like 50%+1 to 100%. There seems to also be an implication that democracy is 50+1 when it isn't. It can require any percentage to reach a decision. Those two words refer to the same "type" of system where the members make a decision by ascent or descent. Both systems require an agreed upon barrier of acceptance. They are the same. The US congress…

Consensus is strictly 100% agreement (or at least 0% disagreement). Granted, it's not always possible. But in some setups and given some objectives, it's sometimes possible to have a collective that finds compromises that satisfy everyone (consensus).

Re: A/I shuts down

#602

Post by InsideOutSanta »

pessimizer wrote: post #401
einpoklum wrote: post #346

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> This is why Europe needs to detach itself from the American banking system. So far, what it's detached itself from its sources of fossil fuels. With a little help from its great American friends.

I love how Europeans get pumped up on anti-American rhetoric when they are far more submissive to the US than even a Ukraine or a South Korea is. I'm starting to think the rhetoric (always about what they're about to do, something about Trump, something about Musk) is being pumped to them by US admin think tanks. The US is going to be at peace with Russia, and still pumping anti-Russian rhetoric into Europe to keep t…

I think what you're missing is that for many Western European countries, like Germany, suddenly gaining a direct border with Russia is a genuine concern. It's not just rhetoric; it's the real world.

It's easy for Americans, who are essentially uninvadable, to discount this as just people saying stuff, but in Europe, we actually have to live with Russia's direct military threat.

Re: A/I shuts down

#603

Post by selfhoster1312 »

mitxela wrote: post #503
postit wrote: post #287

I'm wondering how long until they target CCC :/

That'll be fun. But the CCC doesn't engage in resistance any more. They mostly just hold the conferences where people tinker with stuff in ways that don't matter .

Well A/I doesn't engage in resistance either. All they did was provide email services and host blogs for people. By this standard, Wikipedia or CCC could indeed be next.

Re: A/I shuts down

#604

Post by selfhoster1312 »

dash2 wrote: post #387
linuxhansl wrote: post #205

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Never heard of A/I and I have no idea what they are about, but rather than a government communication this statement reads like an angry rant with lots of unhelpful name-calling. I would expect a government to be professional and just stick to the (proven) facts and avoiding labels; that would also be more convincing. Oh well.

Really? > The anarchist cells responsible for sabotaging rail systems across France, Italy, Germany, and the Netherlands in 2026, relied on A/I Collective tools and services to claim responsibility for the attacks, publish official communiqués, and disseminate manuals for constructing improvised incendiary devices to target railways and other critical infrastructure. > The anarchist cell responsible for sabotaging th…

Is the car manufacturer responsible for their use of a car? The power tools manufacturer? The paper sheet manufacturer? The restaurant that fed them?

Technical intermediaries could be held responsible specifically for hosting the manifestos (under freedom of the press laws), but that requires an actual due process. Meanwhile, 100% of the authors and websites who inspired or relayed Anders Brejvik and other neo-fascist terrorists are still online and are not facing any kind of repression.

Re: A/I shuts down

#605

Post by selfhoster1312 »

SV_BubbleTime wrote: post #549
lokar wrote: post #380

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Has any terrorist group ever used Gmail to communicate?

Is Gmail used for anything else? Lots, right? Now, what about A/I group? Ah… well, there is your answer.

> Now, what about A/I group?

Yes, in my local food distribution networks here in France, quite a few people had autistici emails registered on our mailing list.

Don't talk about something you don't know like you do and you're smarter than anyone.

Re: A/I shuts down

#606

Post by selfhoster1312 »

Cider9986 wrote: post #72

>Sorry, but we don’t accept Bitcoin. https://www.inventati.org/donate Should have focused on Monero donations from the get-go. Banks are a plague. Like what is a group like this using banks for or at least diversifying?? It's like choosing not to use E2EE. It's not even left political groups that get debanked or screwed—it's everyone often. Even GrapheneOS, but intelligently, they use crypto heavily: >Unfortunately,…

The problem with repression is not financial. Since A/I's goal was never to make profit, Bitcoin can't do anything to help them.

Re: A/I shuts down

#607

Post by claykkari »

mapontosevenths wrote: post #566
13415 wrote: post #253

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's defined in the UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. Long title but the document is like two pages, easy reading for even the intellectually laziest persons.

That definition is less than ideal from several perspectives. It serves neither side. The worst reason to hate it is that it relies on proving intent (dolus specialis), which essentially makes it unenforceable unless the perpetrator is a group of simpletons. It really hit me when I realized that there are only two ways to prove intent: The criminal admits it, or the prosecution proves that there are literally zero ot…

> It really hit me when I realized that there are only two ways to prove intent: The criminal admits it, or the prosecution proves that there are literally zero other possible explanations that could possibly fit the actions.

I doubt we'll have absolute certainty about genocide until Nuremberg-style trials take place. The problem is such trials won't happen unless the international community intervenes, and they don't seem willing to intervene without 100% certainty. Chicken-egg problem.

Re: A/I shuts down

#608

Post by TMWNN »

fatbird wrote: post #561
TMWNN wrote: post #531

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Officer Sicknick did not die from being hit by a fire extinguisher because that never happened https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/brian-sicknick-fire-exting... >. He died of a stroke which the autopsy found no connection with the riot https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/apr/19/brian-sickn... >. The one person who died violently was one of the rioters, an unarmed woman who was shot by Capitol Police. Four other r…

An unarmed woman climbing through a smashed window with a capital police officer on the other side, sidearm drawn, warning her not to advance, in the middle of a crowd storming the capitol building while a gallows stood outside, waiting for the crowd to bring out a member of congress or the Vice President. > * U.S. representative Markwayne Mullin [currently head of DHS], a witness to Babbitt's attempted breach, said…

>The shooting was deemed “lawful and within department policy”.

I do not disagree with this at all. I only mentioned her death as contrast to the usual rhetoric of how the mob at the Capitol "killed" Officer Sicknick and others (who are always mysteriously unnamed).

Re: A/I shuts down

#609

Post by disgruntledphd2 »

aa-jv wrote: post #595
disgruntledphd2 wrote: post #591

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> NATO has been involved in every war crime the USA has committed this century. NATO countries, yes (mostly the Brits and Polish). NATO as an organization, only for Serbia and Afghanistan.

Brits, Polish, Germans, Italians, French, Turkish. NATO bases are used without discretion to launch atrocities.

Not always, specifically not for the most recent war (gulf war 3).

Re: A/I shuts down

#610

Post by ModernMech »

Barrin92 wrote: post #326
dvt wrote: post #307

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> So unless you're willing to become a literal terrorist organization and die with a bunch of your friends in an uphill battle (not technically unwinnable, but at least lopsided and the casualties will be tremendous), the only option is to cave. Honestly, the internet has made folks so lazy. It's very ironic that the most "revolutionary" act taken recently (January 6) was actually done by the far-right. Yeah: if you…

Jan 6, didn't work, not entirely sure why you bring this up as a blueprint for anyone. It was an actual LARP and as Bruno Macaes wrote resembled a bunch of people making it to the end of a videogame, then running around confused in costumes and going for a drink. What did work for them was pouring money into the election system and party apparatus, media, the courts and then taking control over politics

Jan 6 was an attempt to convince the American public that the 2020 election was stolen, and to keep Trump in power. Today, more people believe the 2020 election was stolen than on January 7th, Trump is in power despite causing an insurrection, and all the J6 insurrectionists have been pardoned. They’re even setting up to pay them “restitution” out of your pocket.

You can be the judge as to whether it succeeded or victory was deferred, but violence definitely won in the end.

Post reply on HN