Earlier quoted context omitted.
>Does modern English read like historical English? If you can read and understand text from the 18th century, then yes. We're not talking about Middle English or Old English. >but the fact that there are "native speakers" involved in the debate I should have put native speakers in quotes as well. What counts as a native Ulster Scots speaker is someone who speaks English with an NI accent with some localisms thrown in…
> If you can read and understand text from the 18th century, then yes. Yes, and I can read and understand historical Ulster Scots as well, but you were making a different point about codification/drift, no? The English I would find in those historical writings is quite different from what is being taught in schools today or recommended in style guides. > What counts as a native Ulster Scots speaker is someone who spe…
I'm not entertaining the notion that I have to pretend you're a native speaker when you've made clear you're only identifying as such for the purpose of making an argument.
>There is no "protestant community" in Northern Ireland.
Anyone who applies for a job in NI fills out a form where they are asked if they are a member of "the Protestant community", "the Roman Catholic community" or neither. You're denying the factual existence of the different communities in NI for the purpose of winning an argument on the internet.