Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think it should be a combination of both GitHub and StackOverflow. GitHub is great to see if the person can code, and a very crucial part of hiring. StackOverflow is great to see if a person can communicate, which I think is as important as having the ability to code. I've come across many programmers that can code well, but had horrible communications skills. It's always difficult to interact with these programmer…
StackOverflow primarily exposes their addictive game-playing, not their communication skills. The rep/badge bullshit encourages inane responses, and the wiki aspects cover the tracks.
Programmer search engine
61–70 of 89 posts
Re: Programmer search engine
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think it should be a combination of both GitHub and StackOverflow. GitHub is great to see if the person can code, and a very crucial part of hiring. StackOverflow is great to see if a person can communicate, which I think is as important as having the ability to code. I've come across many programmers that can code well, but had horrible communications skills. It's always difficult to interact with these programmer…
"StackOverflow is great to see if a person can communicate ..." ... on StackOverflow. Meanwhile, the great bulk of programmer communication is happening on blogs, mailing lists, and IRC. You're very right that written and verbal communication is important, but you have to look in the right places for it.
Re: Programmer search engine
#63I would prefer a programmer search engine based on Github, where people write code, to StackOverflow, where people talk about code.
What happened to people who can write successful products but not yet been open sourced? This happened to John Carmack, Jamie Zawinski. They are probably too busy in making stuffs work then writing answers on Stack Overflow or committing code to GitHub.
Re: Programmer search engine
#64I am impressed that they have people outside the states though, that seems to indicate that the place is not just a me too copy cat.
Re: Programmer search engine
#65Re: Programmer search engine
#66Re: Programmer search engine
#67Earlier quoted context omitted.
Perhaps it will be so lucrative because employers will get sick of paying percentages of salaries in recruiter's fees and so many of them will sign up for this more-modest subscription fee?
Roughly how many points does a recruiter get?
That's the default. If you're crafty there are ways to force it down over the course of the arrangement.
Re: Programmer search engine
#68Earlier quoted context omitted.
Perhaps it will be so lucrative because employers will get sick of paying percentages of salaries in recruiter's fees and so many of them will sign up for this more-modest subscription fee?
Roughly how many points does a recruiter get?
Re: Programmer search engine
#69Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not to take anything away from hotjobs, but I would argue that the real value Stack overflow careers offers is the fact that an employer can not only see your CV, but at least somewhat determine your level of expertise through your stack overflow account/reputation. I imagine Joel believes this has more value then just the data extracted from a resume.
> I would argue that the real value Stack overflow careers offers is the fact that an employer can not only see your CV What stops people from linking to their stackoverflow accounts? Many people already link their CV to their github accounts.
Re: Programmer search engine
#70Earlier quoted context omitted.
You're right. I wonder if this was part of the plan for stack overflow from the beginning. This is an ingenious way to monetize its existing user base while creating incentives for stack overflow users to keep creating valuable content for free.
Speaking of, I wonder how many millions an open HN job board could make? The people I'd like to hire are stackoverflow, github, and HN users.