Live data from Hacker News

Mark Zuckerberg appears on CNBC to discuss a social network (2004) [video]

facebook.com

61–70 of 87 posts

Re: Mark Zuckerberg appears on CNBC to discuss a social network (2004) [video]

#61
post #38
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is highly dependent on your circle of friends. It's much more enjoyable when you're following people who are doing interesting things An RSS reader wouldn't be compelling if you're just subscribed to Buzzfeed, after all.

Well, you're probably not wrong. 99% of my ~400 "friends" are people I knew in high school who I haven't seen in 15 years. I keep in contact with my actual friends, but not via FB.

Unsubscribe from their feeds. Unsubscribing, I've basically ignored most of my facebook friends. It's great.

Re: Mark Zuckerberg appears on CNBC to discuss a social network (2004) [video]

#62
post #24

What's with the hate in this thread? He achieved something quite remarkable. Back then, most people wouldn't have guessed that this silly campus site ever became as big as it is now. And now, Mark created a business with thousands of employees, changing how we communicate, how we discover information about the cities we live in. Give the man some respect. This isn't about his privileged background, but about the pers…

I met him around about this time - we were working on a variety of gigs in Cambridge, and ended up in a secret society house (don't ask me which, I honestly don't remember) at some point in a night out... someone might know - go in, up stairs, big withdrawing room with a pair of chesterfields perpendicular to a fireplace, wood panelling, that sort of thing. Remember shooting the shit with him about this social networ…

> Not sure why I'm telling this tale

Maybe to brag that you've hung out with him? That's not meant to be snarky. It's the same explanation for why people want the autograph of someone famous - to try to convince other people they know high status, powerful people, and by association they are one themselves.

We are often unaware of why we do what we do... or we tell people one reason and keep the real reason to ourselves :-)

Re: Mark Zuckerberg appears on CNBC to discuss a social network (2004) [video]

#63
post #61
post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well, you're probably not wrong. 99% of my ~400 "friends" are people I knew in high school who I haven't seen in 15 years. I keep in contact with my actual friends, but not via FB.

Unsubscribe from their feeds. Unsubscribing, I've basically ignored most of my facebook friends. It's great.

So then what's the point? Since I deleted my account my relationships with my real friends and family has definitely improved. When I see them in person we actually have things to catch up on and talk about and those in person interactions have much more value for me.

Re: Mark Zuckerberg appears on CNBC to discuss a social network (2004) [video]

#64
post #61
post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well, you're probably not wrong. 99% of my ~400 "friends" are people I knew in high school who I haven't seen in 15 years. I keep in contact with my actual friends, but not via FB.

Unsubscribe from their feeds. Unsubscribing, I've basically ignored most of my facebook friends. It's great.

I'm defrending, trying to get to Guess your idea is better, but it's actually kind of fun to de-friend ppl. You should try ;)

Re: Mark Zuckerberg appears on CNBC to discuss a social network (2004) [video]

#65
post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I met him around about this time - we were working on a variety of gigs in Cambridge, and ended up in a secret society house (don't ask me which, I honestly don't remember) at some point in a night out... someone might know - go in, up stairs, big withdrawing room with a pair of chesterfields perpendicular to a fireplace, wood panelling, that sort of thing. Remember shooting the shit with him about this social networ…

> Not sure why I'm telling this tale Maybe to brag that you've hung out with him? That's not meant to be snarky. It's the same explanation for why people want the autograph of someone famous - to try to convince other people they know high status, powerful people, and by association they are one themselves. We are often unaware of why we do what we do... or we tell people one reason and keep the real reason to oursel…

If I wanted to brag I'd tell you who I am and who I actually know, rather than an anecdote about a passing encounter! Actually thought twice about posting for this precise reason.

Re: Mark Zuckerberg appears on CNBC to discuss a social network (2004) [video]

#66

More interested in the algorithms of Google than a copy and paste of MySpace.

Facebook today is equal if not more complex than Google. They process a huge amount of user data and it's all searchable. The relationships in that data are much more complex than in web search results.

Making something "searchable" and graph analysis is what Google is designed for.

Re: Mark Zuckerberg appears on CNBC to discuss a social network (2004) [video]

#67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If I can copy and paste what you're thinking, then yes. Otherwise, nope. Too hard to tell what's underlying the code in the case of a search engine, machine learning or artificial intelligence system. Large difference between the code behind intelligent algorithms and text entry boxes with DB calls. BBSs, TheWell, Compuserve, Prodigy, AOL, TheGlobe, Geocities, Friendster, MySpace, Facebook, what's next? Fill in the b…

Actually what Google does is fairly trivial and not based on "artificial intelligence" ...

To call what Google does "trivial" kind of ends this thread.

Re: Mark Zuckerberg appears on CNBC to discuss a social network (2004) [video]

#68
post #24

What's with the hate in this thread? He achieved something quite remarkable. Back then, most people wouldn't have guessed that this silly campus site ever became as big as it is now. And now, Mark created a business with thousands of employees, changing how we communicate, how we discover information about the cities we live in. Give the man some respect. This isn't about his privileged background, but about the pers…

Sorry, but I think you have a slightly too naive perspective. I think the criticism of him and Facebook is valid front to back. Sure, some people move towards the rage range of the spectrum, but it is also warranted towards someone who openly said that he wants to replace the open internet and that privacy is dead.

Re: Mark Zuckerberg appears on CNBC to discuss a social network (2004) [video]

#69
post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I met him around about this time - we were working on a variety of gigs in Cambridge, and ended up in a secret society house (don't ask me which, I honestly don't remember) at some point in a night out... someone might know - go in, up stairs, big withdrawing room with a pair of chesterfields perpendicular to a fireplace, wood panelling, that sort of thing. Remember shooting the shit with him about this social networ…

> Not sure why I'm telling this tale Maybe to brag that you've hung out with him? That's not meant to be snarky. It's the same explanation for why people want the autograph of someone famous - to try to convince other people they know high status, powerful people, and by association they are one themselves. We are often unaware of why we do what we do... or we tell people one reason and keep the real reason to oursel…

Maybe madaxe_again told it "to illuminate that the guy's a human being, and an entertaining one at that."

Re: Mark Zuckerberg appears on CNBC to discuss a social network (2004) [video]

#70
post #43
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>changing how we communicate... Perhaps, though I'm not convinced it was for the better. every time I log into Facebook I log off within five minutes wondering why I continue to waste my time with it. Maybe that's just my problem, I don't know.

I personally use facebook to talk to my friends. Maybe you should try it out to communicate wit yours?

> I personally use facebook to talk to my friends. Maybe you should try it out to communicate wit yours?

so in your logic, because somebody don't use facebook, he/she does not communicate with his/her friends?

wow

Post reply on HN