Live data from Hacker News

Mark Zuckerberg appears on CNBC to discuss a social network (2004) [video]

facebook.com

31–40 of 87 posts

Re: Mark Zuckerberg appears on CNBC to discuss a social network (2004) [video]

#31
post #28

Facebook CEO Admits To Calling Users 'Dumb Fucks' http://gawker.com/5636765/facebook-ceo-admits-to-calling-use... "Mark Zuckerberg admits in a New Yorker profile that he mocked early Facebook users for trusting him with their personal information."

It's almost like he's a human being and is fallible.

What seems to be passed off as a foible seems to me to be sociopathic.

Edit: less accusatory

Re: Mark Zuckerberg appears on CNBC to discuss a social network (2004) [video]

#32
post #24

What's with the hate in this thread? He achieved something quite remarkable. Back then, most people wouldn't have guessed that this silly campus site ever became as big as it is now. And now, Mark created a business with thousands of employees, changing how we communicate, how we discover information about the cities we live in. Give the man some respect. This isn't about his privileged background, but about the pers…

>changing how we communicate...

Perhaps, though I'm not convinced it was for the better. every time I log into Facebook I log off within five minutes wondering why I continue to waste my time with it. Maybe that's just my problem, I don't know.

Re: Mark Zuckerberg appears on CNBC to discuss a social network (2004) [video]

#33
post #29
post #24

What's with the hate in this thread? He achieved something quite remarkable. Back then, most people wouldn't have guessed that this silly campus site ever became as big as it is now. And now, Mark created a business with thousands of employees, changing how we communicate, how we discover information about the cities we live in. Give the man some respect. This isn't about his privileged background, but about the pers…

Basically it's his flagrant disrespect and violation of human privacy at a mindbogglingly massive scale. He got us here by tricking us with cheap tricks. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/04/facebooks-evil-interfa... The way I see, he is one of the worst things to happen to the Internet if not the worst, but that's just my opinion.

I could not agree more!

Re: Mark Zuckerberg appears on CNBC to discuss a social network (2004) [video]

#34
post #32
post #24

What's with the hate in this thread? He achieved something quite remarkable. Back then, most people wouldn't have guessed that this silly campus site ever became as big as it is now. And now, Mark created a business with thousands of employees, changing how we communicate, how we discover information about the cities we live in. Give the man some respect. This isn't about his privileged background, but about the pers…

>changing how we communicate... Perhaps, though I'm not convinced it was for the better. every time I log into Facebook I log off within five minutes wondering why I continue to waste my time with it. Maybe that's just my problem, I don't know.

This is highly dependent on your circle of friends. It's much more enjoyable when you're following people who are doing interesting things

An RSS reader wouldn't be compelling if you're just subscribed to Buzzfeed, after all.

Re: Mark Zuckerberg appears on CNBC to discuss a social network (2004) [video]

#35
post #32
post #24

What's with the hate in this thread? He achieved something quite remarkable. Back then, most people wouldn't have guessed that this silly campus site ever became as big as it is now. And now, Mark created a business with thousands of employees, changing how we communicate, how we discover information about the cities we live in. Give the man some respect. This isn't about his privileged background, but about the pers…

>changing how we communicate... Perhaps, though I'm not convinced it was for the better. every time I log into Facebook I log off within five minutes wondering why I continue to waste my time with it. Maybe that's just my problem, I don't know.

Definitely not my problem at least. Facebook is an integral part of my life.

Re: Mark Zuckerberg appears on CNBC to discuss a social network (2004) [video]

#36
post #31
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's almost like he's a human being and is fallible.

What seems to be passed off as a foible seems to me to be sociopathic. Edit: less accusatory

Trash talking at that age is an embarrassingly normal thing to do. Accusing people of sociopathy without evidence is worse.

It's also hugely diluting of signal/noise ratio in threads. Grandiose accusations are noise, and no evidence means no signal. Please don't post such things to HN.

Re: Mark Zuckerberg appears on CNBC to discuss a social network (2004) [video]

#37
post #8

Really shows the incredible privilege and connections he had, so early in his life, that catapulted FB over all the other budding social networks. It's always about who you know to give your work wings (which is apt, since his project was a social network)

> Really shows the incredible privilege and connections he had

What possible grounds could you have for claiming that? The video I watched showed nothing of that kind. I'd say what it showed was the incredible focus and product sense he had.

Re: Mark Zuckerberg appears on CNBC to discuss a social network (2004) [video]

#38
post #34
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>changing how we communicate... Perhaps, though I'm not convinced it was for the better. every time I log into Facebook I log off within five minutes wondering why I continue to waste my time with it. Maybe that's just my problem, I don't know.

This is highly dependent on your circle of friends. It's much more enjoyable when you're following people who are doing interesting things An RSS reader wouldn't be compelling if you're just subscribed to Buzzfeed, after all.

Well, you're probably not wrong. 99% of my ~400 "friends" are people I knew in high school who I haven't seen in 15 years.

I keep in contact with my actual friends, but not via FB.

Re: Mark Zuckerberg appears on CNBC to discuss a social network (2004) [video]

#39
post #36
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What seems to be passed off as a foible seems to me to be sociopathic. Edit: less accusatory

Trash talking at that age is an embarrassingly normal thing to do. Accusing people of sociopathy without evidence is worse. It's also hugely diluting of signal/noise ratio in threads. Grandiose accusations are noise, and no evidence means no signal. Please don't post such things to HN.

Re: accusatory tone - I adjusted my comment to reflect more clearly this is only my take away. But I think his words and actions are the evidence. I understand trash talk, but calling your users (behind their back) "dumb fucks" sounds like nothing but contempt.
Post reply on HN