Earlier quoted context omitted.
That commen means: you can take any company and find that its practices are shady. Nobody questions semantics. You think Apple is shady, I think Google is no less shady, maybe more, given their business model.
Well this interpretation is roughly on par. How does the fact that Google might employ shady practices as well really add anything to the discussion? Does that absolve Apple from any wrongdoings?
Apple seeks to trademark “startup” in Australia
61–70 of 73 posts
Re: Apple seeks to trademark “startup” in Australia
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
Say one thing OS X does objectively better than Linux. I honestly can't think of any.
I've run both linux and OS X as my default setups (currently linux), and I have to say, OS X does a lot of things better. I like linux better overall, but that's just too strong a statement. Here's a few that OS X does better: -- Font anti-aliasing. -- Package management - people using linux should be expected to be able to compile from source, I know, but at least most packages released for Mac OS X are developed wi…
Open source Unix systems are the kings of package management. OS X pretty much does the exact opposite of 'package management', and any third party solution is based on existing Linux and BSD implementations.
Re: Apple seeks to trademark “startup” in Australia
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
As someone using OS X over Linux because of monitor-related reasons, I actually think Ubuntu supports multiple displays better than OS X.
IME, Linux has a long way to go for non-dual-head setups. I have four monitors with different geometries on two graphics cards on a Hackintosh and OS X handles it seamlessly. Ubuntu pukes hard and dies (or, almost as bad, just ignores monitors) when it can't figure out how it should handle them all in a single X session.
If you manage to get all four monitors on one card somehow, X can handle the multiple geometries just fine. Though it will generally do a terrible job of automatically detecting the right resolution.
Love Linux, but this bit does disappoint.
Re: Apple seeks to trademark “startup” in Australia
#64Earlier quoted context omitted.
Please don't say Linux.
Say one thing OS X does objectively better than Linux. I honestly can't think of any.
I've got Ubuntu 12 open in VMWare, running Firefox, and so I can compare it to my Mac running Mountain Lion. I'll pick on window resizing. Here are ways that Ubuntu's window resizing is objectively worse than OS X:
1. The resize edges on the right, left, and bottom are exactly one pixel in extent. They're nearly impossible to hit.
2. When resizing the Firefox window larger on the left/top sides, there's ugly flicker and transient drawing artifacts on the right/bottom side.
3. The resize cursors are misleading. For example, if I grab the top and resize the window as tall as it will go, the cursor still implies it can grow taller. On OS X the cursor changes when the window reaches a limit.
4. An Ubuntu Firefox window can be sized down to three pixels wide. It's hard to click on this window to make it bigger again.
5. Ubuntu allows me to position the window under the launcher and then resize it smaller. Such a window then gets "stuck" behind the launcher. I was also able to get an OS X window stuck behind the Dock, but it was harder: I had to make the Dock smaller, reposition the window, then make the Dock larger again.
6. If you position a window partially offscreen and then try to resize it smaller, it does this weird jitter thing.
7. Ubuntu does not appear to support background, fixed aspect ratio, or centered resizing, which are power-user features in OS X that you can access with modifier keys. If I hold down the shift key, then the Ubuntu window does some sort of snapping thing where it alternates between being as wide as it can, and being three pixels wide (??)
That's from a few minutes of poking around with a single UI interaction.
This isn't a fanboi post. While I like OS X, I noticed things that Ubuntu does better. But in turn, an objective Linux user cannot miss the many things that OS X does better.
Re: Apple seeks to trademark “startup” in Australia
#65Earlier quoted context omitted.
Say one thing OS X does objectively better than Linux. I honestly can't think of any.
I don't know the current state of high density display support in X11 (and I may just be an ignorant user and plain old wrong about this), but it was a totally broken deal breaker for me a year ago.
Re: Apple seeks to trademark “startup” in Australia
#66Earlier quoted context omitted.
IME, Linux has a long way to go for non-dual-head setups. I have four monitors with different geometries on two graphics cards on a Hackintosh and OS X handles it seamlessly. Ubuntu pukes hard and dies (or, almost as bad, just ignores monitors) when it can't figure out how it should handle them all in a single X session.
A single X session cannot span two graphics cards. X just doesn't support it. You're waiting on Mir or Wayland for that one. If you manage to get all four monitors on one card somehow, X can handle the multiple geometries just fine. Though it will generally do a terrible job of automatically detecting the right resolution. Love Linux, but this bit does disappoint.
Re: Apple seeks to trademark “startup” in Australia
#67Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've run both linux and OS X as my default setups (currently linux), and I have to say, OS X does a lot of things better. I like linux better overall, but that's just too strong a statement. Here's a few that OS X does better: -- Font anti-aliasing. -- Package management - people using linux should be expected to be able to compile from source, I know, but at least most packages released for Mac OS X are developed wi…
I've been using Linux and BSD for thirteen years and I can't even remember the last time I had to manually build and install an application from source (not counting random, early-stage hobby projects from github and things). Open source Unix systems are the kings of package management. OS X pretty much does the exact opposite of 'package management', and any third party solution is based on existing Linux and BSD im…
Let's say you wanted to install Google Chrome. On OS X, you go to chrome.com and click the single "Download now" button, and it downloads.
On Linux, you get the same button, except clicking it takes you to another screen where you have to know whether you are a "Debian/Ubuntu" or a "Fedora/openSUSE" user or need a "community supported" version, and whether you want the 32 bit or 64 bit version, and whether you want to "add the Google repository to your system", and here's a thing to run on the command line if you don't want that.
The "sudo apt-get install yadayada" stuff is legitimately great for power users. But for most consumers, the OS X approach is definitely to be preferred.
Re: Apple seeks to trademark “startup” in Australia
#68Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've run both linux and OS X as my default setups (currently linux), and I have to say, OS X does a lot of things better. I like linux better overall, but that's just too strong a statement. Here's a few that OS X does better: -- Font anti-aliasing. -- Package management - people using linux should be expected to be able to compile from source, I know, but at least most packages released for Mac OS X are developed wi…
I've been using Linux and BSD for thirteen years and I can't even remember the last time I had to manually build and install an application from source (not counting random, early-stage hobby projects from github and things). Open source Unix systems are the kings of package management. OS X pretty much does the exact opposite of 'package management', and any third party solution is based on existing Linux and BSD im…
This is something I keep hearing, and I keep linking to the same thing. "Download and One-Click Install" can easily be done on Linux. In fact, that's even what it is called: "One Click Install", at least as far as openSUSE is concerned.
Explanation: http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:One_Click_Install
Example: http://software.opensuse.org/package/chromium
Bonus: It still adds a repository so you have a working update path that plays nicely with the centralised package management that lets you manage every single package centrally, instead of having half a gazillion individual updaters, bundled libs etc.
Re: Apple seeks to trademark “startup” in Australia
#69Trademarks are not global variables. They are scoped. In trademark law these are called "classes". If I have a trademark for McDonalds that covers navigation equipment, then the hamburger company can't sue me using their trademark which covers hamburgers. The coverage is scoped. Now! Observe the list of classes -- 37, 38, 41 and 42. Apple is essentially registering "startup" to cover devices, their maintenance, devel…
The owner of a mark with a sufficient reputation can take action against dissimilar goods and services where they're riding on the goodwill of the mark of course so TMs are not completely limited to their classes. Rolex could sue me if used their marks on a good which they weren't registered in if I was trying to take unfair advantage of their mark, tractors for example. Whilst it's highly unlikely in this case that…
Re: Apple seeks to trademark “startup” in Australia
#70Earlier quoted context omitted.
Say one thing OS X does objectively better than Linux. I honestly can't think of any.
I've run both linux and OS X as my default setups (currently linux), and I have to say, OS X does a lot of things better. I like linux better overall, but that's just too strong a statement. Here's a few that OS X does better: -- Font anti-aliasing. -- Package management - people using linux should be expected to be able to compile from source, I know, but at least most packages released for Mac OS X are developed wi…
The fonts appear smudged out and blurry and are much harder to read on normal displays than the anti-aliasing used in both Windows and Linux.