Ornith-1.0: self-improving open-source models for agentic coding
61–65 of 65 posts
Re: Ornith-1.0: self-improving open-source models for agentic coding
#62Re: Ornith-1.0: self-improving open-source models for agentic coding
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think the 9b and 31b dense are Gemma models and the 35B-MoE, and 397B-MoE are Qwen models since these are model sizes covered by each of them respectively
Only the 31b is Gemma. All the rest - including 9B - are Qwen 3.5/3.6: https://huggingface.co/deepreinforce-ai/Ornith-1.0-9B/blob/m...
Re: Ornith-1.0: self-improving open-source models for agentic coding
#64I've been testing Ornith-1.0 35B (my own FP8-block quant) and I like it. It runs at >200 tok/s w/ vLLM on an RTX PRO 6000 (sm120), I've run >140M cached tokens of agentic coding work on it over the past few days. It seems to about somewhere between Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B and 27B, but the good thing: it overthinks/doom-loop a lot less than Qwen 3.6. When looking at the thinking traces I like its breakdown approach template.…
With this model size I've found that the harness seems to matter more. I've moved on to little-coder rather than raw pi with qwen3.6 27b personally, it might be worth taking a look.
Model Adapter Suite Score Passed Tasks
--------------------------------- ------------ -------------- ------ ------ -----
local/ornith-1.0-35b little_coder aider_polyglot 36.0% 81/225 225
local/ornith-1.0-35b pi_devstack aider_polyglot 39.6% 89/225 225
local/ornith-1.0-35b pi_vanilla aider_polyglot 32.0% 72/225 225
Little Code does a little better than raw Pi, although maybe not better than my personal Pi setup: https://github.com/lhl/devstackRe: Ornith-1.0: self-improving open-source models for agentic coding
#65Self-improving systems are exciting, but they also make provenance and governance much harder. Once agents can modify their own behavior over time, understanding why an agent behaved a certain way becomes increasingly important.