Earlier quoted context omitted.
The evidence that this controller was overworked is that practically all controllers in the US at present are overworked. As such, that should be treated as the null hypothesis, and it would require substantial evidence to show that he isn't overworked.
Couldn’t we just… wait to see what FAA says before coming up with our own (entirely speculative) theories?
LaGuardia pilots raised safety alarms months before deadly runway crash
61–70 of 324 posts
Re: LaGuardia pilots raised safety alarms months before deadly runway crash
#62Re: LaGuardia pilots raised safety alarms months before deadly runway crash
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
Couldn’t we just… wait to see what FAA says before coming up with our own (entirely speculative) theories?
Can we trust the FAA's conclusion? Its previous head had a term that didn't expire until 2028 but he resigned after pressure from Elon Musk (who didn't like that he got fined), now a Trump-friendly head has been installed. What, realistically, would be the consequences if he lied? Likely none. Government officials lying on record is an every day occurrence these days.
Re: LaGuardia pilots raised safety alarms months before deadly runway crash
#64Does anyone know why the fire truck was driving across the runway in the first place? Was it a patrol, repositioning the truck, or was there an active incident that they were responding to? Seems like reducing the number of times you have to drive across an active runway is in general a good thing, but perhaps at an airport this old this is the only way to get from A to B.
Re: LaGuardia pilots raised safety alarms months before deadly runway crash
#65Does anyone know why the fire truck was driving across the runway in the first place? Was it a patrol, repositioning the truck, or was there an active incident that they were responding to? Seems like reducing the number of times you have to drive across an active runway is in general a good thing, but perhaps at an airport this old this is the only way to get from A to B.
Re: LaGuardia pilots raised safety alarms months before deadly runway crash
#66Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe there should be more than one
Maybe. Lets see what the NTSB recommendations say. However despite the downvotes I still haven't seen evidence that they were running understaffed at that moment. What I do know is that the developing emergency on the tarmac due to an apparently hazardous smell in another plane is likely the cause of the confusion that led to this incident. That's a trigger that could have been exacerbated by fatigue but we don't hav…
Re: LaGuardia pilots raised safety alarms months before deadly runway crash
#67Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
Can you elaborate on what change you would like to occur? I have voted based on getting particular people nominated within a federal agency, requires the President to pick someone who will 100% be from their party, and a Senate committee that will confirm them people tend to think "I'm voting against my best interests" without knowing that the agency control was my best interest as it will most likely continue shapin…
Re: LaGuardia pilots raised safety alarms months before deadly runway crash
#68Earlier quoted context omitted.
And therein lies the problem. Clearly, having one overworked controller running a combined tower is not safe nor sustainable.
Planes landing at a rate of one every 30-40 minutes isn't exactly "overworked."
Re: LaGuardia pilots raised safety alarms months before deadly runway crash
#69Re: LaGuardia pilots raised safety alarms months before deadly runway crash
#70Earlier quoted context omitted.
> the controller in question was working both ground and air control simultaneously due to staffing shortages How many planes land at LGA in the middle the night? One controller overnight is completely reasonable.
>> One controller overnight is completely reasonable So if said controller has a medical episode?