Earlier quoted context omitted.
They are not unelected. They might be appointed but the parliament is elected and can block this. Go vote in EU elections. A parliament that is not full of conservatives can block this.
The EU is not some US from 30 years ago. It is not "conservatives" that push these totalitarian proposals over here. Look at the DSA voting record. Digital Services Act: https://howtheyvote.eu/votes/139040
The EU could be scanning your chats by October 2025
61–70 of 259 posts
Re: The EU could be scanning your chats by October 2025
#62"the EU wants to scan your messages" implies its every member state and not one freak from Denmark putting this forward where it will die. The EU has always been 90 days from passing mass surveliance for the last decade. Until member states start actually backing this these articles are nothing but click bait.
Re: The EU could be scanning your chats by October 2025
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
By banning real encryption, the police can arrest anyone using chat apps they can't control. Them not being able to spy on you automatically makes you guilty. Also something something children something terrorism something something safety, whatever makes the uninformed public feel like this is something that'll benefit them.
The criminals will just use something that hides in plain sight. I think it was Encrochat devices that booted into a fairly vanilla looking OS, and there was another platform where it was hidden in something like a calculator app.
Re: The EU could be scanning your chats by October 2025
#64Earlier quoted context omitted.
By banning real encryption, the police can arrest anyone using chat apps they can't control. Them not being able to spy on you automatically makes you guilty. Also something something children something terrorism something something safety, whatever makes the uninformed public feel like this is something that'll benefit them.
The criminals will just use something that hides in plain sight. I think it was Encrochat devices that booted into a fairly vanilla looking OS, and there was another platform where it was hidden in something like a calculator app.
Re: The EU could be scanning your chats by October 2025
#65Earlier quoted context omitted.
it only needs to pass once. if you keep trying it will.
"You need to be lucky every time to stop us, but we only need to be lucky once"
Re: The EU could be scanning your chats by October 2025
#66"the EU wants to scan your messages" implies its every member state and not one freak from Denmark putting this forward where it will die. The EU has always been 90 days from passing mass surveliance for the last decade. Until member states start actually backing this these articles are nothing but click bait.
So getting upset that people talk about it when it gets tabled once again is illogical and unjustifiable.
Re: The EU could be scanning your chats by October 2025
#67Nothing will come of this. Germany, for some reason, really doesn't like the idea of monitoring citizens messages. Anything that eventually passes will be extremely toothless.
Re: The EU could be scanning your chats by October 2025
#68Earlier quoted context omitted.
OK, I’ll bite. What reason would there be to paint every bird orange?
There isnt. Its a crazy example of what is happening here. To use a real world example take this "EU deal" that Trump did. Everyone is talking like its already taken effect. But the reality is the EU just handshake agreed to this, but at the end of the day all of the member states have to rattify it. And if states dont or if there are arguements made the whole thing gets tossed. I just wish people would say that they…
Just look at the Brexit vote for an example of how little people understand the EU and how it works.
Re: The EU could be scanning your chats by October 2025
#69Why does this stupid idea have to be killed so many times? Being watched constantly means living in fear, but seeing it almost become legally mandated practice over and over again is itself a form of living in fear. I'm so tired.
It was more misunderstood than stupid. Ironically when Apple introduced their solution it was actually better than what we have now. It was interesting to watch people lose their minds because they didn't understand how the current or proposed system worked. Current system everything can be decrypted on the cloud and is scanned for CSAM by all ISPs/service providers. Apple wanted the device to scan for CSAM and if it…
How? Are you implying adynchronous and synchronous encryption is broken? Because last time I checked since Snowden our encryption is basically the one single thing in the whole concept of the internet that has been done very right, with forward secrecy and long term security in mind. AFAIK there are no signs that someone or something has been able to break it.
Also, the solutions you present do imply that someone already has the private key to decrypt. Sure, they'll say they'll just decrypt if your a bad person, but the definition of a bad person changes from government to government (see USA), and from CEO to CEO. Encryption should and mostly is built on zero trust and it only works with zero trust. Scanning, and risking the privacy of billions and billions of messages by having the key to read them because there have been some bad actors is fighting a fly with a bazooka. Which sounds funny overkill, but, fun fact, it also just doesn't work. It destroys a lot, and gains nothing.
I don't have a better solution for the problem. But this solution is definitely the wrong one.