US judge finds NSO Group liable for hacking journalists via WhatsApp

Post by fakedang » Sat, Dec 21, 2024, 4:25 PM UTC

talldayo wrote: post #50

lifestyleguru wrote: post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why should journalist badge provide some kind of protection shield? [1] [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pablo_Gonz%C3%A1lez_Yag%C3%BCe

In Israel's opinion? It shouldn't: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_journalists_killed_in_... Israeli forces killed 38x more journalists than Hamas did on October 7th.

Post by kotaKat » Sat, Dec 21, 2024, 4:44 PM UTC

wslh wrote: post #39

There are many other companies beyond NSO Group, if I were a journalist I would write a more comprehensive list of them and educate about this whole "industry".

Post by Bilal_io » Sat, Dec 21, 2024, 5:10 PM UTC

wslh wrote: post #59

talldayo wrote: post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

NSO Group is unique in that they are entirely sheltered from (largely due) criticism by their government, creating an unaccountable and injust basis of relations between the United States and Israel that many readers are concerned by. There simply aren't any other comparably corrupt "cybersecurity" outfits in the world. Kinda similar to how the IDF has never been charged with war crimes despite several of their servi…

[flagged]

Post by Bilal_io » Sat, Dec 21, 2024, 5:18 PM UTC

rexpop wrote: post #64

stonesthrowaway wrote: post #60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

[flagged]

Post by ignoramous » Sat, Dec 21, 2024, 5:36 PM UTC

ilbeeper wrote: post #57

ignoramous wrote: post #54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I have no opinion ... I don't know enough to form an opinion. Why speak in hypotheticals supporting some phantom opinion? Concern trolling is even worse.

It is not hypothetical, the fact is that killing drones are used in practice, and it just doesn't make sense to oppose lesser measures that are being used without judgement when killing is allowed.