Earlier quoted context omitted.
Virtually all companies oppose unionization. Am I to believe that all these companies are doing so out of sheer incompetence?
These companies need to remember that NLRB and unionization was an agreement to take harsh violence off the table. In the old days, when First International and IWW was created, unionization efforts were to "set the bosses house on fire, with them in it", "pass out rifles to all workers and shoot up the bosses house", assaults, bombs.. you name it. That's also where we have the paramilitary force, Pinkertons. They we…
Apple's union-busting practices violated employee rights at NYC store
61–70 of 178 posts
Re: Apple's union-busting practices violated employee rights at NYC store
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Does anyone really think corporate anti-union talking points are in their workers' best interest? Yes, usually at least half the workforce. But but but the monthly dues!!!
[flagged]
Re: Apple's union-busting practices violated employee rights at NYC store
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
The stores are a pretty critical component in their sales, marketing, and support cycles, and generally considered a big part of their current success.
I don't think so. Apple Stores are mostly a US thing.
They have stores in 26 countries.
Re: Apple's union-busting practices violated employee rights at NYC store
#64I know I should be on the side of union organizers, but it's difficult to sympathize with them when they simultaneously try to portray themselves as David fighting Goliath, but also portray themselves as helpless victims when they get their flyers are taken down during break rooms and made to watch presentations.
You are right though, it won't be a popular opinion, but a union's strength should not be impacted by taking down fliers in a break room. There are also laws saying that the company can't lie to employees about what a union could mean, but unions are not held to the same standard.
Re: Apple's union-busting practices violated employee rights at NYC store
#65Earlier quoted context omitted.
Argument makes sense if you conveniently forget it's workers in the first place who created the company's wealth.
The workers didn't create the wealth. The owners did. The workers sold their time and labor, and we're compensated according to what they negotiated. Why should they be entitled to anything more?
Re: Apple's union-busting practices violated employee rights at NYC store
#66Earlier quoted context omitted.
The workers didn't create the wealth. The owners did. The workers sold their time and labor, and we're compensated according to what they negotiated. Why should they be entitled to anything more?
The owners wouldn't have been able to make more out of their company without others working for them. So yes, they did create the wealth. The owners could've died at some point and the company still would create the wealth. Up until to a certain point it takes those owners but it's a synergy.
Re: Apple's union-busting practices violated employee rights at NYC store
#67Sounds like Apple won this no? They prevented the union, which has given up, and their only punishment is to be told to stop doing something they should not have been doing anyway.
While it does say the certain stores, like St. Louis, have given up due to Apple's antagonism, it also says: "Union efforts are slowly gaining ground at Apple stores across the country." Precedent like this can help future efforts in other places, at the very least. And in general, little back and forth events like this is maybe the best we can hope for in this world where actual worker leadership/autonomism is farth…
Re: Apple's union-busting practices violated employee rights at NYC store
#68Earlier quoted context omitted.
These companies need to remember that NLRB and unionization was an agreement to take harsh violence off the table. In the old days, when First International and IWW was created, unionization efforts were to "set the bosses house on fire, with them in it", "pass out rifles to all workers and shoot up the bosses house", assaults, bombs.. you name it. That's also where we have the paramilitary force, Pinkertons. They we…
Come on, nobody’s bombing Tim Cook’s house for flexible work schedules and paid parental leave at the Apple Store.
Not that I’m fully endorsing unions. In my particular part of the world (Netherlands) unions lack broad support but are the only laborers party bargaining collective labour agreements. The good thing is that those agreements are inclusive. The fun is where the unions members interest differ from genpop. You get things like union contributions paid for by employers, or worse like agreements that favor the old whom are more likely to be a member.
Re: Apple's union-busting practices violated employee rights at NYC store
#69Just goes to show how effective unionizing is. Power to those workers! They're a key part in making Apple one of the most valuable companies in the world. They deserve a fair share.
Indeed. Companies hate unions because they increase labor costs and benefits. Does anyone really think corporate anti-union talking points are in their workers' best interest? Unions have their faults (e.g. bureaucracy), but corporations aren't fighting them for their employees' benefit.
Sure. What do the C-suite employees stand to gain from it other than a whole new set of headaches when they have to deal with the union?
Re: Apple's union-busting practices violated employee rights at NYC store
#70Why doe Apple maintain retail stores anyway?
Having a place to go when one has a tech issue is a huge value addition for many Apple users. Repairs can be expensive (the solutions will lean towards "replace the entire motherboard"). But help at the genius bar from a real human can also be free. Compare this experience of what options one has if a hardware issue, or some software question, with a dell laptop. Availability of help at Apple stores is one reason I s…