Earlier quoted context omitted.
It can't. False positives are a trade-off against the administrative, legal and regulatory burdens of not having such a system on a UGC-hosting site at scale.
It seems like it does need to. Banning people for content they legally posses seems pretty questionable. Edit: You completely rewrote you comment after I responded, that is considered bad form on HN.
Dropbox deletes Rick and Morty creators account for secret TOS violation
61–70 of 381 posts
Re: Dropbox deletes Rick and Morty creators account for secret TOS violation
#62This wouldn't happen with SFTP, CVS and a $5 VPS.
Re: Dropbox deletes Rick and Morty creators account for secret TOS violation
#63Would this be some automated system that looks for copyrighted works?
How can an automated system know the identity of users and what rights and licensing agreements they hold?
Re: Dropbox deletes Rick and Morty creators account for secret TOS violation
#64Earlier quoted context omitted.
What you've described is not at all an equivalent for Dropbox. There are many, many features that your stack doesn't support.
Such as? Syncthing + NextCloud + rsnapshot backups would have been my open-source alternative recommendation, but of course not everyone wants to take the time to learn that skillet, set that up, and maintain it.
Or are you saying, "well, with a completely different stack I can get closer to feature parity"?
Re: Dropbox deletes Rick and Morty creators account for secret TOS violation
#65Yet another example of why we need a users bill of rights to give users some standardized legal recourse to discover the reasons for account bans and dispute them.
Sadly I’m not sure there’s a good advocacy group to push for this. Mozilla is funded by Google who definitely doesn’t want any user rights that conflict with their revenue. Maybe the EFF or FSF.
Re: Dropbox deletes Rick and Morty creators account for secret TOS violation
#66Hopefully this will stop HNers from linking everyone ye olde "this is why Dropbox is better than your nerdass solution" comment, and hopefully it vindicates everyone over the years who countered that argument by asking what happens when Dropbox deletes your account apropos of nothing...
Unless your "nerdass solution" involves hosting your own server, then you don't have any additional protection.
Re: Dropbox deletes Rick and Morty creators account for secret TOS violation
#67Earlier quoted context omitted.
What you've described is not at all an equivalent for Dropbox. There are many, many features that your stack doesn't support.
Such as? Syncthing + NextCloud + rsnapshot backups would have been my open-source alternative recommendation, but of course not everyone wants to take the time to learn that skillet, set that up, and maintain it.
Re: Dropbox deletes Rick and Morty creators account for secret TOS violation
#68Isn't it pointless to discuss this without knowing more about the communications that happened?
Re: Dropbox deletes Rick and Morty creators account for secret TOS violation
#69Are people still using dropbox? I thought other integrated service such as google drive and onedrive would have drove dropbox to the grave
700 million people use them, and 17 million are on a paid plan. I still use Dropbox, because I don't trust that I'd be able to reach a helpful human at Google should anything happen to my Google account.
Re: Dropbox deletes Rick and Morty creators account for secret TOS violation
#70Quoted post unavailable.
Overall, it's similar in relevance to security breaches. Awareness needs to be raised. Thus I'd argue it's relevant.