Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

VirtualBox is garbage

lkml.org

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

61–70 of 102 posts

Re: VirtualBox is garbage

#61

Post by ajross »

sherr wrote: post #60
ajross wrote: post #56

Earlier quoted context omitted.

kvm, for one. Not quite as featureful, and the UI is a command line (though there's the virt manager stuff that I haven't tried). But it's rock solid virtualization that never gives me problems. I think people are misunderstanding this thread. This is a kernel developers thread, where Dave Jones is complaining that virtualbox is the source of too much random corruption and arbitrary crashes in the kernel, and he's su…

"kvm, for one." Surely you're not saying KVM is bug free? Looks like it. That's almost certainly wrong.

I am surely not saying kvm is bug free. I am, however, saying it's much better than virtualbox.

Re: VirtualBox is garbage

#63

Post by yesimahuman »

VirtualBox running on a Windows 7 host with a Linux guest works great and improves each major release.

That being said, I've had severe issues with networking on older releases. Often the interface would work on the guest right after install, but would then completely fail the next time the VM was powered on.

It seems that has largely been fixed though.

Re: VirtualBox is garbage

#64

Post by ptman »

sherr wrote: post #60
ajross wrote: post #56

Earlier quoted context omitted.

kvm, for one. Not quite as featureful, and the UI is a command line (though there's the virt manager stuff that I haven't tried). But it's rock solid virtualization that never gives me problems. I think people are misunderstanding this thread. This is a kernel developers thread, where Dave Jones is complaining that virtualbox is the source of too much random corruption and arbitrary crashes in the kernel, and he's su…

"kvm, for one." Surely you're not saying KVM is bug free? Looks like it. That's almost certainly wrong.

kvm is very high quality. When the SmartOS developers ported it to the OpenIndiana (or is it IllumOS? the naming is a joke) kernel, they found almost no bugs in kvm. Porting usually exposes bugs.

Re: VirtualBox is garbage

#66

Post by shoota »

yesimahuman wrote: post #63

VirtualBox running on a Windows 7 host with a Linux guest works great and improves each major release. That being said, I've had severe issues with networking on older releases. Often the interface would work on the guest right after install, but would then completely fail the next time the VM was powered on. It seems that has largely been fixed though.

I'm running into an issue where I get intermittent internet disconnection on the guest. I can't pinpoint what's causing but gmail will just start to time out. Wasn't there in Vbox 3.x though.

Re: VirtualBox is garbage

#67

Post by copper »

kijin wrote: post #41
singular wrote: post #28

I've had quite a few issues with it. 1. Copy + paste randomly breaks between host win32, client ubuntu32. 2. Random freezes every so often. 3. Seamless mode extremely unreliable, does not draw correctly. 4. Horrible issues with shared folders breaking io operations. I actually got a (trivial) patch into golang to work around this issue (!). This also completely breaks ido mode completions in emacs. 5. Occasionally sh…

I use VirtualBox to run Ubuntu 32-bit and various other Linux distros on Win7 64-bit. No Truecrypt or Dropbox is involved. I have similar occasional issues with shared folders. Access denied randomly when trying to overwrite files. Files renamed in the host becoming inaccessible from the guest. NTFS symlinks in the host appearing as normal folders in the guest one day and as broken links the next day. Terribly slow I…

Hm, I've seen some really weird unicode-related corruption hitting files shared between guest and host due to (I assume) different line ending convention. Figuring out what was going on was not fun at all.

Re: VirtualBox is garbage

#68

Post by incub8or »

VirtualBox runs XP and Win7 perfectly on my MBP2011; it has saved my skin a number of times and am not sure why it does not work for some people. I was considering getting Parallels but this seems to do the trick and works for 2 other people I know as well. Plus it's free....

Re: VirtualBox is garbage

#69

Post by copper »

tzury wrote: post #45

The content of the article which does not work for most of HN. Enter your search termsSubmit search formWeblkml.org Date Thu, 6 Oct 2011 15:05:27 -0400 From Dave Jones Subject RFC: virtualbox tainting. The number of bug reports we get from people with virtualbox loaded are truly astonishing. It's GPL, but sadly that doesn't mean it's good. Nearly all of these bugs look like random corruption. (corrupt linked lists, c…

Honest question: is a strcmp really the best way there is to test for specific kernel modules?

Re: VirtualBox is garbage

#70

Post by joelthelion »

copper wrote: post #69
tzury wrote: post #45

The content of the article which does not work for most of HN. Enter your search termsSubmit search formWeblkml.org Date Thu, 6 Oct 2011 15:05:27 -0400 From Dave Jones Subject RFC: virtualbox tainting. The number of bug reports we get from people with virtualbox loaded are truly astonishing. It's GPL, but sadly that doesn't mean it's good. Nearly all of these bugs look like random corruption. (corrupt linked lists, c…

Honest question: is a strcmp really the best way there is to test for specific kernel modules?

What's wrong with it?
Post reply on HN